Single Bone Fixation of The Radius Versus Ulna in Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Children | ||||
| Fayoum University Medical Journal | ||||
| Volume 12, Issue 3, December 2023, Page 25-34 PDF (613.56 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Full Length research Papers | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/fumj.2023.336847 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Kamal Abdel-meguid1; Mohamed Arafa2; Hamdi Adel Ahmed Eissa  3; Mohammad Moussa2
| ||||
| 1Orthopedic department, Fayoum university | ||||
| 2Orthopedic department Fayoum university | ||||
| 3Orthopedic department, Faculty of medicine, Fayoum University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Introduction: Children and adolescents often sustain both-bone forearm fractures, which are common injuries. Aim of the study: To investigate the efficacy of single-bone fixation of the radius versus the ulna in diaphyseal forearm fractures in children. Subjects and Methods: There were 25 children with forearm both-bone fractures in a prospective cohort study. The ulnas of nine children (the ulnar cohort) and sixteen additional children (the radial cohort) were each treated with a single bone fixation utilizing an intramedullary flexible nail. Results: Twenty-four children (nine (100%) from the ulnar cohort and fifteen (94%) from the radial cohort) had an excellent score, while a single one from the radial cohort lost about nine degrees of pronation and was given a good score. Only one case suffered from the delayed union of the ulna. Conclusion: Both ulnar fixation and radial fixation had the same results in the treatment of both-bone fractures of the forearm of the children using single-bone fixation. They are reliable techniques with less operative time, excellent functional outcomes, a low rate of complications, and less radiation exposure. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Forearm Fractures; Intramedullary Fixation; Paediatric Fractures; Both Bone Fractures; ESIN; Single-bone fixation | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 112 PDF Download: 214 |
||||
