The Impact of Flipped Classroom Model and Learner Self-Regulation on Perceived Experience, Sense of Community and E-Learning Projects Performance | ||||
| التربية (الأزهر): مجلة علمية محکمة للبحوث التربوية والنفسية والاجتماعية) | ||||
| Article 16, Volume 34, 165جزء1, September and October 2015, Page 751-862 | ||||
| Document Type: بحوث فی مجال المناهج وطرق التدریس | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jsrep.2015.55360 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| Mohammed A. Farag | ||||
| Associate Professor of Instructional Technology Ain Shams University, Cairo-Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Abstract: The flipped or inverted classroom model is one in which the time and place for traditional lecture and homework are reversed. Traditional lecture is replaced by online videos assigned as homework. This frees up time in class to be spent with more student centered activities such as discussion based concept questions and group problem solving. While growing in popularity, research on the effectiveness of this format is mixed and inconsistent. The present study was designed to investigate the impact of the flipped classroom model on learner experience with the classroom environment, perceived sense of community and e-learning projects performance. Learner self-regulation was also investigated as a moderate variable. 97 male students, between the ages of 18-21, from the Faculty of Education Albaha University, participated in the study assigned to either a flipped classroom environment (N=51) or a traditional classroom environment (N=46). Before assignments to the conditions, learners were asked to respond to a 55-item self-regulation questionnaire. Furthermore, after the experiment, students received three measurements to assess their experience with the environments (40-item questionnaire type scale), sense of community (43-items scale) and e-learning projects performance (3 e-learning performance rubrics). Data were analyzed using Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). The analysis revealed several significant differences: 1) there was a main effect of the classroom environment on student experience with the environment, perceived sense of community and e-learning projects performance, with the flipped classroom group showing more positive experience and a highsense of community as well as better e-learning projects performance; 2) learner self-regulation was found to have a moderating effect with respect to experience in the learning environment, sense of community and e-learning projects performance. The results of the study were discussed in terms of their implications for designing better and effective classroom learning environment that promote student engagements and learning. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| flipped classroom; Self-regulation; sense of community; learner perception; E-learning; class activities | ||||
| References | ||||
|
REFERENCES Abfalter, D., Zaglia, M., & Mueller, J. (2012). Sense of virtual community: A follow up on its measurement. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 400–404.
Alvarez, B. (2011). Flipping the classroom: Homework in class, lessons at home. Retrieved from http://neapriorityschools.org/successful-students/flipping-the-classroomhomework- in-class-lessons-at-home-2
Ash, K. (2012). Educators Evaluate 'Flipped Classrooms'. Education Week, 32(2), 6-8.
Mabrouk, P. A. (2007). Active learning : models from the physical sciences / Patricia Ann Mabrouk, editor ; sponsored by the ACS Divisions of Analytical Chemistry and Chemical Education: American Chemical Society: Washington, DC.
Baker, J. W. (2000) “The ‘classroom flip’: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side,” 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, Florida, United States, April 12-15.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bates, S., & Galloway, R. (2012).The inverted classroom in a large enrolment introductory physics course: a case study. Paper presented at the Proc. HEASTEM Conf.
Berger, A. (2011). Self-regulation: Brain, cognition, and development: Washington, DC: APA.
Bergmann, J., &Sams, A. (2012).Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Alexandria, VA: International Society for Technology in Education.
Berrett, D. (2012). How flipping the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(25), 95-98.
Blanchard, A. (2007). Developing a sense of virtual community measure.CyberPsychology& Behavior, 10(6), 827–830.
Blanchard, A. (2008). Testing a model of sense of virtual community.Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2107–2123.
Bligh, D. A. (2000).What's the use of lectures? (1st ed.): San Francisco :Jossey Bass Publishers.
Boekaerts, M. &Niemivirta, M (2000). Self-regulated learning: finding a balance between learning goals and ego-protective goals. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 417-450). San Diego: Academic Press.
Buckner, J. (1988). The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion.American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(6), 771–791.
Crouch, C., Watkins, J., Fagen, A., & Mazur, E. (2007). Peer instruction: Engaging students one on- one, all at once. In Research-Based Reform of University Physics (1). Retrieved from http://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=4990&Doc D=241
Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977.
Davies, R., Dean, D., & Ball, N. (2013).Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course.Educational Technology Research & Development, 61(4), 563-580.
Dawson, S. (2006). A study of the relationship between student communication interaction and sense of community.The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 153– 162.
Defour, M. (2013). ‘Flipped classrooms’ spreading in Wisconsin.Community College Week, 25(16), 10.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., &Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533-568.
