Pattern of Renal involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients in Sohag University Hospitals | ||||
| Sohag Medical Journal | ||||
| Article 50, Volume 22, Issue 3, October 2018, Page 415-420 PDF (63.6 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/smj.2018.39838 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Hassan Ahmed Hassanin1; Nayel Abd ELhameed Zaki1; Mahmoud Kamal Elsamman2; Youhanna Gad Awad3 | ||||
| 1Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University. | ||||
| 2Department of Internal medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University. | ||||
| 3Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: Systemic Lupus Erythematosusis asystemic disease characterized by multiple system affection,each system affected has apathognomonic features for lupus affection,renal involvement have variable patterns in SLE and tretment vary accordingly. Objective: The objective of this study is to study pattern of renal involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients in Sohag University Hospitals . Materials &Methods:This study was performed on 100 patients with SLE who fulfiled the clinical and laboratory criteria of (Modified american colleague of rheumatology for SLE diagnosis-1997)admitted to Sohag University Hospital and those of outpatients clinic were studied by means of a retrospective review of their records, Patients were analyzed according to their clinical symptoms and laboratory profile which included complete blood counts, serum creatinine and electrolytes, ESR, total proteins, 24 hour urinary proteins, creatinine clearance, anti nuclear factor and anti-DNA. Results of renal biopsy which were performed by light microscopy study were revised.Results: The study revealed that class( 2) were 46 patients (46%) all of them were females.Class (3) were 36 patients (36%), 33 of them were females, 3 patients were males.Class (4) were 14 patients (14%) all of them were females .Class (5) were 4 patients ( 4% ) all of them were females .According to proteinuria between classes of renal biopsy , 24 h urinary protein was > .5 g in all patients of class 5 (100%) .Class (3) and class (4) the same range (about 92%), class 2 about (84%).Conclusion: Our study in Sohag University Hospitals was in 100 patients revealed that roughly number of rural patients equal to urban patients , also revealed that the most common renal biopsy class is the class (2) in our locality and that the most common symptoms associated with renal involvement is arthritis followed by oral ulceration. Anaemia affect most of our patients in Sohag and thrombocytopenia very common between them , our study show that proteinuria increased markedly by increasing grades of renal biopsy with low response to treatment, this may explained by non compliance of our patients to treatment . | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| SLE; Renal involvement | ||||
|
Supplementary Files
|
||||
| References | ||||
|
1. Ju, J. H. et al. Prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus in South Korea: an administrative database study. J. Epidemiol. 24, 1295–1303 (2014).
2. Shim, J. S., Sung, Y. K., Joo, Y. B., Lee, H. S. & Bae, S. C. Prevalence and incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus in South Korea. Rheumatol. Int. 34, 909–917 (2014).
3. Markowitz GS, D’Agati VD. The ISN/RPS 2003 classification of lupus nephritis: an assessment at 3 years. Kidney Int 2016; 71:491–5.
4. Hiramatsu N, Kuroiwa T, Ikeuchi H, Maeshima A, Kaneko Y, Hiromura K, et al. Revised classification of lupus nephritis is valuable in predicting renal outcome with an indication of the proportion of glomeruli affected by chronic lesions. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017;47:702–7.
5. Ali SS, Rabbani MA, SSM Moinuddin S Virani, Farooque F, Salam A, Ahmad, Pakistan,2015.
6.Anay J M et al17, in across-sectional multicenter study in Colombia,2016.
7.Wallace DJ, Podell TE, Weiner JM, Cox MB, Klinenberg JR, Forouzesh S, et al.Lupus nephritis,2016.
8.Malaviya AN, Chandrasekaran AN, Kuamr A, Sharma PN. Systemic lupus erythematosus in India. Lupus 2009.
9.Julian T, Uramoto, W. Michael O' Fallon. A Comparative Study of the Clinical Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Caucasians in Rochester, Minnesota, and Chinese in Singapore, From 1980 to 1992. Arthritis Care & Research 2012.
10.Uthman IW, Muffarij AA, Mudawar WA, Nasr FW, A-FM Masri Lupus nephritis in Lebanon, Lupus 2011.
11.Hochberg MC Boyd RE, Ahearn JM, Arnett FC, Bias WB, Provost TT,Stevens MB. Systemic lupus erythematosus: a review of clinico-laboratory features and immunogenetic markers in 150 patients with emphasis on demographic subsets. Medicine (Baltimore) 2012.
12.Suliaman K, Sohail KS, Raza F, Siddiqur A. Clinacal spectrum of SLE at Aga Khan University Hospital. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014;50:3647.
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 208 PDF Download: 293 |
||||
