Subjective and Objective Assessment of Lateral videofluroscopy for patients with velopharyngeal valve incompetence
Gelany, A., Elsherbiny, A., El-Adawy, A. (2017). Subjective and Objective Assessment of Lateral videofluroscopy for patients with velopharyngeal valve incompetence. EKB Journal Management System, 21(2), 11-17. doi: 10.21608/smj.2017.34622
Ahmed Elsayed Gelany; Ahmed Mohammed Elsherbiny; Ahlam Abd El-Salam El-Adawy. "Subjective and Objective Assessment of Lateral videofluroscopy for patients with velopharyngeal valve incompetence". EKB Journal Management System, 21, 2, 2017, 11-17. doi: 10.21608/smj.2017.34622
Gelany, A., Elsherbiny, A., El-Adawy, A. (2017). 'Subjective and Objective Assessment of Lateral videofluroscopy for patients with velopharyngeal valve incompetence', EKB Journal Management System, 21(2), pp. 11-17. doi: 10.21608/smj.2017.34622
Gelany, A., Elsherbiny, A., El-Adawy, A. Subjective and Objective Assessment of Lateral videofluroscopy for patients with velopharyngeal valve incompetence. EKB Journal Management System, 2017; 21(2): 11-17. doi: 10.21608/smj.2017.34622

Subjective and Objective Assessment of Lateral videofluroscopy for patients with velopharyngeal valve incompetence

Sohag Medical Journal
Article 2, Volume 21, Issue 2, July 2017, Page 11-17  XML PDF (84.58 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/smj.2017.34622
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ahmed Elsayed Gelany1; Ahmed Mohammed Elsherbiny2; Ahlam Abd El-Salam El-Adawy3
1Department of Phoniatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University
2Department of plastic surgery; Faculty of Medicine; Sohag University
3Department of Phoniatrics unit, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University
Abstract
This study was designed to comparesubjective and objective assessment of lateral videoflruroscopyin patients with velopharyngeal valve incompetence. It is prospective randomized blind study of lateral videofluroscopic recordings whether subjectively by 3 different examiners or objectively.19 consecutive patients with previously repaired cleft palates and symptomatic velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI). The results of this study no significant difference between subjective and objective evaluation of velar length (P value =0.113) or velar thickness (P value = 0.752). So subjective assessment of velar length and thickness is effective in comparison with objective assessment and further research on a big sized sample is recommended.
Keywords
Hypernasalty; Velopharyngeal valve incompetence; lateral videofluroscopy
Supplementary Files
References
  1. Armour, A., Fischbach, S., Klaiman, P. and Fisher, D. (2005):Does velopharyngeal closure patternaffect the success of pharyngeal flap pharyngoplasty? Plastic and Reconstructuve Surgery, 115, 45–52.
  2. Birch, M., Sommerlad, B.C. and Bhatt, A. (1994): Image analysis of lateral velopharyngeal closure inrepaired cleft palates and normal palates. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 47, 400–405.
  3. David, D.J. and Bagnall, A.D. (1990):Velopharyngeal incompetence. In: McCarthy; G Joseph; (Eds.), Plastic Surgery. WB Sunders Company, Philadelphia, 4: 2903-2921.
  4. Dudas, J. R., Deleyiannis, F. W., Ford, M. D., Jiang, S., andLosee, J. E. (2006): Diagnosis and treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency:Clinical utility of speech evaluation and videofluoroscopy. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 56(5), 511–517; Discussion 517.
  5. Golding-Kushner, K. J., Argamaso, R. V., Cotton, R. T., Grames, L.M., Henningsson, G., Jones, D. L. and Karnell, M. P. (1990): Standardization for the reporting ofnasopharyngoscopy and multiviewvideofluoroscopy: A report from an International Working Group. Cleft Palate Journal, 27 (4), 337–347; Discussion 347–348.
  6. Henningsson, G.E. and Isberg, A.M. (1986):Velopharyngeal movement patterns in patients alternatingbetween oral and glottal articulation: a clinical and cineradiographical study. The Cleft Palate Journal, 23 (1), 1–9.
  7. Hens, G., Sell D., Pinkstone, M., Birch, M.J., Hay, N., Sommerlad, B.C. and Kangesu, L. (2012): Palate Lengthening by BuccinatorMyomucosal Flaps for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency.Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, Vol. 50 No. 5.
  8. Kummer, A .W. (2005): Cleft palate and craniofatial anomalies: The effects on speech and resonance. Cincinnata, Ohio: WB Saunders, 401-424.
  9. Lam, D. J., Starr, J. R., Perkins, J. A., Lewis, C. W., Eblen, L. E., Dunlap, J., and Sie, K. C. (2006): A comparison of nasendoscopy and multiviewvideofluoroscopy in assessing velopharyngeal insufficiency. Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, 134(3), 394–402.
  10. Liedman-Boshko, J., Lohmander, A. and Persson, C. (2005): Perceptual analysis of speech and the activity in the lateral pharyngeal walls before and after velopharyngeal flap surgery. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, 39, 22–32.
  11. Pereira, V., Sell, D. and  Ponniah, A. (2008):Midface osteotomy versus distraction: the effect on speech, nasality and velopharyngeal function in craniofacial dysostosis. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 45, 353–363.
  12. Skolnick, M.L. (1970): Videofluoroscopic examination of the velopharyngeal portal during phonation in lateral and base projections–a new technique for studying the mechanics of closure. Cleft Palate Journal, 7, 803–816.
  13. Smith, B. E., and Kuehn, D. P. (2007): Speechevaluation of velopharyngeal dysfunction.The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 18(2),251–260.
  14. Sommerlad, B.C., Mehendale, F.V., Birch, M.J., Sell, D., Hattee, C. and Harland, K. (2002): Palate re-repair revisited. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.39:295–307.
  15. Sommerlad, B.C., Rowland, N. and Harland, K. (1994): Lateral videofluoroscopy: a modification to aid in velopharyngeal assessment and measurement. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 31, 134– 135.
  16. Ysunza, A., Pamplona, C. and Toledo, E. (1992): Change in velopharyngealvalving after speechtherapy in cleft palate patients. A videonasopharyngoscopic and multi-view videofluoroscopic study.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 24, 45–54.
Statistics
Article View: 140
PDF Download: 265