A Note on Predicting Rate of Penetration Using Machine Learning Models | ||
| JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||
| Article 12, Volume 54, Issue 2, March and April 2026, Pages 13-38 PDF (2.31 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.397652.1574 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Ahmad Atef Husseiny* 1; Attia Mahmoud Attia2; Ahmed Gomaa Hagag1 | ||
| 1Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, Suez University, Suez 11252, Egypt | ||
| 2Dean department of Petroleum and Gas Technology Engineering, The British University in Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Rate of Penetration (ROP) is a critical parameter influencing drilling efficiency and accelerating field development. Although conventional ROP models (e.g., Bourgoyne, Hareland) provided reasonable results, they often struggle with limited accuracy and adaptability across different well conditions. Recent advances in hybrid machine learning (ML)-physics or deep ML models improve ROP prediction; however, these methods typically require complex programming, limiting their practical adoption. This study addresses these gaps by introducing a prompt, simple, and strong ROP prediction for directional wells, eliminating the need for hybrid modeling through the platform Dataiku Data Science Studio (DSS). To evaluate the impact of domain-specific parameters, two calculated metrics, D-exponent and Mechanical Specific Energy (MSE) were integrated into the dataset. Three ML algorithms (Gradient Boosted Trees, XGBoost, and Support Vector Machines (SVM)) were trained and tested using R², Mean Absolute Error, and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) across three directional offshore wells from the same field. XGBoost showed best performance and significant improvement R² scores for all wells after incorporating MSE and D-exponent: from 0.373 to 0.974 (Well-1), 0.216 to 0.945 (Well-2), and 0.862 to 0.983 (Well-3). Features importance and SHAP values analyses further quantified the contributions of MSE and D-exponent to all models’ accuracy, demonstrating their role in enhancing predictions. This work provides a practical, programming-free solution for ROP optimization in directional drilling, achieving high performance without using advanced ML technologies. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Rate of penetration; Machine learning; Directional Drilling; Dataiku DSS; ROP prediction optimization | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] Abdulmalek A. S., Elkatatny, S., Abdulraheem, A. Mohammed M., Abdelwahab Z.A. and Mohamed I.M. “Prediction of Rate of Penetration of Deep and Tight Formation Using Support Vector Machine.” Paper SPE-192316-MS, 2018.
[2] Akgun F. “How to Estimate the Maximum Achievable Drilling Rate without Jeopardizing Safety.” Paper SPE 78567 presented at Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 13-16 October, 2002.
[3] Benzminabadi S.N, Ahmad R., Seyed M.E.J. Behzad T., and Abbas R. “Effect of rock properties on ROP modeling using statistical and intelligent methods: a case study of an oil well in southwest of Iran.” PAN Journals. DOI 10.1515/amsc-2017-0010, 2017.
[4] Bingham, M.G., “A New Approach to Interpreting Rock Drillability.” The Petroleum Publishing Co., 1969.
[5] Bourgoyne A.T., Millheim K.K., Chenevert M.E., and Young F.S. “Applied Drilling Engineering.” Society of Petroleum Engineers Text Book Series, Vol. 1, Richardson, TX. 1986.
[6] Bourgoyne, A.T. and Young, F.S. “A Multiple Regression Approach to Optimal Drilling and Abnormal Pressure Detection.” Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal. 14 (4): 371–384., 1974.
[7] Cunningham, R.A. “Analytical Determination of Optimum Bit Weight and Rotary Speed Combinations.” Presented at the Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Dallas, Texas, 1960.
[8] Ehsan B., Ebrahim B.D., and Kasra K. “Prediction of penetration rate in drilling operations: a comparative study of three neural network forecast methods”. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. DOI: 10.1007/s13202-020-01066-1, 2021.
[9] El-Sayed Y., Salem A.S., and El-Rammah S. “Rate of Penetration Prediction in Drilling Operation in Oil and Gas Wells by K-nearest Neighbors and Multi-layer Perceptron Algorithms.” Journal of Mining and Environment (JME), Vol. 14, No. 3, 2023, 755-770. DOI:10.22044/jme.2023.12694.2306, 2023.
[10] Hareland, G. and Rampersad, P.R. “Drilling Optimization Using Drilling Data and Available Technology.” Presented at the SPE Latin America/Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina. pp. 657–667. https://doi.org/10.2118/26957-ms, 1994.
[11] Hazbeh, O., Aghdam, S.K. ye, Ghorbani, H., Mohamadian, N., Ahmadi Alvar, M., and Moghadasi, J. “Comparison of accuracy and computational performance between the machine learning algorithms for Rate of Penetration in directional drilling well.” Petroleum Research. 6 (3): 271–282. Research DOI.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.02.004, 2021.
[12] Hegde, C., Pyrcz, M., Millwater, H. Daigle H., and Gray K. “Fully Coupled End-to-End Drilling Optimization Model Using Machine Learning.” J Pet Sci Eng 186 (March): 106681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106681. 2020.
[13] Jahanbakhshi, R.K.R., “Real-time prediction of Rate of Penetration during drilling operation in oil and gas wells. Am.” Rock Mech. Assoc. 53, 127. ARMA 12-244, 2012.
[14] Kloucha C.K., El-Yossef B.S. Al-Hamlawi I., Salim M., Pausin W. Pal A., Mustapha H. Shah S., and Hussein A.N. “Machine Learning Model for Drilling Equipment Recommender System forImproved Decision Making and Optimum Performance.” Paper SPE-211731-MS, DOI 10.2118/211731-MS, 2022.
[15] Noshi C. I. and Schubert, J. J. “Application of Data Science and Machine Learning Algorithms for ROP Prediction: Turning Data into Knowledge.” Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, and 6–9 May. OTC-29288-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/29288-MS, 2019.
