Marginal Accuracy and Fracture Strength of Implant Supported Zirconia Copings Constructed Using CAD/CAM and MAD/MAM Techniques | ||||
| Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls | ||||
| Article 4, Volume 3, Issue 1, January 2016, Page 23-30 PDF (256.98 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2016.5066 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Ayat Montaser1; Atef Ahmed2; Mona Mandour3 | ||||
| 1Paper extracted from these title; Marginal Accuracy and Fracture Strength of Implant Supported Zirconia Copings Constructed Using CAD/CAM and MAD/MAM Techniques. | ||||
| 2Demonstrator, Crowns and Bridges Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University (Girls’ branch), Egypt. | ||||
| 3Professor, Head of, Crowns and Bridges Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University (Girls’ branch), Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal accuracy and fracture strength of single implant supported zirconia copings constructed using two different techniques; CAD/CAM and MAD/ MAM process. Materials and Methods: twenty titanium dummy implants with their respective zirconia abutments representing mandibular first premolar were embedded in epoxy resin blocks. Samples were divided into two groups according to the milling technique used for constructing zirconia copings: Group (I), (n=10): Zirconia copings milled using CAD/CAM system. Group (II), (n=10): Zirconia copings milled using MAD/MAM system. All samples were subjected to a fatigue procedure composed of 20,000 cycles of cyclic loading at 89 N. Marginal accuracy was determined using digital stereomicroscope. All specimens were loaded in a universal testing machine with the compressive load (N) applied within the long axis of the specimen to determine the fracture resisitance. Failure load was recorded for each specimen. Data were statistically analyzed. Results: CAD/CAM copings, group (I), recorded higher mean vertical marginal gap distance value (27.05 ± 5.57μm) than MAD/MAM copings, group (II), which recorded lower vertical marginal gap distance (20.72 ± 4.35μm). MAD/MAM samples, group (II), recorded higher mean failure load value (703.35 ± 44.07 N) in comparison to CAD/CAM samples, group (I), (416.06 ± 25.59 N). Conclusions: MAD/MAM samples showed superior marginal accuracy and fracture strength than CAD/CAM samples. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| CAD/CAM; MAD/MAM marginal accuracy; Fracture strength; Zirconia | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 220 PDF Download: 418 |
||||
