EFFECT OF NANOTECHNOLOGY OF POTASSIUM FERTILIZER BY INJECTING MAGNETIZED WATER THROUGH DRIP IRRIGATION ON SUGAR BEET CROP | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 5, Volume 42, Issue 1, January 2025, Page 63-78 PDF (771.89 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2024.337801.1152 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
S. H. Abdou  1; S. M. Mahmoud1; N. E. Salama2
| ||||
| 1Assist. Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Ain Shams U., Qalyubia, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Res. Sugar Crops Res. Inst., Ag. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The field experiment was conducted in Wadi El Natrunq (latitude 30.23⁰N, longitude 30.21⁰E, and elevation 17.98 m above sea level), Beheira Governorate, Egypt, during the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 growing seasons to study the productivity and quality of sugar beet crop under nano potassium magnetic water and drip irrigation system. The multi-embryo sugar beet variety "Fayrouz" was planted during the first week of October and harvested after 175 days. The field experiment treatments were studied for the effect of magnetic water (MW), and non-magnetic water (nMW). The second treatment used five percentages of potassium with nano potassium, which is (100% potassium, 75% potassium + 25% Nano potassium, 50% potassium + 50% Nano potassium, 25% potassium + 75% nano potassium and 100% nano potassium) respectively. The highest averages of sucrose remaining sugar in molasses, extracted sugar, and quality index were recorded (20.24, 2.27, 17.42, and 88.29) % respectively, with magnetic water by adding (75% potassium + 25% nano potassium). The highest productivity of root and the amount of sugar produced by the crop were (13.88 and 2.41) tons.fed-1, with magnetic water and adding (75% potassium + 25% nano potassium). It was the highest efficiency (8.73, and 6.52) kg.m-3 for the first and second seasons, respectively, with magnetic water and the addition of (75% potassium + 25% nano potassium). | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Sugar beet; Yield Productivity; Magnetic water; Nano-fertilizer | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Arroyo, J.; Urbano, P; Rojo, C. and Gonzalez, F., 1999. Irrigation of sugar beet: comparative study between drip irrigation and sprinklers. Agricultura, Revista. Agropecuaria., 68(3): 490-493.
Amiri, C. and Dadkhah, A., 2006. On reduction in the surface tension of water due to magnetic treatment. Colloid Surf. A 278 (1–3), 252–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. colsurfa.2005.12.046.
Azimi, M., 2016. Study of Sugar Transplanting in Order to Save Water Consumption. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran (In Persian with English Summary).
Brien, A.; Daudi, A; Butt, S. and Bolwell, P., 2012. Reactive oxygen species and their role in plant defense and cell wall metabolism. Planta., 236(3): 765-790.
Cooke, J.; Hickok, G.; Vanderwoude, J.; Banks, A. and Scott, J., 1993. Photobiological characterization of a spore germination mutant dkgl with reversed photo regulation in the fern Ceratopteris richardii. Photochemistry and photobiology, 57, 1032-1041.
Da Silva, T. and Dobranszki, J., 2014. Impact of magnetic water on plant growth. Environ. Exp. Biol. 12 (1), 137–142. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28 0316318).
Da Silva, T. and Dobranszki, J., 2016. Magnetic fields: how is plant growth and development impacted? Protoplasma 253, 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00709-015-0820-7.
Devillers, J., 1988. Acute toxicity of cresols, xylenols, and trimethylphenols to daphnia magna Straus 1820. Science of the total environment, 76(1), 79-83.
Dewdar, M.; Abbas, S.; El-Hassanin, S. and Abd El-Aleem, A., 2018. Effect of nano micronutrients and nitrogen foliar applications on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) of quantity and quality traits in marginal soils in Egypt. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(08), 4490-8.
Dexter, T.; Frakes, G. and Snyder, W., 1967. A rapid and practical method of determining extractable white sugar may be applied to the evaluation of agronomic practices and grower deliveries in the sugar beet industry. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol, 14(5), 433-454.
Ding, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, F.; Chen, J. and Duan, S., 2011. Magnetization mechanism of magnetized water. Acta Phys. Sin. 60 (6), 432–439. https://doi.org/10.7498/ aps.60.064701.
El-Saadony, T.; ALmoshadak, S.; Shafi, E.; Albaqami, M.; Saad, M.; El-Tahan, M., and Helmy, M., 2021. Vital roles of sustainable nano-fertilizers in improving plant quality and quantity-an updated review. Saudi journal of biological sciences, 28(12), 7349-7359.
Esmaeilnezhad, E.; Choi, J.; Schaffie, M.; Gholizadeh, M. and Ranjbar, M., 2017. Characteristics and applications of magnetized water as a green technology. J. Clean. Prod. 161 (10), 908–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.166.