Doherty, P. B. (1998). Learner control in asynchronous learning environments.Asynchronous Learning Networks Magazine, 2(2). Retrieved January 14, 2014, from http://www.aln.org/alnweb/magazine/vol2_issue2/doherty.htm
Drouin, M. (2008). The relationship between students’ perceived sense of community and satisfaction, achievement, and retention in an online course. Quarterly Review ofDistance Education, 9(3), 267–284.
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 98(1), 198-208.
Eccles, J. S. &Wigfield, A. (2002).Motivational beliefs, values, and goals.Annual Review o f Psychology, 53, 109-132.
Educause. (2012). 7 things you should know about flipped classrooms. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7081.pdf
Elby, A. (2001). Helping physics students learn how to learn. American Journal of Physics, 69(S1), S54.doi: 10.1119/1.1377283
Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN.TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 57(6), 14-27.
Farag, M. A. (2013 April). The effect and relationship of learner interaction in electronic, traditional, and blended instructional technology course and delivery format preference on achievement, attitudes and satisfaction for Saudi students. Educational Technology: Studies & Researches, 23(2), 1-60.
Flipped classroom offers new learning path. (2011). Electronic Education Report, 18(23), 1-3.
Formica, S. P., Easley, J. L., &Spraker, M. C. (2010).Transforming common-sense beliefs into Newtonian thinking through Just-In-Time Teaching.Physical ReviewSpecial Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2).
Forster, P. (2004). Psychological sense of community in groups on the internet.Behaviour Change, 21(2), 141–146.
Freeman, T., Anderman, L., & Jensen, J. (2007).Sense of belonging in college freshmen at the classroom and campus levels.The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 203–220.
Frydenberg, M. (2012). Flipping excel. 2012 Proceedings of the information systems educators conference. EDSIG.29(1914)
Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12-17.
Gakhale, A. (1995). Collaborative learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Educations, 7(1).
Gannod, G. C. (2007). Work in progress: Using podcasting in an inverted classroom. Paper presented at Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI.
Gannod, G. C., Burge, J. E., &Helmick, M. T. (2008).Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering: Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. New York, NY: ACM.
Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students relationships to motivation and achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21–43.
Grandzol, C., &Grandzol, J. (2010). Interaction in online courses: More is not always better. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(2), 1–18.
Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2000).Student distress in a web-based distance education course.Information, Communication & Society, 3(4), 557–579.
Hickey, D. (1997).Motivation and contemporary socio-constructivist instructional perspectives.Educational Psychologist, 32(3), 175–193.
Henderson, R. W. & Cunningham, L. (1994).Creating interactive sociocultural environments for self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk& B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: issuesand educational applications (pp. 255-281). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hoyle, R.H., & Davisson, E.K. (2010).Measurement and modeling of self-regulation: Is standardization a reasonable goal? Paper presented at the National ResearchCouncil Workshop on Advancing Social Science Theory: The Importance ofCommon Metrics. Washington, DC.
Hu, W. (2011, January 11). Math that moves: Schools embrace the ipad. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/05/education/05tablets.html?pagewanted=all
Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., &Veermans, M. (2008).Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning.International Journal of EducationalResearch, 47(2), 122–135.
Järvelä, S., Volet, S., &Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive–situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 15–27.
Johnson, G. (2013). Student perceptions of the flipped classroom.(Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/44070
Jurado, M. B., &Rosselli, M. (2007). The elusive nature of executive functions: A review of our current understanding. Neuropsychology Review, 17(3), 213-233.
Kachka, P. (2012). Educator’s voice: What's all this talk about flipping? [Web log entry]. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonlearningsolutions.com/academicexecutives/ blog/ 2013/05/29/what?s-all-this-talk-about-flipping/
Kellogg, S. (2009). Developing online materials to facilitate an inverted classroom. Paper presented at Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, Tx.
King, A. (1993). From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side.College Teaching, 41(1), 30-35.
Lage, M.J., Platt, G.J. &Treglia, M. (2000) Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment.Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.
Lou, Y., Abrami, P., &d’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449–521.
Lounsbury, J., &DeNeui, D. (1996).Collegiate psychological sense of community in relation to size of college/university and extroversion.Journal of CommunityPsychology, 24(4), 381–394.
Martin, A., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal Relationships, Motivation, Engagement, and Achievement: Yields for Theory, Current Issues, and Educational Practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327–365.
McMillan, D.W., &Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
McClelland, M. M., & Cameron, C. E. (2011). Self‐Regulation in early childhood: Improving conceptual clarity and developing ecologically valid measures. ChildDevelopment Perspectives, 6(2), 136-142.
