دراسة ميدانية لأثر الدعم التنظيمي المدرک على الالتزام التنظيمي العاطفي: الدور الوسيط لغموض الدور في ظل توافر الدعم المدرک للمشرف وتوافق المشرف مع الآخرين في شرکات النسيج والملابس الجاهزة المصرية
عادل عطية, . (2022). دراسة ميدانية لأثر الدعم التنظيمي المدرک على الالتزام التنظيمي العاطفي: الدور الوسيط لغموض الدور في ظل توافر الدعم المدرک للمشرف وتوافق المشرف مع الآخرين في شرکات النسيج والملابس الجاهزة المصرية. EKB Journal Management System, 42(1), 3-28. doi: 10.21608/aja.2020.47407
غادة عادل عطية. "دراسة ميدانية لأثر الدعم التنظيمي المدرک على الالتزام التنظيمي العاطفي: الدور الوسيط لغموض الدور في ظل توافر الدعم المدرک للمشرف وتوافق المشرف مع الآخرين في شرکات النسيج والملابس الجاهزة المصرية". EKB Journal Management System, 42, 1, 2022, 3-28. doi: 10.21608/aja.2020.47407
عادل عطية, . (2022). 'دراسة ميدانية لأثر الدعم التنظيمي المدرک على الالتزام التنظيمي العاطفي: الدور الوسيط لغموض الدور في ظل توافر الدعم المدرک للمشرف وتوافق المشرف مع الآخرين في شرکات النسيج والملابس الجاهزة المصرية', EKB Journal Management System, 42(1), pp. 3-28. doi: 10.21608/aja.2020.47407
عادل عطية, . دراسة ميدانية لأثر الدعم التنظيمي المدرک على الالتزام التنظيمي العاطفي: الدور الوسيط لغموض الدور في ظل توافر الدعم المدرک للمشرف وتوافق المشرف مع الآخرين في شرکات النسيج والملابس الجاهزة المصرية. EKB Journal Management System, 2022; 42(1): 3-28. doi: 10.21608/aja.2020.47407

دراسة ميدانية لأثر الدعم التنظيمي المدرک على الالتزام التنظيمي العاطفي: الدور الوسيط لغموض الدور في ظل توافر الدعم المدرک للمشرف وتوافق المشرف مع الآخرين في شرکات النسيج والملابس الجاهزة المصرية