Etemadi A., 2000. Effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilization on yield and quality of sugar beet in a greenhouse. Sugar Beet Journal of Agricultural Research, 78, 759–767.
FAO AQUASTAT., 2021. FAO's Information System on Water and Agriculture: Climate Information tool. AQUASTAT Climate characteristics. www.fao.org/aquastat/en/geospatial-information.
FAO report sugar., 2020. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC, (Accessed 3 March 2024.
Farhaoui, A.; Adadi, A.; Tahiri, N.; El Alami, S.; Khayi, R.; Mentag, S.; Ezrari, R.; Nabil, F.; Mokrini, Z. and Belabess, R., 2022 Biocontrol potential of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) against Sclerotiorum rolfsii diseases on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 101829, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2022.101829.
Farhaoui, A.; El Alami, M.; Khadiri, S.; Ezrari, N.; Radouane, M.; Baala, A. and Tahiri, R., 2023. Biological control of diseases caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2 in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 101966.
Gomez, N. and Gomezz, A., 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Int., New York, PP: 95-109.
Hafsi, C.; Debez, A. and Abdelly, C., 2014. Potassium deficiency in plants: effects and signaling cascades. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 36(5), 1055-1070.
Haque, M. and Parvin, M., 2021. Sugar beet, it ‘disease Rhizoctonia root rot, and potential biological agents. Agricultural and Biological Research, 37(1), 96-101.
Hegazi, M. M., 2024. Personal communication. Prof. of Agri. Eng., Ain Shams University. mahmoudhegazi47@gmail.com.
Jasim, H.; Sura, R. and Hanaa, M., 2020. Effect of skip irrigation and nano potassium treatments on maize yield. Journal of Eco-Environmental Consultants, 26(3), 10-15.
Jolayemi, L., 2019. Enhancing sugar beet’s early growth and establishment by using protein-based biostimulants. https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/16382. (Accessed 3 March 2024).
Khozaei, M.; Haghighi, K.; Parsa, Z.; Sepaskhah, R.; Razzaghi, F.; Yousefabadi, A. and Emam, Y., 2020. Evaluation of direct seeding and transplanting in sugar beet for water productivity, yield and quality under different irrigation regimes and planting densities. Agric. Water Manage. 238, 106230 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. agwat.2020.106230.
Le Docte, A., 1977. Commercial determination of sugar in sugar beet using the socks. Sugar J, 29, 488-492.
Maheshwari, L. and Grewal, S., 2009. Magnetic treatment of irrigation water: Its effects on vegetable crop yield and water productivity. Agricultural water management, 96(8), 1229-1236.
Manjunatha, B.; Biradar, P. and Aladakatti, R., 2016. Nanotechnology and its applications in agriculture. J farm Sci., 29(1): 257-299.
Selim, H. and El-Nady, F., 2011. Physio-anatomical responses of drought-stressed tomato plants to magnetic field. Acta Astronaut 69 (7–8), 387–396. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.05.025.
Sharmasarkar, F., 2001. Assessment of drip and flood irrigation on water and fertilizer use efficiencies for sugarbeets. Agricultural water management 46.3: 241-251.
Snedecor, W. and Cochran, G., 1980. Statistical Methods. 7th Ed. Lowa State Univ. Press, Lowa, USA.
Surendran, U.; Sandeep, O. and Joseph, J., 2016. The impacts of magnetic treatment of irrigation water on plant, water and soil characteristics. Agricultural water management, 178, 21-29.
Toledo, L.; Ramalho, C. and Magriotis, M., 2008. Influence of magnetic field on physical-chemical properties of liquid water: insights from experimental and theoretical models. J. Mol. Struct. 888 (1–3), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. molstruc.2008.01.010.
Wang, G.; Hua, X.; Ji, C.; Hong, C.; Shan, C.; Di, W.; Qiu, Y.; Qiu, H. and Yan, C., 2015. Effects of potassium deficiency on photosynthesis and photoprotection mechanisms in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14, 856–863.
Zangeneh, N. and Rasouli, A., 2018. Effect of potassium fertilizers and humic acid on the pigments and activity of antioxidants in grape' Bidaneh Sefid'.
Zhang, Y.; Nan, J. and Yu, B., 2016. OMICS technologies and applications in sugar beet. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 900.
Zhu, X.; Han, B.; Song, B. and Yang, J., 2020. Effect of extending seedling-raising period on yield of transplanting sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) in black soil area of Northeast China. Sugar Tech 22 (6), 1103–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00862-7. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 192 PDF Download: 115 |
||||
