Vienna Nomogram Versus Standard Twelve Core Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: Safety and Efficacy | ||||
| Fayoum University Medical Journal | ||||
| Volume 12, Issue 3, December 2023, Page 102-107 PDF (256.82 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Full Length research Papers | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/fumj.2023.336865 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Mohamed Seif-ElNasr1; Asem Mosbah1; Wael Farag Ibrahim  2; Mahmoud El-Adawy1
| ||||
| 1Urology Department Fayoum University | ||||
| 2Urology department Fayoum University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Introduction: The Vienna nomogram was developed to better identify the adequate number of prostatic cores that should be taken during transrectal prostatic biopsy for better detection of prostatic tumors, depending on the patient's age and the prostatic volume. Aim of study: To compare the use of the Vienna nomogram in comparison to the standard 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate regarding the overall detection rate of cancer and complication rate. Subjects and Methods: 100 patients were eligible for the study and randomized into two equal groups: group (A) who had core number determination using Vienna nomogram and group (B) who had (12) core TRUS prostatic biopsy. Results: The rate of detection of PCa in the Vietnam nomogram group vs. the 12 core TRUS groups was 15/50 (30%) vs. 14/50 (28%), respectively. The statistical difference was insignificant. There was a statistically significant percentage of hematuria in group A, with a p-value of 0.04. The hematuria was self-limited, and regarding other complications, there wasn’t any statistically significant difference between the two study groups. Conclusions: Using the Vienna nomogram for TRUS biopsy core number determination is a safe and efficient technique for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Prostate; Vienna; nomogram; Cancer; Biopsy | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 34 PDF Download: 42 |
||||
