Assessment of Marginal Bone Loss of Early Loaded Nano Coated Hydroxyapatite Implants in Posterior Maxilla | ||||
| Advanced Dental Journal | ||||
| Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2024, Page 104-110 PDF (730.02 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjc.2023.215508.1331 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Ola Abdelsamad Amin  1; Ingy Mohamed Shehata1; Heba Moahmed Kamel2; Nader Nabil Elbokle2, 1
| ||||
| 1Oral and Maxillofacial surgery department- MSAuniversity- Giza-Egypt | ||||
| 2Oral and Maxillofacial surgery department- Cairo university- Giza-Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Aim: The aim of the study was to access the marginal bone loss after early loading of nano coated hydroxyapatite implants in posterior maxilla. Methodology: This study was conducted on nine patients with at least a missing one maxillary posterior tooth. Ten Nano-coated hydroxyapatite implants (ETIII NH implant by Hiossen) were inserted in nine patients, and then marginal bone height was measured at 4 weeks (H0) which was the time of implant loading, and 4 month (H1) post-operatively by CBCT. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed in all patients before starting the treatment to determine wither the patient is eligible for implant placement or not. 9 implants healed well except for one implant that failed in the first week due to infection. Results: There was no effect on implant’s marginal bone, the difference between marginal bone level at H0 and H1 was non-significant, (P value 0.45). Conclusion: Nano-coated hydroxyapatite implants maintained marginal bone height at 4 months (No bone loss). | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Implant; Marginal bone loss; Nano-Coated; Hydroxyapatite | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 84 PDF Download: 78 |
||||
