Field Trials on Land Gastropods Infesting some Ornamental Plants at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate | ||||
Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology | ||||
Article 2, Volume 10, Issue 1, January 2019, Page 7-11 PDF (607.63 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/jppp.2019.40553 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Author | ||||
Wafaa A. Shahawy | ||||
Harmful Animals Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Land molluscs became one of the most serious pests attacking many plants including ornamental plants. Occurrence of certain land gastropods associated with some ornamental plants at Kafr EL-Sheikh Governorate was conducted. Results revealed that the land snails, Eobania vermiculata and Succinea putris and the land slug Deroceras reticulatum were recorded on the tested plants. E vermiculata was the predominant species while the other identified gastropods showed lower infestation levels. Therefore ,the seasonal abundance of the predominant snail, E vermiculata was studied and results showed that the population of E vermiculata was increased during spring months (171.99 snails/ 1/2 m2) as compared to summer and autumn(149,34 and 59,33),respectively whereas the infestation was the least during winter (40.67 snails/ 1/2 m2). Malabar was superior among the tested plants since it attracted the highest number of snails with mean of (5.68 ± 1.56) snails/ 1/2 m2 followed by Hlibiscus, basil, kockia, DustyMiller, Manitoka and Royal palm, respectively. Both of Pricharida and Duranta were the least attractive to snails. Concerning the efficacy of certain pesticides against E vermiculata under field conditions, Data revealed that Agrinate was more toxic to snails than the other pesticides, since it achieved the highest reduction percentage of snail population of (69.03 ± 7.2 ) % followed by Vicarb with reduction of (55.87 ± 6.8)% while Uphold was the least in this respect with reduction percentage of (25.41±2.6)%. | ||||
Statistics Article View: 261 PDF Download: 643 |
||||