REFLECTION ON PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOLLOWING LATERAL OSTEOTOMIES DURING RHINOPLASTY; A COMPARISON BETWEEN PIEZOELECTRIC INSTRUMENTATION AND CONVENTIONAL OSTEOTOMES
El Abany, A., Habib, A., Warda, M., Most, S., Kosba, A. (2024). REFLECTION ON PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOLLOWING LATERAL OSTEOTOMIES DURING RHINOPLASTY; A COMPARISON BETWEEN PIEZOELECTRIC INSTRUMENTATION AND CONVENTIONAL OSTEOTOMES. EKB Journal Management System, 49(1), 74-81. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2023.194583.1352
Ahmed El Abany; Ahmed S. Habib; Mohamed Hussein Warda; Sam P. Most; Ahmed Y. Kosba. "REFLECTION ON PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOLLOWING LATERAL OSTEOTOMIES DURING RHINOPLASTY; A COMPARISON BETWEEN PIEZOELECTRIC INSTRUMENTATION AND CONVENTIONAL OSTEOTOMES". EKB Journal Management System, 49, 1, 2024, 74-81. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2023.194583.1352
El Abany, A., Habib, A., Warda, M., Most, S., Kosba, A. (2024). 'REFLECTION ON PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOLLOWING LATERAL OSTEOTOMIES DURING RHINOPLASTY; A COMPARISON BETWEEN PIEZOELECTRIC INSTRUMENTATION AND CONVENTIONAL OSTEOTOMES', EKB Journal Management System, 49(1), pp. 74-81. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2023.194583.1352
El Abany, A., Habib, A., Warda, M., Most, S., Kosba, A. REFLECTION ON PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOLLOWING LATERAL OSTEOTOMIES DURING RHINOPLASTY; A COMPARISON BETWEEN PIEZOELECTRIC INSTRUMENTATION AND CONVENTIONAL OSTEOTOMES. EKB Journal Management System, 2024; 49(1): 74-81. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2023.194583.1352

REFLECTION ON PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOLLOWING LATERAL OSTEOTOMIES DURING RHINOPLASTY; A COMPARISON BETWEEN PIEZOELECTRIC INSTRUMENTATION AND CONVENTIONAL OSTEOTOMES

Alexandria Dental Journal
Article 17, Volume 49, Issue 1, April 2024, Page 74-81  XML PDF (392.27 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2023.194583.1352
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ahmed El Abany email orcid 1; Ahmed S. Habib2; Mohamed Hussein Warda3; Sam P. Most4; Ahmed Y. Kosba2
1Department of Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
2Department of Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
3Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery , Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University , Alexandria, Egypt
4Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Abstract
Introduction
Nasal osteotomies are commonly performed in rhinoplasty. Two of the most frequently used instruments are the guarded lateral osteotomes and piezoelectric instrumentation (PEI). One method of assessing rhinoplasty results is to measure outcomes using validated questionnaires, or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Objectives
To assess the effect of conventional osteotomes and PEI on patient-reported outcome measures.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study performed on primary open rhinoplasty. Patients were divided into two groups according to technique used for nasal osteotomies. Fifteen cases were performed with conventional guarded osteotomes, and 15 were performed with PEI. Their preoperative and postoperative Standardized Cosmesis Health Nasal Outcomes survey (SCHNOS) scores, visual analog scale, functional (VAS-F) and cosmetic (VAS-C), were analyzed and compared.
Results
Thirty patients with an average age (SD) of 27.1 (8.99) years. Six men (20%) and 24 women (80%). The PEI group's mean follow-up period (PO) was 50.33 (12.13) days as opposed to conventional group's 32.77 (14.74) days. For patients managed with conventional osteotomes, all PROMs were statistically significant with the exception to SCHNOS-O. For those performed with PEI, only the cosmetic outcomes demonstrated a statistically significant change (SCHNOS-C & VAS-C). SCHNOS-C exhibited a statistically significant difference between groups when postoperative PROMs were compared. VAS-C displayed a significant change in mean between preoperative and postoperative total PROMs values in both groups.
Conclusion
On a short term follow up, no significant change is evident in regard to functional outcomes between both groups. While the SCHNOS-C scores has better results in those treated with PEI.
Keywords
Rhinoplasty; SCHNOS; VAS; Osteotomy; Piezo
Statistics
Article View: 94
PDF Download: 214