Floristic Composition and Edaphic Influences in the Gulf of Suez, Red Sea Coastal Desert: A Comparative Study of Inland and Coastal Areas
Hassanen, S., Gamal Eldin, E., Kamel, W., Zaghloul, M., Hassan, Y. (2024). Floristic Composition and Edaphic Influences in the Gulf of Suez, Red Sea Coastal Desert: A Comparative Study of Inland and Coastal Areas. EKB Journal Management System, 44(1), 94-130. doi: 10.21608/taec.2025.349920.1058
Sara Hassanen; Elsayeda Gamal Eldin; Wafaa Kamel; Mohamed Saad Zaghloul; Yasmin M. Hassan. "Floristic Composition and Edaphic Influences in the Gulf of Suez, Red Sea Coastal Desert: A Comparative Study of Inland and Coastal Areas". EKB Journal Management System, 44, 1, 2024, 94-130. doi: 10.21608/taec.2025.349920.1058
Hassanen, S., Gamal Eldin, E., Kamel, W., Zaghloul, M., Hassan, Y. (2024). 'Floristic Composition and Edaphic Influences in the Gulf of Suez, Red Sea Coastal Desert: A Comparative Study of Inland and Coastal Areas', EKB Journal Management System, 44(1), pp. 94-130. doi: 10.21608/taec.2025.349920.1058
Hassanen, S., Gamal Eldin, E., Kamel, W., Zaghloul, M., Hassan, Y. Floristic Composition and Edaphic Influences in the Gulf of Suez, Red Sea Coastal Desert: A Comparative Study of Inland and Coastal Areas. EKB Journal Management System, 2024; 44(1): 94-130. doi: 10.21608/taec.2025.349920.1058

Floristic Composition and Edaphic Influences in the Gulf of Suez, Red Sea Coastal Desert: A Comparative Study of Inland and Coastal Areas

Taeckholmia
Article 5, Volume 44, Issue 1, June 2024, Page 94-130  XML PDF (960.61 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/taec.2025.349920.1058
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Sara Hassanen1; Elsayeda Gamal Eldin1; Wafaa Kamel2; Mohamed Saad Zaghloul3; Yasmin M. Hassan email orcid 2
1Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia
2Botany & Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia-Egypt.
3Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia.
Abstract
This study provides a comparative analysis of plant species composition and distribution between the inland and coastline areas of the Gulf of Suez, Red Sea coastal desert, aiming to enhance understanding of desert plant communities and their relationship with edaphic factors. The study identified 119 plant taxa from 32 families, with the Asteraceae family being the most species-rich, representing 16.8% (20 species), followed by Amaranthaceae (13.4%, 16 species), and Fabaceae, Poaceae, Zygophyllaceae, and Brassicaceae (7.5% each). Coastal areas supported 93 species, while inland areas hosted 73 species. The life form spectrum in the Red Sea coastal desert showed dominance of Chamaephytes (39.50%) and Therophytes (37.82%) with Phanerophytes (12.61%), Hemicryptophytes (6.72%), Cryptophytes (3.36%) and Parasites (0.84%). Inland areas had a higher proportion of Chamaephytes (46.58%) and Phanerophytes (15.07%), while the coastline had a more balanced distribution, with both Chamaephytes and Therophytes each making up 37.63%. In terms of plant assemblages, coastal regions exhibited seven distinct groupings, such as the Haloxylon salicornicum and Tamarix nilotica assemblages, while inland regions had five, including assemblages dominated by Zilla spinosa, Launaea spinosa, and Farsetia aegyptia. TWINSPAN analysis revealed significant ecological differences between the two regions. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) indicated that coastal species were primarily influenced by high salinity and ion concentrations, while inland species were more affected by factors like potassium, pH, and calcium carbonate. This study underscores the critical role of understanding these environmental gradients for sustainable management and conservation of Egypt’s desert ecosystems.
Keywords
CCA; Conservations; Diversity; TWINSPAN; Vegetation
Statistics
Article View: 91
PDF Download: 63