Accuracy of digitized dental stone models using cone beam computed tomography compared to extraoral scanned models (An in vitro study) | ||||
Egyptian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | ||||
Volume 15, Issue 1, January 2024, Page 11-15 PDF (519.23 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/OMX.2024.256859.1217 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Islam Shaker 1; Youssef Sedky2; Tarek Eltayeb3; Doaa Elkady 4 | ||||
1Lecturer of oral and maxillofacial radiology ,faculty of dentistry,Misr international university | ||||
2Lecturer of orthodontics faculty of oral and dental medicine misr international university | ||||
3Lecturer of oral medicine ,periodontology and oral diagnosis faculty of oral and dental medicine misr international university | ||||
4Lecturer of prosthodontics, faculty of dentistry, Cairo university | ||||
Abstract | ||||
For accurate treatment planning, virtual surgical planning makes use of clinical data, image testing, plaster models of dental arches, and clinical pictures. Plaster model scanning can be done in two ways: using an extraoral scanner or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy digital dental stone models obtained using cone beam computed tomography and extraoral scanner. Materials and methods: The control group was the measurement performed on 20 plaster models by digital caliper. The same 20 models were scanned through extraoral scanner and CBCT in order to compare the dimensional accuracy. Six measurements were performed on each model between reference points. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in dimensional accuracy between digital models obtained by CBCT scanning and extraoral scanning compared with digital caliber measurements with higher accuracy for extraoral scanned models. Conclusion: CBCT and extraoral scanning digitized models have acceptable dimentional accuracy. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Digital models; CBCT; Extraoral scanning; Digitization | ||||
Statistics Article View: 31 PDF Download: 44 |
||||