EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN COMPOSITE TO ENAMEL SURFACE OF PERMANENT TEETH ERODED BY TWO CARBONATED BEVERAGES (IN VITRO STUDY)
Hosni, M., Wahba, N., Kamar, A., El Meligy, O. (2019). EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN COMPOSITE TO ENAMEL SURFACE OF PERMANENT TEETH ERODED BY TWO CARBONATED BEVERAGES (IN VITRO STUDY). EKB Journal Management System, 44(2), 96-100. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57371
Mohamed G. Hosni; Nadia A. Wahba; Adel A. Kamar; Omar A. El Meligy. "EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN COMPOSITE TO ENAMEL SURFACE OF PERMANENT TEETH ERODED BY TWO CARBONATED BEVERAGES (IN VITRO STUDY)". EKB Journal Management System, 44, 2, 2019, 96-100. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57371
Hosni, M., Wahba, N., Kamar, A., El Meligy, O. (2019). 'EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN COMPOSITE TO ENAMEL SURFACE OF PERMANENT TEETH ERODED BY TWO CARBONATED BEVERAGES (IN VITRO STUDY)', EKB Journal Management System, 44(2), pp. 96-100. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57371
Hosni, M., Wahba, N., Kamar, A., El Meligy, O. EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN COMPOSITE TO ENAMEL SURFACE OF PERMANENT TEETH ERODED BY TWO CARBONATED BEVERAGES (IN VITRO STUDY). EKB Journal Management System, 2019; 44(2): 96-100. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57371

EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN COMPOSITE TO ENAMEL SURFACE OF PERMANENT TEETH ERODED BY TWO CARBONATED BEVERAGES (IN VITRO STUDY)

Alexandria Dental Journal
Article 16, Volume 44, Issue 2, August 2019, Page 96-100  XML PDF (299.28 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57371
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed G. Hosni* 1; Nadia A. Wahba2; Adel A. Kamar3; Omar A. El Meligy4
1Resident, Pediatric Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
2Professor of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
3Professor of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
4Professor of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt and Professor of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Dental hard tissue loss is one of the most challenging problems in dentistry. It is caused mainly by two factors, dental caries and erosion. OBJECTIVES: Evaluating and comparing in vitro the effect of two carbonated beverages on bonding of resin-composite material to human permanent enamel surface. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four sound human permanent teeth were prepared and divided randomly according to exposure media into two equal groups (I and II). Each group was divided into two subgroups. Subgroups Ia and IIa served as experimental subgroups. Subgroups Ib and IIb were protected from the challenge and served as control. Group I: specimens were exposed to Coca-Cola Regular, group II: specimens were exposed to Fanta Orange; 3x/ 1 minute. Between the challenges, they were stored in artificial saliva for a total of 24 hours. They were then, restored with Adper Single Bond 2/ Filtek Z350 XT nanofilled composite. All specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test. RESULTS: Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis were used to evaluate the difference between the tested groups. Composite material in eroded specimens showed lower bond strength than that in uneroded specimens with no significant difference between the two-erosive media (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Retention of composite resin to enamel surface was affected by acidic soft drinks as evidenced by lower shear bond strength.
Keywords
Carbonated beverages; resin composite; Shear bond strength; Coca-Cola Regular; Fanta Orange
References
  1. Addy M. Tooth brushing, tooth wear and dentine hypersensitivity-are they associated? Int Dent J. 2005;55: 261-7.
  2. Hooper S, West NX, Pickles MJ, Joiner A, Newcombe RG, Addy M. Investigation of erosion and abrasion on enamel and dentine: a model in situ using toothpastes of different abrasivity. J ClinPeriodontol. 2003;30:802-8.
  3. Matis BA, Cochran M, Carlson T. Longevity of glassionomer restorative materials: results of a 10-year evaluation. Quintessence Int.1996;27:373-82.
  4. Dugmore CR, Rock WP. A multifactorial analysis of factors associated with dental erosion. Br Dent J. 2004;196:283-6.
  5. Lana A, Lopez-Garcia E, Rodriguez-Artajelo F. Consumption of soft drinks and health-related quality of life in the adult population. Eur J ClinNutr.2015;69:1226-32.
  6. Shi Z, Taylor AW, Wittert G, Goldney R, Gill TK. Soft drink consumption and mental health problems among adults in Australia. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13:1073-9.
  7. Navarro R, Vicente A, Ortiz AJ, Bravo LA. The effects of two soft drinks on bond strength, bracket microleakage, and adhesive remnant on intact and sealed enamel. Eur J Orthod. 2011;3:60-5.
  8. Lussi A. Erosive tooth wear: A multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge. Monogr Oral Sci.2006;20:1-8.
  9. Seow WK, Thong KM. Erosive effects of common beverages on extracted premolar teeth. Aust Dent J.2005;50:173-8.
  10. Shellis RP, Featherstone JD, Lussi A. Understanding the chemistry of dental erosion. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:163-79.