المجلة العربية للإدارة
Article 1, Volume 42, Issue 1, March 2022, Page 3-28  XML PDF (454.85 K)
Document Type: بحوث باللغة العربیة
DOI: 10.21608/aja.2020.47407
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
غادة عادل عطية
مدرس بقسم إدارة الأعمال، کلية التجارة، جامعة الاسکندرية، جمهورية مصر العربية
Abstract
يشير الدعم التنظيمي المدرک إلى مدرکات العاملين بشأن المدى الذي تقوم فيه المنظمة بتقدير مساهماتهم، کما تهتم بمصالحهم ورفاهيتهم، ومکافأة جهودهم المتزايدة في العمل. وعلى الرغم من قيام الباحثين باختبار المتغيرات المؤثرة على الدعم التنظيمي المدرک، والنتائج السلوکية المترتبة عليه، إلا أنه لا تزال هناک حاجة للتعرف على العمليات والمواقف التي يمکن أن يؤثر فيها الدعم التنظيمي على سلوک العاملين. واعتمادًا على نظريتي التبادل الاجتماعي والدعم التنظيمي، قامت الدراسة الحالية باختبار العلاقة بين الدعم التنظيمي المدرک وبين الالتزام العاطفي من خلال غموض الدور (کوسيط)، کما قامت أيضًا بالتعرف على الظروف التي يمکن أن يکون فيها الدعم التنظيمي المدرک أکثر تأثيرا على سلوک العاملين، في ظل توافر الدعم المدرک للمشرف، ومدى توافق هذا المشرف مع الآخرين (کمتغيرات وسيطة تفاعلية). وباستخدام أسلوب الانحدار الوسيط، والانحدار الوسيط التفاعلي على عينة مکونة من 446 من العاملين بشرکات النسيج والملابس الجاهزة بمدينة الاسکندرية، أشارت النتائج إلى قبول فروض الدراسة. وتوصلت إلى أن غموض الدور (کأحد أنواع ضغوط العمل المعوقة) يمثل وسيطا جزئيا في العلاقة بين الدعم التنظيمي المدرک، وبين الالتزام العاطفي، حيث يؤثر الدعم التنظيمي المدرک على الالتزام العاطفي تأثيرًا إيجابيًا من خلال تقليل شعور العاملين بغموض الدور، بالإضافة إلى أن العلاقة العکسية بين الدعم التنظيمي المدرک وبين غموض الدور قد أصبحت أقوى في ظل توافر التفاعل بين الدعم التنظيمي المدرک وبين الدعم المدرک للمشرف، ومدى توافق هذا المشرف مع الآخرين.
Perceived Organizational Support (POS) exists when employees develop global beliefs concerning the extent to which the organization values their contributions, cares about their well-being and reward their increased work effort. Although there is a growing research concerning antecedents and consequences of Perceived Organizational Support, still there is a need to identify the mechanisms and conditions through which Perceived Organizational Support may affect the subordinates’ behaviors. Relying on Social Exchange and Organizational Support theories, the present study aims to investigate the relationship between Perceived Organizational Support and Affective Organizational Commitment through Role Ambighuity (as a mediator). It also seeks to identify the conditions in which Perceived Organizational Support would be more influential on the followers’ behaviors, through studying Perceived Supervisor Support, and Agreeableness (as Moderators). Using the Mediated and Moderator Regression Analyses, on a sample of 446 employees, working in the Textile and Garments Sector in Alexandria, the results confirmed the hypothesees, and showed that Role Ambighuity (as a type of Hindrance Stressors) partially mediated the relationship between Perceived Organizational Support and Affective Commitment, in which Perceived Organizational Support positively affects Affective Commitment through reducing employees’ perceptions of Role Ambiguity. In addition, the inverse relationship between Perceived Organizational Support and Role Ambiguity became stronger in condition of the interaction between Perceived Organizational Support and Perceived Supervisor Support, and Agreeableness.
Keywords
الدعم التنظيمي المدرک; غموض الدور; الالتزام التنظيمي العاطفي; الدعم المدرک للمشرف; توافق المشرف مع الآخرين Perceived Organizational support; Role Ambiguity; Affective Organizational Commitment; Percived Supervisor Support; Agreeableness
References

أبو رمان، أسعد حماد؛ الحوری، فالح عبد القادر؛ البورینی، فیصل عبد الرحمن. (2011). «العلاقة بیـن الدعم التنظیمی المدرک والالتـزام التنظیمی: دراسة میدانیة فی المستشفیات الأردنیة». تم الحصول علیها من شبکة المعلومات الدولیة فی مارس 2018 من موقع:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259784926_allaqt_byn_aldm_altnzymy_almdrk_walaltzam_altnzymy_drast_mydanyt_fy_almstshfyat_alardnyt

الشنطی، محمود عبد الرحمن. (2015). «دور الدعم التنظیمی المدرک کمتغیـر وسیط فی العلاقة بیـن العدالة التنظیمیة وسلوک المواطنة التنظیمیة (دراسة تطبیقیة على العاملیـن بوزارة الداخلیة – الشق المدنی – قطاع غزة). مجلة الجامعة الاسلامیة للدراسات الاقتصادیة والاداریة. المجلد 23 العدد الثانی: 31-59.

بازرعة، محمود صادق (1982). بحوث التسویق للتخطیط والرقابة واتخاذ القرارات التسویقیة. القاهرة: دار النهضة العربیة.

