Human Brucellosis: Methods of Diagnosis and Risk Factors among Egyptian Patients admitted at Assiut Fever Hospital . | ||||
Journal of Recent Advances in Medicine | ||||
Article 1, Volume 1, Issue 1, March 2020, Page 1-13 PDF (473.76 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/jram.2019.13953.1013 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Essam A. El-Moselhy 1; Tahseen S. Soliman2; Ayman A. Abd El-Rahman3; Diaa M. El-Tiby4; Hesham H. Amin5; Bahaa M. Badr6 | ||||
1Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt. | ||||
2Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
3Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt. | ||||
4Tropical Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
5Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt. | ||||
6Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background: Human brucellosis, a common zoonotic disease, is major public health problem in many countries worldwide including Egypt. Objectives: To define brucellosis patients’ risk-factors and to assess diagnostic lab methods of brucellosis at Assiut Fever Hospital. Patients and Methods: The study recruited 98 patients with brucellosis and an equal number of controls. All participants were subjected to interview, clinical examination, and lab investigations. Results: Older age, males, rural residence, low socioeconomic status were significant risk-factors (OR=3.76, 2.04, 2.86, 2.72; respectively). Occupations had animals’ contact were significant risk-factor (OR=4.7); the most risky were butchers/slaughter workers (OR=8.0) and farmers/dairy workers (OR=3.59). Longer occupational exposure was risk-factor (OR=15.57). The main significant presenting symptoms were fever and muscloskeletal affections. The main significant signs were high temperature and hepato- and spleno-megaly. Standard agglutination test (SAT) titer 1/320 was the cut-off point for diagnosis and significantly lies in area under the ROC curve, sensitivity=96.4% and specificity=100.0%. Blood culture was positive in 58.2% of cases with no significant differences between SAT titer and blood culture positivity. ELISA IgM and IgG results were positive in 69.4% and 65.3% of the cases with no significant differences between SAT titer and IgM and IgG results. Conclusions: Human brucellosis has many preventable risk-factors; its diagnosis depends mainly on presence of risk-factors, clinically suspected, and SAT titer ≥1/320. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Keywords: Brucellosis; Clinical; Diagnosis; Risk-Factors; Sociodemographic | ||||
Statistics Article View: 604 PDF Download: 1,114 |
||||