ASSESSMENT OF THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF SMART DENTINE REPLACEMENT, BIODENTINE AND FUJI LINERS IN RESTORING PERMANENT TEETH: AN INVITRO STUDY | ||||
Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
Volume 71, Issue 1, January 2025, Page 121-126 PDF (602.33 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2024.340932.3284 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Alaa Yasser Elsheikh ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||||
1MSc Student, Pediatric dentistry and dental public health department , New Giza University , Egypt | ||||
2Professor of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University | ||||
3Associate Professor, Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Aim of the study: assessment of the microhardness of Smart Dentine Replacement, Biodentine and Fuji liners in restoring permanent teeth. Methodology: For each test 27 samples were done for the vicker hardness test using circular split teflon mold with outer metallic ring (with outer ring 20mm diameter and 2 mm thickness was used to prepare the samples). Surface microhardness was measured using digital display Vickers micro-hardness tester. A load of 100g was applied to the surface of the specimens for a duration of 15 seconds. The indentations were spaced at least 0.5 mm apart. The diagonal lengths of these indentations were measured using built-in scaled microscope, and the Vickers values were converted into micro-hardness values. Results: For vicker hardness there was a significant difference between different groups, The highest value was found in SDR (79.99±4.10A) followed by Fuji II (60.80±1.87B) while the lowest value was found at Biodentine (51.73±2.78C). Conclusions: Smart dentine replacement has the highest value in vicker test. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
KEYWORDS: Smart Dentine Replacement (SDR); Microhardness; Vickers hardness; Biodentine; Fuji II | ||||
Statistics Article View: 202 PDF Download: 96 |
||||