Virtual CT Colonography: Technique and findings: Single Institute experience. | ||||
| Sohag Medical Journal | ||||
| Article 5, Volume 22, Issue 1, January 2018, Page 45-52 PDF (145.41 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/smj.2018.34677 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Hossam saro; khaled Fawzy Alkhayat; Mohammed Al Sayed; Mohammed Zaki Ali | ||||
| Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of death due to malignancy in industrialized counties. It is argued that most large bowel malignancies arise from preexisting adenormas. Computed tomographic (CT) colonography is a noninvasive, rapidly evolving technique that has been shown in some studies to be comparable with conventional colonoscopy for the screening of colorectal cancer. However, widespread colorectal screening and preventive efforts aimed at detecting disease in this early stage are opposed by several practical obstacles, including limited resources, and poor patient acceptance and therefore poor compliance (1-2). Patients and methods | ||||
|
Supplementary Files
|
||||
| References | ||||
|
1- Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE. Colorectal lesions: Evaluation by CT colonography. RadioGraphics 1997; 1:1157-1167.
2- Silva AC, Hara AK, Leighton JA, Heppell JP. CT Colonography with Intravenous Contrast Material: Varied Appearances of Colorectal Carcinoma. RadioGraphics 2005; 25:1321–1334.
3- Mang T, Maier A, Plank C, Mueller-Mang C, Herold C, Schima W. Pitfalls in Multi–Detector Row CT Colonography: A Systematic Approach. RadioGraphics 2007; 27:431–454
4- Taylor SA, Halligan S, Bartram CI. CT colonography: methods, pathology and pitfalls. Clin Radiol 2003;58:179–90.
5- Laghi A. Virtual colonoscopy: clinical application. Eur Radiol 2005;15(Suppl 4):D138–41.
6- Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Krueger WR, et al. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: feasibility of simultaneous evaluation for metastatic disease, local recurrence, and metachronous neoplasia in colorectal carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:283–90.
7- Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M, Dewyspelaere J, van Holsbeeck B. Diverticular disease in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2003;13(Suppl 4):L62–74.
8- Sosna J, Blachar A, Amitai M, et al. Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. Radiology 2006;239:457–63.
9- Royster AP, Fenlon HM, Clarke PD, Nunes DP, Ferrucci JT. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1237–42.
10- Rogalla P, Lembcke A, Ruckert JC, et al. Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon. Radiology 2005;236:184–8.
11- Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191–200.
12- Yee J, Kumar NN, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Kumar PR, Wall SD. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 2003;226:653–61.
13- Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT. Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:786–92
14- Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.Radiology 2002;224:383–92.
15- Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 2000;217:765–71.
16- Dachman AH,Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM, et al. CTcolonography with three dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:989–95.
17- Fenlon HM, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. Virtual colonoscopy: imaging features with colonoscopic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1303–9.
18- Laks S, Macari M, Bini EJ. Positional change in colon polyps at CT colonography. Radiology 2004;231:761–6.
19- Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA, et al. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2003;124:911–6.
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 212 PDF Download: 248 |
||||
