Laparoscopic Hartmann reversal: A single center experience in a developing country | ||||
The Egyptian Journal of Surgery | ||||
Volume 43, Issue 3, July 2024, Page 764-770 PDF (494.88 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/EJSUR.2024.357125 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Emad M. Abdelrahman ![]() | ||||
Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background: In colorectal surgery, one of the trickiest techniques is the Hartmann reversal. The rate of anastomosis leaking varies. Minimally invasive surgeries like laparoscopic Hartmann reversal (LHR) have become more popular because of lower morbidities. The aim of this study was to report our institutional experience in LHR. Patients and Methods: The current prospective randomized study included 62 patients who were eligible for HR. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group A (n=31) underwent LHR, while group B underwent open Hartmann reversal. Follow-up was planned for at least 6 months. Results: The mean age was 45.72±15.12 and 42.66±14.91 in groups A and B, respectively. There was a statistically significant longer mean operative time with more mean blood loss in group B (P≤0.001) with a significantly longer hospital stay. The postoperative complications, including wound infection, dehiscence, seroma, intestinal leak, ileus, and incisional hernia, were evident in group B when compared to group A (P≤0.001). Conclusion: Well-chosen patient makes (HR) a safe and beneficial technique for improving a patient’s quality of life. Patients can get substantial benefits with minimally invasive procedures, such as a quicker recovery with fewer operating hours, less projected blood loss, a shorter time to flatus, less pain following surgery, and a shorter hospital stay. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Hartmann procedure; laparoscopic Hartmann reversal; open Hartmann reversal | ||||
Statistics Article View: 28 PDF Download: 37 |
||||