EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF RESISTANCE TO ENAMEL DEMINERALIZATION OF A LOW-SHRINKAGE SURFACE PRE-REACTED GLASS FILLED RESTORATIVE MATERIAL VERSUS CONVENTIONAL RESIN COMPOSITE: AN IN VITRO STUDY | ||||
Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
Volume 71, Issue 3 - Serial Number 4, July 2025, Page 2501-2509 PDF (1.91 MB) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2025.390479.3501 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Ehab Ahmed Fouda ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||||
1Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Egyptian Russian University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
2Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Aim of the study: To evaluate the efficacy of Beautifil-II LS giomer restorative material to inhibit enamel demineralization, as compared to conventional resin composite and glass ionomer restorative materials. Materials and methods: Nine premolar teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=3): group A (Beautifil-II LS), group B (3M Filtek Z-250), and group C (GI FX-Ultra), Nine premolar teeth were restored with each material, subjected to pH-cycling, and analyzed via environmental scanning electron microscope coupled with energy dispersive X-ray (ESEM-EDX) analysis. The calcium to phosphate ratio (Ca/P) of the enamel surface was calculated according to the atom% of elements in EDX analysis in each stage. Results: According to the Ca/P recovery ratio, group A (Beautifil-II LS) showed higher results as compared to other tested restorative materials. Conclusion: Beautifil-II LS might represent a promising restorative material to decrease the incidence of recurrent caries around existing restorations. Keywords: Giomer, Glass ionomer, Resin composite, Enamel demineralization, Secondary caries, Fluoride, Remineralization. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Giomer; Glass ionomer; Enamel demineralization; Secondary caries; Fluoride | ||||
Statistics Article View: 61 PDF Download: 35 |
||||