Prevalence of Keratoconus in Refractive Surgery Population in Sohag Governorate
Saro, A., Radwan, G., Ismail, A., Abozaid, M. (2017). Prevalence of Keratoconus in Refractive Surgery Population in Sohag Governorate. EKB Journal Management System, 21(1), 41-44. doi: 10.21608/smj.2017.38956
Adham Saro; Gamal Abdellatif Radwan; Ali Mahmoud Ismail; Mortada Abozaid. "Prevalence of Keratoconus in Refractive Surgery Population in Sohag Governorate". EKB Journal Management System, 21, 1, 2017, 41-44. doi: 10.21608/smj.2017.38956
Saro, A., Radwan, G., Ismail, A., Abozaid, M. (2017). 'Prevalence of Keratoconus in Refractive Surgery Population in Sohag Governorate', EKB Journal Management System, 21(1), pp. 41-44. doi: 10.21608/smj.2017.38956
Saro, A., Radwan, G., Ismail, A., Abozaid, M. Prevalence of Keratoconus in Refractive Surgery Population in Sohag Governorate. EKB Journal Management System, 2017; 21(1): 41-44. doi: 10.21608/smj.2017.38956

Prevalence of Keratoconus in Refractive Surgery Population in Sohag Governorate

Sohag Medical Journal
Article 5, Volume 21, Issue 1, January 2017, Page 41-44  XML PDF (61.2 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/smj.2017.38956
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Adham Saro1; Gamal Abdellatif Radwan1; Ali Mahmoud Ismail2; Mortada Abozaid1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University.
2Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University.
Abstract
IntroductionKeratoconus (KC) is a developmental anomaly in which the inferior or central portion of the cornea becomes thinner and bulges forward in a cone-shaped fashion as a result of non-inflammatory thinning of the corneal stroma[1, 2].                                                                                      
The disease has its usual onset at puberty and, in many cases, progresses until the third to fourth decade of life, when it usually arrests[1]. Although a large proportion of keratoconic patients can be managed with contact lenses, an average of about 20% of all keratoconic corneas require keratoplasty; some authors report markedly different surgical indication rates of 6.5 and 12 to 45%.[3-5]                         
Aim of the work: to study the prevalence of keratoconus in patients seeking refractive surgery to correct their refractive errors and to study common risk factors.
Patients and Methods: Two thousand eyes to 1202 patients (623 males and 579 females) coming for investigations for refractive surgery were randomly chosen in the period from April to October 2015. Screening –by Pentacam- was bilateral in 798 patients and unilateral in 404 patients.
Results: the resulting cases of keratoconus were 293 eyes (14.65%) of 210 patients. Of those patients, males were 117 (165 eyes) (56.25%) and females were 93 (128 eyes) (43.75%).
Keywords
Keratoconus- Pentacam; prevalence- pachymetry- Keratometry
Supplementary Files
References

Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW, Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol 1984;28:293-322.

2.    Tuft SJ, Moodaley LC, Gregory WM, et al., Prognostic factors for the progression of keratoconus. Ophthalmology 1994;101:439-47.

3.    A, Ihalainen, Clinical and epidemiological features of keratoconus genetic and external factors in the pathogenesis of the disease. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 1986;178:1-64.

4.    Gordon MO, Steger-May K, Szczotka-Flynn L, et al. , Baseline factors predictive of incident penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:923-30.

5.    Ota R, Fujiki K, Nakayasu K., Estimation of patient visit rate and incidence of keratoconus in the 23 wards of Tokyo. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2002;106:365-72.

6.    HW, Hofstetter, A keratoscopic survey of 13,395 eyes. . Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1959;36:3–11.

7.    Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA.,A 48-year clinical and epidemiological

      study of keratoconus.Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101:267–73.

8.    Jonas JB, Nangia V, Matin A et al., Prevalence and associations of keratoconus in rural Maharashtra in

central India. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:760–5.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.    Assiri AA, Yousuf BI, Quantok AJ et al., Incidence and severity of keratoconus in Asir province, Saudi Arabia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1403–6.

10.  Nielsen K, Hjortdal J, Aagard NE, Niels E. Incidence and prevalence of keratoconus in Denmark. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:890–2. .

11.  Tanabe U, Fujiki K, Ogawa A, Prevalence of keratoconus patients in Japan. . Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1985;89:407–11.

12.  Gorskova EN, Sevost’ianov EN, Epidemiology of keratoconus in the Urals. Vestn Oftalmol. 1998;114:38–40.

13.  L. Lim, R. H. Wei, W. K. Chan, and D. T. H. Tan, Evaluation of keratoconus in Asians: role of Orbscan II and Tomey TMS-2 corneal topography. The American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 390–400, 2007.

14.  A. M. Bawazeer, W. G. Hodge, and B. Lorimer, Atopy and keratoconus: a multivariate analysis. British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 84, no. 8, pp. 834–836, 2000.

15.  F. P. Eggink, A. J. L. G. Pinckers, and E. P. van Puyenbroek, Keratoconus, a retrospective study. Contact Lens Journal, vol. 16, pp. 204–306, 1998.

16.  Boneham, C. W. Mcmonnies and G. C., Keratoconus, allergy, itch, eye-rubbing and hand-dominance. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 376–384, 2003.

Statistics
Article View: 189
PDF Download: 256