Mawdooa.com، صناعة الغزل والنسیج فی مصر. (2016). تم الحصول علیها من شبکة المعلومات الدولیة فی مارس 2018 من موقع: http://mawdoo3.com/صناعة_الغزل_والنسیج_فی_مصر 

Ratesnegyptnow.com، وزیـر قطاع الأعمال: «الغزل والنسیج» أکبـر قطاع یحقق خسائر لدینا. ولکن» (2018). تم الحصول علیها من شبکة المعلومات الدولیة فی مارس 2018 من موقع: https://ratesnegyptnow.com/2018/02/28/وزیـر-قطاع-الأعمال-الغزل-والنسیج-أکب/

Almasryalyoum، وزیـر قطاع الأعمال: الدولة حـریصة على حل مشکلات قطاع الغزل والنسیج. (2016). تم الحصول علیها من شبکة المعلومات الدولیة فی مارس 2018 من موقع: http://www.almasryalyoum.com/news/details/935144

Abramis, D. J. (1994). Work Role Ambiguity, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance: Meta-Analyses and Review. Psychological Reports, 75 (3): 1411-1433.

Addae, H. M., Parboteeah, K. P. and Velinor, N. (2008). Role stressors and organizational commitment: public sector employment in St Lucia. International Journal of Manpower, 29 (6): 567-582.

Allen, N. J., and Meyer, J. P. (1990). The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63: 1-18.

Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., and Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: The moderating influence of socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 288-297.

Arshadi, N. and Hayavi, G. (2013). The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support on Affective Commitment and Job Performance: Mediating role of OBSE. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84: 739 – 743.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6): 1173 - 1182.

Bersamin, K. K. (2006). Moderating Job Burnout: An Examination of Work Stressors and Organizational Commitment in a Public Sector Environment. A dissertation Submitted to the H. Wayne Huizenga School of Business and Entrepreneurship. Nova Southern University. In Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Business Administration.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

Boswell, W. R., Olson-Buchanan, J. B., and LePine, M. A. (2004). Relations between stress and work outcomes: The role of felt challenge, job control, and psychological strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64: 165–181.

Bowling, N., and Eschleman, K. (2010). Employee personality as a moderator of the relationships between work stressors and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15: 91-103.

Burns, K. L. (2016). Perceived Organizational Support and Perceived Supervisor Support as Antecedents of Work Engagement. A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Psychology. San José State University, In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science.

Caesens, G., Stinglhamber, F., Demoulin, S. and De Wilde, M. (2017). Perceived organizational support and employees’ well-being: the mediating role of organizational dehumanization. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26 (4). https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1319817

Campbell, N. S., Perry, S. J., Maertz, C. P., Allen, D. G., and Griffeth, R. W. (2013). All you need is resources: The effects of justice and support on burnout and turnover. Human Relations, 66: 759-782.

Cartwright, S., and Cooper, C. L. (2002). ASSET: An Organisational Stress Screening Tool—The Management Guide. Manchester, UK: RCL Ltd

Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., and Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 65–74.

Chen, Z., Powell, G. N., and Greenhaus, J. H. (2009). Work-to-family conflict, positive spillover, and boundary management: A person-organization fit approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74: 82–93.

Cole, M. S., Bruch, H. and Vogel, B. (2006). Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27: 463–484.

Colquitt, J. A., Baer, M. D., Long, D. M., and Halvorsen-Ganepola, M. D. K. (2014). Scale Indicators of Social Exchange Relationships: A Comparison of Relative Content Validity”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4): 599–618.

Eder, P., and Eisenberger, R. (2008). Perceived organizational support: Reducing the negative influence of coworker withdrawal behavior. Journal of Management, 34: 55-68.

Eisenberger, R., and Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., and Sowa, D. (1986). Does pay for performance increase or decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation2 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77:1026-1040.

Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., and Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 51-59.

Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., and Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 812-820.

Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., and Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 42-51.

Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., and Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 565-573.

Eschleman, K. J., Bowling, N. A., and LaHuis, D. (2014). The moderating effects of personality on the relationship between change in work stressors and change in counterproductive work behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 1-23.

Fornell, C and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1): 39-50.

Ghorpade, J., Lackritz, J., and Singh, G. (2011). Personality as a Moderator of the Relationship between Role Conflict, Role Ambiguity, and Burnout. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41 (6): 1275–1298.

Glazer, S. and Beerh, T. (2005). Consistency of implications of three role stressors across four countries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 467-87.

Gouldner, A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review, 25: 161-178.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Publications. Seventh Edition.

Hemingway, M. A. and Smith, C. S. (1999). Organizational climate and occupational stressors aspredictors of withdrawal behaviours and injuries in nurses. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72: 285-299.

