Superior versus anterior plating of midshaft clavicle fractures: 6 months follow up (union rates, risks, and complications: hardware irritation and need for removal) | ||||
| The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal | ||||
| Volume 59, Issue 3, September 2024, Page 274-278 PDF (811.07 K) | ||||
| DOI: 10.4103/eoj.eoj_50_23 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Ahmed M.H. El-Safty; Hesham Mesbah; Begad Hesham; Mohamed Refaat | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background Operative management of midshaft clavicle fractures is gaining popularity. The clavicle is a tubular bone with a flat lateral end. Open reduction and internal fixation could be achieved by the application of plates and screws either to the superior or anterior surface of the clavicle. However, there is no consensus in the literature to support one technique over the other. This study aims to compare the early functional and radiographic outcomes of anterior versus superior plating for the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. Patients and methods From March 2021 to November 2022, a prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted at our institute. We included all patients with isolated midshaft clavicle fractures. Thirty-six patients were randomized by the closed envelope technique, 18 were managed with superior plating (superior group), and the other 18 patients were managed using anterior plating (anterior group). All patients were followed up for 6 months. All patients were assessed clinically for union, range of motion, and functional scores. The secondary outcome measures included operative time, complications, hardware irritation, and the need for hardware removal or secondary procedure. Results The mean time to full union was 11.28 weeks in the anterior group and 11.72 weeks in the superior group. Mean constant shoulder score for the anterior group was 84.11 while for the superior group it was 82.67. No patients had skin and wound complications in the anterior group versus one patient in the superior group that got superficial infection successfully managed by repeated dressing and antibiotics. There was no statistically significant difference between superior and anterior plating regarding union, functional scores, return to ADLs, hardware problems, or complications. Conclusion Both superior and anterior plating of the clavicle fractures are safe treatment options for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, and they lead to similar functional outcomes, functional scores, and complication rates. Moreover, the selection of the technique of plating depends on surgeon preferences. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| anterior plating and superior plating; clavicle fractures; hardware irritation | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 40 PDF Download: 43 |
||||