[16] Shaygan K., and Jamshidi S. “Prediction of Rate of Penetration in directional drilling using data mining techniques.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 221, 2023. 111293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111293
[17] Shi X., Liu, G., Gong, X., Zhang, J., Wang J., and Zhang H., “An efficient approach for real-time prediction of Rate of Penetration in offshore drilling.” Math. Probl Eng. 13, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3575380
[18] Majidi R. Albertin M., and Last N. “Pore-Pressure Estimation by Use of Mechanical Specific Energy and Drilling Efficiency.” Paper SPE 178842 Drilling & Completion, June 2017.
[19] Maurer W.C. “The perfect-cleaning theory of rotary drilling.” J. Petrol. Technol. 14 (11), 1270–1274, 1962. https://doi.org/10.2118/408-pa.
[20] Moran D., Ibrahim H., Purwanto, A., and Osmond, J. “Sophisticated ROP prediction technologies based on neural network delivers accurate drill time results.” Proc, IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drill. Technol. Conf. Exhib. Held Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnamm, 1–3 November, 100–108, 2010.
[21] Olukoga T.A. and Feng Y. “Practical Machine-Learning Applications in Well-Drilling Operations.” Paper SPE-205480-PA Drilling & Completion, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2118/205480-PA
[22] Lenwoue A., Li Z., Tang C., Zhang W., Ding S., Hu P., and Sun W. “Recent Advances and Challenges of the Application of Artificial Intelligence to Predict Wellbore Instabilities during Drilling Operations.” Paper SPE 215830-PA., 2023.
[23] Li C. and Cheng C. “Prediction and Optimization of Rate of Penetration using a Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Method based on an Improved Genetic Algorithm and Artificial Neural Network.” Paper SPE-203229-MS presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference to be held in Abu Dhabi, 2020.
[24] Li Y. and Samuel, R. “Prediction of Penetration Rate Ahead of the Bit through Real-Time Updated Machine Learning Models.” Paper presented at the SPE/IADC International Drilling Conference and Exhibition, The Hague, The Netherlands, 5–7 March. SPE-194105-MS, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2118/194105-MS.
[25] Speer, J.W. “A Method for Determining Optimum Drilling Techniques.” Paper SPE-1242-G presented at the Gulf Coast Drilling and Production Meeting, Lafayette, Louisiana, 1959.
[26] Mohamadian, N., Ghorbani, H., Wood D.A. Merhad M., Davoodi S., Rashidi S., Soleimanian A., and Shahvad A.K. “A Geomechanical Approach to Casing Collapse Prediction in Oil and Gas Wells Aided by Machine Learning.” J Pet Sci Eng 196 (107811), 2021. 107811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107811.
[27] Siddique, N., and Adeli, H., “Computational Intelligence: Synergies of Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks and Evolutionary Computing. Wiley, 2013.
[28] Omogbolahan S. A, Ahmed A. A., and Ariffin S. “Computational intelligence-based prediction of drilling Rate of Penetration: A comparative study.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2019. 172. 1-12. DOI.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.027
[29] Jorden, J. R. and Shirley, O.J. “Application of Drilling Performance Data to ovepressure Detection.” J. Pet Technol 18 (11): 1387-1394. SPE-1407-PA., 1966. DOI.org/10.2118/1407-PA
[30] Teale R. “The Concept of Specific Energy in Rock Drilling.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci. 2 (1): 57–73, 1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(65)90022-7.
[31] Warren, T. M. “Penetration Rate Performance of Roller Cone Bits.” Paper SPE-13259-PA., 1987. DOI: 10.2118/13259-PA.
[32] Detournay, E., & Defourny, P. “A phenomenological model for the drilling action of drag bits.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. 1992. DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(92)91041-3.
[33] Pessier & Fear “Quantifying Common Drilling Problems With Mechanical Specific Energy and a Bit-Specific Coefficient of Sliding Friction.” Paper SPE-24584-MS. presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Washington, D.C., 1992. https://doi.org/10.2118/24584-MS.
[34] Dataiku. “In-memory Python”. 2025. Retrieved from In-memory Python — Dataiku DSS 14 documentation.
[35] Dataiku. “Settings: Train/Test set.” 2025. Retrieved from Prediction settings — Dataiku DSS 14 documentation.
[36] Sarjana K., Hayati L., and Wahidaturrahmi W. “Mathematical modelling and verbal abilities: How they determine students’ ability to solve mathematical word problems?” Beta Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 2021. 13(2):117-129. DOI:10.20414/betajtm.v13i2.390.
[37] Ramy F., El Kammar M., Dahroug A., & Abd-Elfattah N. “AVO class II advanced prospectively workflow for deep Miocene in west delta deep marine, offshore Nile Delta, Egypt.” Journal of African Earth Sciences. Vol. 227, 2025. 105634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2025.105634
[38] Naser M.Z. “Machine learning for all! Benchmarking automated, explainable, and coding-free platforms on civil and environmental engineering problems.” Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iintel.2023.100028.
[39] Ganaie M.A., Hu M., Malik A.K., Tanveer M., and Suganthan P.N. “Ensemble deep learning: A review.” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 115, 2022. 105151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105151.
[40] Huang, F., Ash, J., Langford, J., Schapire, R., “Learning deep resnet blocks sequentially using boosting theory.” International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, pp. 2058–2067, 2018.
[41] Tabik, S., Alvear-Sandoval, R.F., Ruiz, M.M., Sancho-Gómez, J.-L., Figueiras-Vidal, A.R., Herrera, F., “MNISTNET10: A heterogeneous deep networks fusion based on the degree of certainty to reach 0.1% error rate. Ensembles overview and proposal.” Inf. Fusion 62, 73–80, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.04.002. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 226 PDF Download: 3 |
||