  11. Jensdottir T, Holbrook P, Nauntofte B, Buchwald C, Bardow A. Immediate erosive potential of cola drinks and orange juices. J Dent Res. 2006;85:226-30.
  12. Cochrane NJ, Cai F, Yuan Y, Reynolds EC. Erosive potential of beverages sold in Australian schools. Aust Dent J. 2009;54:238-44.
  13. Van Eygen I, Vannet BV, Wehrbein H. Influence of a soft drink with low pH on enamel surfaces: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:372-7.
  14. Ireland AJ, McGuinness N, Sherriff M. An investigation into the ability of soft drinks to adhere to enamel. Caries Res.1995;29:470-6.
  15. Lazarchik D, Filler S. Effects of Gastroesophageal reflux on the oral cavity. Am J Med. 1997;103:107S-13S.
  16. Harley K. Tooth wear in the child and the youth. Br Dent J. 1999;186:492-6.
  17. Lussi A, Hellwig E, Ganss C, Jaeggi T. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Dental erosion. Oper Dent. 2009;34:251-62.
  18. Bartlett DW. The role of erosion in tooth wear: Aetiology, prevention and management. Int Dent J. 2005;55:277-84. 
  19. Vailati F, Vaglio G, Belser UC. Full-mouth minimally invasive adhesive rehabilitation to treat severe dental erosion: a case report. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14:83-92.
  20. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27:1-16.
  21. Abdalla AI, El Zohairy AA, Abdel Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ. Bond efficacy and interface morphology of selfetching adhesives to ground enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12:19-25.
  22. Bartlett DW. The role of erosion in tooth wear: Aetiology, prevention and management. Int Dent J. 2005;55:277-84.
  23. Sherin Jose Chockattu, Byathnal Suryakant Deepak, Anubhav Sood, Nandini T. Niranjan, Arun Jayasheel, and Mallikarjun K. Goud. Management of dental erosion induced by gastro-esophageal reflux disorder with direct composite veneering aided by a flexible splint matrix. Restor Dent Endod. 2018 Feb; 43: 13.
  24. Pontons-Melo JC, Pizzatto E, Furuse AY, Mondelli J. A conservative approach for restoring anterior guidance: a case report. J EsthetRestor Dent. 2012;24:171-82.
  25. Hatibovic S, Butler A, Sadek H. Microleakage of three sealants following conventional, bur and air-abrasion preparation of pits and fissures. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001;11:409-16.
  26. Casas-Apayco LC, Dreibi VM, Hipolito AC, Graeff MS, Rios D, Magalhaes AC, et al. Erosive cola-based drinks affect the bonding to enamel surface: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014;22:434-41.
  27. Coca-Cola Company. Carbonated soft drinks ingredients. 2014. Available at: http://www.cocacolaproductfacts.com/en/coca-cola-products/.
  28. Ferguson MM, Barker MJ. Saliva substitutes in the management of salivary gland dysfunction. Adv Drug Deliv Rev.1994;13:151-9.
  29. Margvelashvili M, Vichi A, Carrabba M, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Bond strength to unground enamel and sealing ability in pits and fissures of a new self-adhering flowable resin composite. J ClinPediatr Dent. 2013;37:397-402.
  30. Nozari A, Heidari A, Azimi E, Rafiee A. Comparison of shear-bond strength of composite restoration to intact enamel of primary incisors Using Different Conditioners and Adhesive Systems. GMJ. 2015;4:14-20.
  31. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 2nd ed. London, California, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2006.
  32. IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
  33. Dunn OJ. Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. Technometrics. 2012;6:241-52.
  34. Buzalaf MA, Hannas AR, Magalhães AC, Rios D, Honório HM, Delbem AC. pH-cycling models for in vitro evaluation of the efficacy of fluoridated dentifrices for caries control: strengths and limitations. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:316-34.
  35. Wang L, Casas-Apayco LC, Hipolito AC, Dreibi VM, Giacomini MC, Bim Junior O, et al. Effect of simulated intraoral erosion and/or abrasion effects on etch-and-rinse bonding to enamel. Am J Dent. 2014;27:29-34.
  36. Giacomini MC, Casas-Apayco LC, Machado CM, Freitas MC, Atta MT, Wang L. Influence of Erosive and Abrasive Cycling on Bonding of Different Adhesive Systems to Enamel: An In situ Study. Braz Dent J. 2016;27:548-55.
  37. Lenzi T, Hesse D, Guglielmi C, Anacleto K, Raggio DP. Shear bond strength of two adhesive materials to eroded enamel J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14:700-3.
  38. Guelmann M, Bonnini S, Primosch RE, Soderholm KJ. Microleakage and wall adaptation of conservative restorations. Am J Dent 2002;15:407-11.
  39. Ashish G. Patel. Microleakage In New Resin-Modified Glass Ioonomer Cements Using New No-Rinse Conditioners: An In vitro Study. Master degree. Pennsylvania, U.S.A.: Indiana University; 2012.
Statistics
Article View: 296
PDF Download: 607