Performance of illiterate and low-educated Egyptian elderly in SLUMS (Saint Louis University Mental Status) Examination. | ||||
| The Egyptian Journal of Geriatrics and Gerontology | ||||
| Volume 10, Issue 2, October 2023, Page 175-184 PDF (251.35 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ejgg.2023.350128 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Doaa Sayed Hanafi* ; Adel Taha Alloush; Mohamed Ahmed Alsadany; Shereen Moustafa Mousa | ||||
| Geriatrics and Gerontology Department Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt Abstract | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: The use of cognitive assessment tools originally designed for affluent nations in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) has faced criticism due to potential cultural, educational, and literacy biases. Such adaptations may lead to misclassification and an inflated perception of dementia prevalence. There is a pressing need for further research to create cognitive assessment instruments and dementia diagnosis methods which are suitable as well as practical for clinical application in low- and middle-income countries environments. Aim: This study aimed to assess the efficiency of the Arabic version of the Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) examination in a sample of illiterate and low-educated Egyptians in comparison to the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) for the detection of cognitive impairment. Subjects and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study that included ninety elderly participants, aged 60 years and above, who attended the Geriatric outpatients’ clinic at Ahmed Shawki-Geriatric Medicine Hospital, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt. The elderly participants had either normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia, defined as a CDR score of 0-1. Our participants were classified as illiterates, 1-6 years of education, and 7-9 years of education for further analysis. All participants had a comprehensive geriatrics assessment and cognitive assessment with the Arabic version of the CDR and the Arabic version of the SLUMS. Results: The study showed that the Arabic version of SLUMS had a high sensitivity of 95.4%, but with a low specificity of 38.3% for detection of mild cognitive impairment in illiterate and low-educated Egyptian elderly. Conclusion: SLUMS is a valid yet not the best tool to screen for cognitive impairment and dementia in the illiterate and low-educated Egyptian elderly. . | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS); mild cognitive impairment; Low Educated; Illiterate; Egyptians | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 181 PDF Download: 172 |
||||
