Randomized Comparative Study between Direct and Indirect Tibial Revascularization in Management of Critical Limb Ischemia | ||||
| The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine | ||||
| Article 26, Volume 76, Issue 7, July 2019, Page 4639-4642 PDF (534.76 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.45652 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Abdelaziz Ahmed Abdelhafez  ; Omar Mokhtar Elhayeg; Hany Abd Elmomen Abdel fatah
| ||||
| Department of Vascular surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: The importance of the angiosome concept in critical limb ischemia remains controversial. Aim of the study: to assess the outcomes of direct re-vascularization (angiosome-targeted tibial angioplasty alone) (DR) versus indirect re-vascularization (IR) non angiosome target, in isolated tibial lesions. Patients and Methods: thirty patients were included and presented to vascular surgery department of Al-Azhar University Hospitals with infra-popliteal arterial lesions, randomly distributed into two equal groups;15 patients was treated with (DR) while 15 patients treated with (IR). Results: fifteen patients reached the end point of adequate healing: (9 patients with ‘DR’ technique and 6 patients with ‘ID’ technique) and 9 patients underwent major amputations. The limb salvage after one year was 70%. Conclusion: direct re-vascularization (DR) of the tibial vessels appears to improve wound healing and limb salvage rates compared with IR, with no effect on patency, morbidity, mortality or re-intervention rates. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Diabetes mellitus; Critical Limb Ischemia; direct revascularization; indirect revascularization; angiosome | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 144 PDF Download: 349 |
||||
