To evaluate the Anesthetic efficacy of 0.75%, 0.50% and 0.20% ropivacaine without vasoconstrictor in the minor and major Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical procedures
Lahiri, J., Garg, D., Rai, A. (2024). To evaluate the Anesthetic efficacy of 0.75%, 0.50% and 0.20% ropivacaine without vasoconstrictor in the minor and major Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical procedures. EKB Journal Management System, 15(1), 1-5. doi: 10.21608/OMX.2023.249952.1211
Jagriti Lahiri; Dev Garg; A. Rai. "To evaluate the Anesthetic efficacy of 0.75%, 0.50% and 0.20% ropivacaine without vasoconstrictor in the minor and major Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical procedures". EKB Journal Management System, 15, 1, 2024, 1-5. doi: 10.21608/OMX.2023.249952.1211
Lahiri, J., Garg, D., Rai, A. (2024). 'To evaluate the Anesthetic efficacy of 0.75%, 0.50% and 0.20% ropivacaine without vasoconstrictor in the minor and major Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical procedures', EKB Journal Management System, 15(1), pp. 1-5. doi: 10.21608/OMX.2023.249952.1211
Lahiri, J., Garg, D., Rai, A. To evaluate the Anesthetic efficacy of 0.75%, 0.50% and 0.20% ropivacaine without vasoconstrictor in the minor and major Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical procedures. EKB Journal Management System, 2024; 15(1): 1-5. doi: 10.21608/OMX.2023.249952.1211

To evaluate the Anesthetic efficacy of 0.75%, 0.50% and 0.20% ropivacaine without vasoconstrictor in the minor and major Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical procedures

Egyptian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 15, Issue 1, January 2024, Page 1-5  XML PDF (379.5 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/OMX.2023.249952.1211
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Jagriti Lahiri email orcid ; Dev Garg; A. Rai
Department Of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Maitri College of Dentistry And Research Centre, Anjora ,Durg , Dept of Oral & Maxillofacial surgery pacific dental college and hospital Debari Udaipur (Rajasthan, India)
Abstract
Objective:
• Onset of Anesthesia.
• Duration of Analgesia and Anesthesia.
• Quality of Anesthesia.
Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the Department during one year period of June 2012 – 2013 by selecting
random 75 patients. The included criteria patients were randomly allotted into three groups of 25 each and were randomly
allocated to Group I, Group II and Group III to receive local anesthesia followed by intraoral administration of Ropivacaine
and the objective criteria was evaluated.
Results: The ANNOVA test was employed to assess the impact of each concentration, and subsequent post hoc testing was
conducted to make group comparisons. Significance was denoted by P values of < 0.05 and highly significant differences by
P values of < 0.001. The total mean onset duration for subjective symptoms was 0.75% (1.240.52± minutes), 0.50% (1.801±
minute), and 0.20% (2.680.90± minutes). Objective symptoms had onset times of 0.75% (2.660.65± minutes), 0.50% (3.91.32±
minutes), and 0.20% (6.841.26± minutes). The onset of these symptoms was notably faster with the 0.75% concentration
compared to the other two concentrations.
Conclusion: The mean anesthesia durations (in hours) were maximum in case of 0.75% (8.021.11± hrs) in comparison to
other groups. The mean analgesia durations were maximum in case of 0.75% too (4.493.29± hrs). Nine patients in the 0.75%
concentration and eight patients in the 0.50% concentration reported no pain after the procedure, while 25 patients in the 0.20%
concentration experienced pain. The duration was significantly different for anesthesia (p=0.001) but not for analgesia (p=0.09)
Keywords
Onset of Anesthesia; Duration of Analgesia; Quality of Anesthesia; Ropivacaine; Pain perception
Statistics
Article View: 51
PDF Download: 49