Exploring Lexical Hedges in George Bernard Shaw’s Pygmalion: A Pragmalinguistic Perspective

Amine, W.F.A.A. (2019). A gender-based study of hedging in selected TV interviews in Arabic: A new approach to hedging. CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of English Education, 66(2), 623-647.

Burton, R. (1916). Bernard Shaw: The man and the mask. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

Çakirtaş, Ö., & Şekerci, Ö. (2015). Bernard Shaw and politics. International Journal of Language Academy, 3(9), 340-348.

Florea, S. (2017). Pushed to the hedge: hedging devices in Romanian online media discourse on migration and refugees. Jesikoslovlie, 18(2), 181-195.

Fraser, B. (2010). Pragmatic competence: the case of hedging. In G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch, & S. Schneider (Eds.), New approaches to hedging (pp. 15-34). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Gomaa, Y.A. (2019). A corpus-based pragmatic analysis of hedging in linguistic master theses abstracts written by Pakistani students. Hermes. 8(1), 9-31.

Griffith, G. (2003). Socialism and superior brains: The political thought of George Bernard Shaw. New York: Routledge.

Hassan, A. S., & Said, N. K. M. (2020). A pragmatic study of hedges in American political editorials. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(3), 60-74. http://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v10i03.007

Hassan, J. S. (2024). Hedging in selected modern drama: A pragmatic Study. Journal of University of Garmian, 10(4), 228-241. https://doi.org/10.24271/garmian.2023.10421

Henderson, A. (1911). George Bernard Shaw: His life and works, a critical biography. Cincinnati: Stewart & Kidd Company.

Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Jalilifar, A. R. (2007). Hedging as a pragmatic strategy: Variation across disciplines and cultures. Teaching English Language, 2(1), 43-69.

Jameel, A. F. (2023). A pragmatic study of hedging in academic discourse. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 13(1), 674-682. http://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v13i01.054

Jensen, J. D. (2008). Scientific uncertainty in news coverage of cancer research: Effects of hedging on scientists’ and journalists’ credibility. Human communication research, 34(3), 347-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00324.x 

Kilicoglu, H., & Bergler, S. (2008). Recognizing speculative language in biomedical research articles: a linguistically motivated perspective. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing (pp. 46–53). Sweden: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Lakoff, G. (1973). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(4), 458-508.

Liu, J. (2020). A pragmatic analysis of Hedges from the perspective of politeness principle. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(12), 1614-1619. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1012.15

Muhammad, I. R. (2025a). Speculative language in drama: A pragmatic perspective of lexical hedges in Shaw’s Arms and the Man and Man and Superman. Journal of the Faculty of Arts Suez University, 31(2), 369-433. https://doi.org/10.21608/jfask.2025.434217

Muhammad, I. R. (2025b). The pragmatics of syntactic hedging in George Bernard Shaw’s Pygmalion. Journal of the Faculty of Arts Suez University, 31(2), 320-368. https://doi.org/10.21608/jfask.2025.434213

Namsaraev, V. (1997). Hedging in Russian academic writing in sociological texts. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 64-79).

Salager-Meyer, F. (1997). I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse. In T. Miller (Ed.), Functional approaches to written texts: Classroom applications (pp. 127–143). Washington DC: United States Information Agency.

Shaw, G. B. (1931). Immaturity. London: Constable and Company Ltd.

Shaw, G. B. (1977). Pygmalion. In S. Weintraub (Ed.), The portable Bernard Shaw. Penguin Books.

Suleiman, A. (2010). George Bernard Shaw. Baghdad: Mena for Printing & Publishing.

Taweel, A.Q., Al-Saidat, E. M., Rafayah, H.A., & Saidat, A.M. (2011). Hedging in political discourse. The Linguistics Journal, 5, 169-196.

Varttala, T. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience (Published PhD Thesis). University of Tampere, Finland.

Vlachos, A., & Craven, M. (2010). Detecting speculative language using syntactic dependencies and logistic regression. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning – Shared Task (pp. 18–25). Sweden: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Vlasyan, G. R., Pastukhova, O. D., & Shusharina, V. A. (2018). Hedging as a mitigation mechanism in political interview. In I. V. Denisova (Ed.), Word, Utterance, Text: Cognitive, Pragmatic and Cultural Aspects: Vol. 39. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 745-753). UK: Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.04.02.107

Weintraub, S. (Ed.). (1977). The portable Bernard Shaw. New York: Penguin Books.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.