Volumetric Bone Regeneration Of Maxillary Cystic Defect Grafted With Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Nano Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Graft Mixed With Platelet Rich Fibrin A Randomized Clinical Trial
ElSayed, O., Mohamed Hossam Eldin, A., Mansour, M., Mohamed Chehata, I., Almoghazy, H. (2024). Volumetric Bone Regeneration Of Maxillary Cystic Defect Grafted With Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Nano Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Graft Mixed With Platelet Rich Fibrin A Randomized Clinical Trial. EKB Journal Management System, 3(2), 21-31. doi: 10.21608/msadj.2024.295721.1038
Omnia ElSayed; Ahmed Mohamed Hossam Eldin; Mahitab Mansour; Ingy Mohamed Chehata; Hinar Almoghazy. "Volumetric Bone Regeneration Of Maxillary Cystic Defect Grafted With Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Nano Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Graft Mixed With Platelet Rich Fibrin A Randomized Clinical Trial". EKB Journal Management System, 3, 2, 2024, 21-31. doi: 10.21608/msadj.2024.295721.1038
ElSayed, O., Mohamed Hossam Eldin, A., Mansour, M., Mohamed Chehata, I., Almoghazy, H. (2024). 'Volumetric Bone Regeneration Of Maxillary Cystic Defect Grafted With Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Nano Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Graft Mixed With Platelet Rich Fibrin A Randomized Clinical Trial', EKB Journal Management System, 3(2), pp. 21-31. doi: 10.21608/msadj.2024.295721.1038
ElSayed, O., Mohamed Hossam Eldin, A., Mansour, M., Mohamed Chehata, I., Almoghazy, H. Volumetric Bone Regeneration Of Maxillary Cystic Defect Grafted With Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Nano Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Graft Mixed With Platelet Rich Fibrin A Randomized Clinical Trial. EKB Journal Management System, 2024; 3(2): 21-31. doi: 10.21608/msadj.2024.295721.1038

Volumetric Bone Regeneration Of Maxillary Cystic Defect Grafted With Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Nano Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Graft Mixed With Platelet Rich Fibrin A Randomized Clinical Trial

MSA Dental Journal
Volume 3, Issue 2, April 2024, Page 21-31  XML PDF (1.06 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/msadj.2024.295721.1038
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Omnia ElSayed email 1; Ahmed Mohamed Hossam Eldin2; Mahitab Mansour3; Ingy Mohamed Chehata4; Hinar Almoghazy5
1Department of oral & maxillofacial surgery .MSA university
2MSA University
3Lecturer of dental biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, MSA University
4Associate Professor of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, MSA University
5Lecturer, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry. October University for Modern Sciences and Arts, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
Background: One of the most prevalent conditions in the oral and maxillofacial region is jaw cysts. Enucleation of cysts is a commonly embraced treatment method which may result in bony irregularities that need to be filled with grafting material. The purpose of this study was to evaluate bone regeneration of maxillary cystic defects grafted with mineralized Plasmatic matrix in comparison to nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bone graft mixed with platelet rich fibrin.
Patients & Methods: a randomized controlled clinical trial conducted on 16 subjects (6 females and 10 males) collected from the outpatient clinic of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, October University of Modern Sciences and Arts. Allocated to one of two equal groups: Group (I): received a mineralized Plasmatic matrix (MPM). Group (II): received a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (nHA) bone graft mixed with platelet-rich fibrin. Defects sizes, volumetric bone fill & bone density will be evaluated by CBCT at 6 months post-operative to determine the amount of bone fill & healing.

Results: Indicate improvements in the healing of bone defects and increase in bone density observed in both MPM group & nHA group. nHA group showed statistically significant decrease of cyst sizes & volume than MPM group. In terms of bone density nHA group had statistically significant higher density levels than MPM.

Conclusion: It was concluded that cavities filled with a combination of nHA mixed with PRF achieved better bone fill compared to those treated with MPM.
Keywords
Maxillary cysts; bone regeneration; PRP; mineralized Plasmatic matrix (MPM); nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bone graft (nHA)
Statistics
Article View: 45
PDF Download: 48