The validity and reliability of CT scan based tibial plateau mapping for tibial plateau fractures | ||||
| The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal | ||||
| Volume 59, Issue 3, September 2024, Page 266-273 PDF (159.45 K) | ||||
| DOI: 10.4103/eoj.eoj_43_24 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Radwan G. Metwaly; Hossam Saeed Diab; Mohamed Nader Niaz | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Introduction The Schatzker and computed tomography (CT)-based three-column classifications are the most used for tibial plateau fractures. The newer “10-segment classification” suggested to have better fracture identification and more accurate planning. This study aimed to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this new classification and to clarify its validity in clinical practice. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis of 30 patients with tibial plateau fractures who were admitted to a university hospital through the period between January 2020 and December 2022 was done. Patients with complete preoperative imaging, including radiographs, CT scans with three-dimensional reconstruction, and postoperative radiographs were included. Missing imaging, open fractures, pathological fractures, conservative management, or definitive fixation by circular external fixator were excluded. Data were reviewed independently by three expert trauma surgeons twice with 2-week intervals with randomization of case sequencing to evaluate their interobserver and intraobserver reliability for the Schatzker, CT-based three-column, and the new 10-segment classifications. The validity of the 10-segment classification was assessed by the agreement on the approach and implant position suggested by the observers. Results Good interobserver and intraobserver reliability was found as regards the Schatzker and CT-based three-column classifications on both intervals. Moderate and poor interobserver reliability “on both intervals respectively” and poor intraobserver reliability was found for the 10-segment classification. As regards the agreement on surgical approach on both time intervals, moderate and good interobserver agreements were found. For the implant position, poor interobserver agreement on both intervals was found. Intraobserver agreement for the surgical approach was good, while the intraobserver agreement for the implant position was moderate. Conclusion The Schatzker and CT-based three-column classifications are still more reliable than the newer 10-segment classification. This may be explained as it is still not familiar to surgeons and needs more training to be applied in clinical practice. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Tibial plateau fracture; Reliability; Validity; classification; Three-dimensional computed tomography | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 50 PDF Download: 13 |
||||