McKeachie, W. J., & Gibbs, G. (1999).McKeachie's teaching tips : strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. (10th ed.): Boston : HoughtonMifflin Co.
Miller, S. K. (2003). A Comparison of Student Outcomes Following Problem-Based Learning Instruction versus Traditional Lecture Learning in a Graduate Pharmacology Course.Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners,15(12), 550-556.
Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., O’Dowd, D. (2010) Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE Life Sci Educ. 9(4), 473-481.
Muilenburg, L., & Berge, Z. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48.
Newman, R. S. (1994). Academic help seeking: a strategy of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk& B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulationof learning and performance: issues and educational applications (pp. 283-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Novak, G. M. (2011). Just-in-time teaching.New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2011(128), 63-73.
Overmyer, J. (2013). Teacher vodcasting and flipped classroom network: A professional learning community for teachers using vodcasting in the classroom. Teacher Vodcasting and Flipped Classroom Network.Retrieved May 23, 2013 from http://flippedclassroom.org
Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a "flipped classroom" model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10), article 196.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning.In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M, Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook o f self-regulation (pp. 452-502). San Diego: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990).Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
Raver, C. C. (2012). Low income children's self-regulation in the classroom: Scientific inquiry for social change. American Psychologist, 67, 681-689.
Rozycki, W. (1999). Just in time teaching. Research & Creative Activity, 22(1), Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~rcapub/v22n1/p08.html
Sams, A. & Bergmann, J. (2013). Flip your students’ learning. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 16-20.
Schunk, D. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 85-94.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulation in education: Retrospect and prospect. In D. H. Schunk& B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self regulatedlearning: from teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 305-314). New York: The Guilford press.
Schwerdt, G., &Wuppermann, A. (2011). Is traditional teaching really all that bad? A within-student between-subject approach.Economics of Education Review, 30(2), 365-379.
Shea, P. (2006). A study of students’ sense of learning community in online environments.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 35–44.
Smith, L. A., & Smith, E. T. (2007). Using Camtasia to develop and enhance online learning: tutorial presentation. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., 22(5), 121-122.
Song, L., Singleton, E., Hill, J., &Koh, M. (2004).Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics.The Internet and HigherEducation, 7(1), 59–70.
Springen, K. (2013). Flipped.School Library Journal, 59(4), 23.
Stajkovic, A. D. &Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta-analysis: Psychological Bulletin 124(2), 240-261.
Thacker, B., Kim, E., Trefz, K., & Lea, S. (1994). Comparing problem solving performance of physics students in inquiry-based and traditional introductory physics courses.American Journal of Physics, 62(7), 627.doi: 10.1119/1.17480
Ursache, A., Blair, C., & Raver, C.C. (2012).The promotion of self-regulation as a means of enhancing school readiness and early achievement in children at risk for school failure.Child Development Perspectives, 6, 122-128.
Walter-Perez, N. and Dong, J. (2012).“Flipping the classroom: How to embed inquiry and design projects into a digital engineering lecture,” in Proceedings of the American Societyfor Engineering Education (ASEE) PSW Section Conference. San Luis Obispo, CA.
Vieno, A., Santinello, M., Pastore, M., & Perkins, D. (2007). Social support, sense of community in school, and self-efficacy as resources during early adolescence: An integrative model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39(1-2), 177–190.
Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and HigherEducation, 6(1), 77–90.
Walton, G., & Cohen, G. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82–96.
Williams, W. L., Weil, T. M., & Porter, J. C. K. (2012).The Relative Effects of Traditional Lectures and Guided Notes Lectures on University Student Test Scores.Behavior Analyst Today, 13(1), 12-16.
Woods, R. (2002). How much communication is enough in online courses? Exploring the relationship between frequency of instructor-initiated personal email and learner’s perceptions.International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 377–394.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview.Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Zimmerman, B. I. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of selfregulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1998a). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 73–86.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1998b). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: an analysis of examplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk& B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: from teaching to selfreflectivepractice (pp. 1-19). New York: The Guilford Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development.In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies, pp. 202-231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: a conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk& B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Selfregulationof learning and performance (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989a). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339.
Zimmerman, B. I. (1989b). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theory, research, and practice. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 1-26). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Zimmerman, B. J., Greenberg, D., & Weinstein, C. E. (1994). Self-regulating academic study time: a strategy approach. In D. H. Schunk& B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation o f learning and performance (pp. 181- 199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284-290. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 246 |
||||