Irving, G.P. and Coleman, D.F. (2003). The moderating effect of different forms of commitment on role ambiguity-job tension relations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20: 97-106.

Jackson, L. and Rothmann. S. (2006). “Occupational stress, organisational commitment, and ill-health of educators in the North West Province”. South African Journal of Education, 26 (1): 75–95.

John, O., and Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 102-138.

John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., and Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

Karimzade, A. and Besharat, M. A. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between personality dimensions and Stress coping styles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30: 797 – 802.

Kawai, N. and Mohr, A. (2015). The Contingent Effects of Role Ambiguity and Role Novelty on Expatriates’Work-related Outcomes. British Journal of Management, 26: 163–181.

King, R.C. and Sethi, V. (1997). The moderating effects of organizational commitment on burnout in information systems professionals. European Journal of Information Systems, 6: 86-96.

Kurtesis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A. and Adis, C. S. (2015). Perceived Organizational Support: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory. Journal of Management, 1-31.

Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L. Paoline III, E. A. and Clarke. A. (2005). The Impact of Role Stressors on Job Stress, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment among Private Prison Staff. Security Journal, 18 (4): 33-50.

Lazarus, R. S., and Folkman, S. 1984. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

McCrae, R. R., and Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.

Meyer, J. P., and Allen, N. J. (1991). A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment”. Human Resource Management Review, 1: 61-89.

Meyer, J. P., and Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the Workplace, Theory Research and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Meyer, J., Stanley, D., Herscovitch, L. and Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: a meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61: 20-52.

Nasir, N., Khan, S., and Nasir, S. (2017). Workplace Stressors and Job Performance: The Hypothesized Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction in Case of Higher Educational Sector Of Pakistan, International Journal Of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 6 (2).

Pan, S., and Yeh, Y. (2012). Impact of value congruence on work-family conflicts: The mediating role of work-related support. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 270-287.

Panaccio, A., and Vandenberghe, C. (2009). Perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and psychological well-being: A longitudinal study”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75: 224–236.

Pearsall, M. J., Ellis, A. P. J., and Stein, J. H. (2009). Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109: 18–28.

Podsakoff, N. P. LePine, J. A. and LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential Challenge Stressor–Hindrance Stressor Relationships with Job Attitudes, Turnover Intentions, Turnover, and Withdrawal Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (2): 438–454.

Rhoades, L., and Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 698-714.

Riggle, R. J., Edmondson, D. R., and Hansen, J. D. (2009). A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research. Journal of Business Research, 62: 1027-1030.

Shore, L. M., and Tetrick, L. E. (1991). A construct validity study of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 637-643.

Shore, L. M., and Shore, T. H. (1995). Perceived organizational support and organizational justice. In R. S. Cropanzano & K. M. Kacmar (Eds.), Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace: 149-164. Westport, CT: Quorum.

Tuzun, I. K., and Kalemci, R. A. (2011). Organizational and supervisory support in relation to employee turnover intentions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27 (5): 518-534.

Vakola, M., and Nikolaou, I. (2005). Attitudes towards organizational change: What is the role of employees’ stress and commitment2 Employee Relations, 27: 160-174.

Van Knippenberg, D. V and Sleebos, ED. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 571–584.

Varghese, L., and Barber, L. K. (2017). A preliminary study exploring moderating effects of role stressors on the relationship between Big Five personality traits and workplace cyberloafing. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11 (4), article 4.

Viswesvaran, C., Sanchez, J. I., and Fisher, J. (1999). The role of social support in the process of work stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54: 314–334.

Webster, J. R. Beehr, T. A. and Christiansen, N. D. (2010). Toward a better understanding of the effects of hindrance and challenge stressors on work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76: 68–77.

Yang, T., Shen, Y., Zhu, M., Liu, Y., Deng, J., Chen, Q., and See, L. (2016). Effects of Co-Worker and Supervisor Support on Job Stress and Presenteeism in an Aging Workforce: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13 (72).

Yousef, D.A. (2002), Job satisfaction as a mediator of the relationship between role stressors and organizational commitment. A study from an Arabic perspective, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17: 250-66.

Statistics
Article View: 745
PDF Download: 620