Effect Of Using Two Different Attachment Systems On The Marginal Bone Height And Patient Satisfaction In Two Splinted Implants With Cantilever Bar Retaining Mandibular Overdenture (A Randomized Clinical Study) | ||||
Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
Volume 71, Issue 1 - Serial Number 4, January 2025, Page 419-428 PDF (1.21 MB) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2024.312827.3167 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Mohamed Hakim ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||||
1Associate Professor of Prosthodontics-Beni-Suef University | ||||
2Lecturer of Prosthodontics – Minia University | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Abstract: Aim of the study: To evaluate the effect of using two different attachment systems on marginal bone height & patient satisfaction in two implant retained mandibular overdentures (IOD) with cantilever extension. Materials & Methods: Fourteen completely edentulous patients were selected from the out-patient clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Beni-Suef University. Patients were rehabilitated with maxillary complete denture & mandibular implant overdenture with two different attachment systems. Group (I): Received two IOD with cantilevered bar-clip attachment. Group (II): Received two IOD with cantilevered bar with ball attachment. Patients were recalled at 3, 6, 9 & 12 months to evaluate marginal bone loss as well as patient’s satisfaction. Results: The mean marginal bone height loss after 3 month for Group- I (Bar & clip attachment) was 0.3889mm ± 0.3915 while for Group II (Bar -ball & socket attachment) was 0.3954mm ± 0.06046. After 6 month, the mean bone loss for Group (I) was 0.6786mm ± 0.06098, while for Group (II) was 0.7056mm ± 0.4157. After 9 month, the mean bone loss for Group (I) was 0.7897mm ± 0.01378 while for Group (II) was 0.7984mm ± 0.02584. After 12 month, the mean bone loss for Group (I) was 0.8556mm ± 0.33802 while for Group (II) was 1.0154mm ± 0.08415. Regarding patient satisfaction: there was a significant difference during the follow-up intervals in both groups. Conclusions: • Bar/clip attachment may provide better stress distribution &less marginal bone loss than bar/ball attachment. • Patients may be more satisfied with bar/ball attachment than bar/clip attachment. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Implant overdenture; Bar/clip; Bar/ball; bone loss; patient satisfaction | ||||
Statistics Article View: 193 PDF Download: 111 |
||||