Rasping First Technique in Otoplasty
Abdelhalim, M., Elshahat, A. (2024). Rasping First Technique in Otoplasty. EKB Journal Management System, 48(2), 121-127. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2024.352133
Mohamed Abdelhalim; Ahmed Elshahat. "Rasping First Technique in Otoplasty". EKB Journal Management System, 48, 2, 2024, 121-127. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2024.352133
Abdelhalim, M., Elshahat, A. (2024). 'Rasping First Technique in Otoplasty', EKB Journal Management System, 48(2), pp. 121-127. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2024.352133
Abdelhalim, M., Elshahat, A. Rasping First Technique in Otoplasty. EKB Journal Management System, 2024; 48(2): 121-127. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2024.352133

Rasping First Technique in Otoplasty

The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Article 6, Volume 48, Issue 2, April 2024, Page 121-127  XML PDF (819.45 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2024.352133
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed Abdelhalim email orcid ; Ahmed Elshahat email orcid
The Department of Plastic, Burn and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University
Abstract
Background: There have been more than 200 techniques
published for the treatment of prominent ears, demonstrating
that there is not a single, used method that most surgeons use.
Due to the psychosocial issues, it generates, prominent ear
deformity is one of the aesthetic issues that should be reconstructed.
An optimal otoplasty operation should produce good
maintained aesthetic results with no recurrence.
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate patient satisfaction
after otoplasty using the rasping as the first step in
otoplasty.
Patients and Methods: This is an interventional clinical
trial including forty individuals with prominent ears. All patients
were operated on at El Dmerdash Hospital according to
our study’s inclusion and exclusion criteria using rasping of
cartilage as the first step in our technique.
Results: Using anterior rasping as first step in otoplasty
achieve a high patients’ satisfaction rate postoperatively and
facilitate the surgical steps. most of our patients were satisfied
with the ear in general and, (90%) were satisfied with right ear
and (92.5%) were satisfied with left ear. Patients were satisfied
with ear fitting with face as (95 %) with right ear and (90%)
regarding left ear with Significant improvement in post operative
symmetry p < 0.001.
Conclusion: Using rasping as first step in otoplasty improves
aesthetic outcomes in adults. Anterior rasping decreases
blood loss shortens operative time and decreases the incidence
of recurrence through weakening of cartilage memory. adequate
weakening of cartilage through anterior rasping corrected
the protrusion, improved the symmetry, and maintained it.
Keywords
Otoplasty; Rasping; Cartilage
References
Bajaj Y., Rokade A. and De P.R.: Otoplasty: Experience
with modification using a drill, and literature review. J.
Laryngeal Otol., 121 (1): 61-64.9, 2007.
2- Gümüş N. and Yılmaz S.: Otoplasty with an unusual cartilage
scoring approach. J. Plast Surg. Hand Surg., 50 (1):
19-24, 2016.
3- Janz B.A., Cole P., Hollier L.H. Jr. and Stal S.: Treatment
of prominent and constricted ear anomalies. Plast Reconstructive
Surgery, 124 (1 Suppl): 27e-37e, 2009.
4- Karmody C.S. and Annino D.J. Jr.: Embryology and
anomalies of the external ear. Facial Plast Surg., 11 (4):
251-256, 1995.
5- Manstein C.H.: Congenital ear deformities (online); 2018.
article/1288708-overview. Accessed September 5, 2018.
6- Fu Y.Y., Li C.L., Zhang J.L. and Zhang T.Y.: Autologous
cartilage microtia reconstruction: Complications and risk
factors. Int. J. Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 116: 1-6,
2019.
7- Cuccolo N.G., Zwierstra M.J., Ibrahim A.M.S., Peymani
A., Afshar S. and Lin S.J.: Reconstruction of congenital
microtia and anotia: Analysis of practitioner epidemiology
and postoperative outcomes. Plast Reconstructive Surgery
Glob Open, 7 (6): e2318, 2019.
8- Gibson T. and Davis W.B.: The distortion of autogenous
cartilage grafts: Its cause and prevention. British Journal
of Plastic Surgery, 10: 257-274, 1957.
9- Stenstrom S.J.: Cosmetic deformities of the ears. In Grabb.
W. C. and Smith. J. W. (Eds) Plastic Surgery: A Concise
Guide to Clinical Practice. 2nd Edition. Boston: Little.
Brown & Co. pp 6033604, 1973.
10- Chongchet V.: A method of antihelix reconstruction. British
Journal of Plastic Surgery, 16, 268, 1963.
11- Mustard J.C.: The correction of prominent ears using simple
mattress sutures, 1963.
12- British Furnas, David W. M.D.: Correction of prominent
ears by concha-mastoid sutures. Plastic and Reconstructive
Surgery, 42 (3): p 189-194, September. Journal of
Plastic Surgery, 16, 170, 1968.
13- Spira M., McCrea R., Gerow F.J. and Hardy S.B.: Correction
of the principal deformities causing protruding ears.
Plast Reconstructive Surgery, 44: 150, 1969.
14- Jeffery S.L.: Complications following correction of prominent
ears: An audit review of 122 cases. Bu. J. Plast Surgery,
52: 588, 1999.
15- Mustarde J.C.: The correction of prominent ears by buried
mattress sutures: A ten-year survey. Plast Reconstructive
Surgery, 39: 382, 19б7
16- Spira M.: Otoplasty: What I do now A 30-year perspective.
Plast Reconstructive Surgery, 104: 834, 1999.
17- Stenstrom S.J.: A ‘‘natural ‘‘technique for correction of
congenitally prominent ears. Plast Reconstructive Surgery,
32: 509, 19б3.
18- Tan H.H.: Long-term survey of prominent ear surgery: A
comparison of two methods. Bu. J. Plast Surgery, 39: 270,
1986.
19- Thomas S.S. and Fatah F.: Closed anterior scoring for
prominent-ear correction revisited. Bu. J. Plast Surgery,
54: 581, 2001.
20- Adamson P.A. and Strecker H.D.: Otoplasty techniques.
Fac. Plast Surgery, 11: 284,

Statistics
Article View: 20
PDF Download: 13