RELATION OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ASSESSMENT OF MANDIBULAR BONE DENSITY TO DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENTS
El Saadawy, L., Fahmy, R., Matrawy, K., Zeitoun, M., Gaweesh, Y. (2019). RELATION OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ASSESSMENT OF MANDIBULAR BONE DENSITY TO DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENTS. EKB Journal Management System, 44(1), 87-92. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57591
Lobna M. El Saadawy; Rania A. Fahmy; Khaled A. Matrawy; Mohammed H. Zeitoun; Yousria S. Gaweesh. "RELATION OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ASSESSMENT OF MANDIBULAR BONE DENSITY TO DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENTS". EKB Journal Management System, 44, 1, 2019, 87-92. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57591
El Saadawy, L., Fahmy, R., Matrawy, K., Zeitoun, M., Gaweesh, Y. (2019). 'RELATION OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ASSESSMENT OF MANDIBULAR BONE DENSITY TO DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENTS', EKB Journal Management System, 44(1), pp. 87-92. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57591
El Saadawy, L., Fahmy, R., Matrawy, K., Zeitoun, M., Gaweesh, Y. RELATION OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ASSESSMENT OF MANDIBULAR BONE DENSITY TO DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENTS. EKB Journal Management System, 2019; 44(1): 87-92. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57591

RELATION OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ASSESSMENT OF MANDIBULAR BONE DENSITY TO DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENTS

Alexandria Dental Journal
Article 15, Volume 44, Issue 1, April 2019, Page 87-92  XML PDF (192.71 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57591
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Lobna M. El Saadawy* 1; Rania A. Fahmy2; Khaled A. Matrawy3; Mohammed H. Zeitoun; Yousria S. Gaweesh4
1Instructor in Oral Medicine, Oral Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
2Lecturer of Oral Medicine, Oral Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Oral Radiology.
3Assistant Professor of Diagnostic Radiology, Medical Research Institute.
4Professor of Oral Medicine, Oral Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Oral Radiology
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: One of the complications associated with diabetes mellitus is decrease in bone mineral density (BMD). Therefore, quantification of BMD for these patients before a dental implant procedure is essential. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an important tool that can be used for qualitative and quantitative bone assessment for treatment planning of dental implants. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of mandibular bone mineral density measured by CBCT and its correlation to T-score obtained by dual energy xray absorptiometry (DEXA) in relation to blood glycemic control as detected by glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in type 2 diabetic patients (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted clinically on twenty-four patients having T2DM, referred for CBCT examination as a part of implant planning. BMD was measured for each edentulous mandibular space using CBCT scan. The patients were grouped according to the level of HbA1c into 4 groups; control group, well-controlled group, moderately controlled group and poorly controlled group. Additionally, each candidate was examined radio-graphically using DEXA. Then, a statistical correlation between HbA1c values in relation to mandibular BMD values and T-score values was investigated. RESULTS: there was a statistically significant correlation between HbA1c values and BMD variables including: mandibular edentulous quad BMD and T-score values (p <0.001), and a statistically significant correlation between T-score value and Mandibular edentulous quad BMD (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis is a commonly underestimated problem in diabetes patients. Osteoporosis can be predicted using CBCT, so it’s the dentist responsibility to refer osteoporotic patients once being suspected.
Keywords
CBCT; BMD; DEXA; Type 2 Diabetes; Osteoporosis
References
  1. Herman WH. The Global Burden of Diabetes: An Overview. In: Jack SD (ed). Diabetes Mellitus in Developing Countries and Underserved Communities. USA: Springer; 2017. p 1-5.
  2. International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. 7th ed. Brussels International Diabetes Federation; 2015.
  3. Vestergaard P. Discrepancies in bone mineral density and fracture risk in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes--a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:427-44.
  4. Schwartz AV, Garnero P, Hillier TA, Sellmeyer DE, Strotmeyer ES, Feingold KR, et al. Pentosidine and increased fracture risk in older adults with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:2380-6.
  5. Marquezan M, Lau TCL, Mattos CT, Cunha ACd, Nojima LI, Sant'Anna EF, et al. Bone mineral density. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:62-6.
  6. Amam A, Rustom J. Assessment of Mandibular Alveolar Bone Density in Osteoporotic Adults in Syria. J Dent Oral Med. 2014;2:26-32.
  7. Nemtoi A, Ladunca O, Dragan E, Budacu C, Mihai C, Haba D. Quantitative and qualitative bone assessment of the posterior mandible in patients with diabetes mellitus: a cone beam computed tomography study. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2013;117:1002-8.
  8. Suomalainen A, Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E, Robinson S. Dentomaxillofacial imaging with panoramic views and cone beam CT. Insights Imaging. 2015;6:1-16.
  9. Monsour PA, Dudhia R. Implant radiography and radiology. Aust Dent J. 2008;53 (Suppl 1):S11-25.
  10. Oates TW, Dowell S, Robinson M, McMahan CA. Glycemic control and implant stabilization in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Dent Res 2009;88:367-71.
  11. Gomez-Moreno G, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, Rubio Roldan J, Guardia J, Gargallo J, Calvo-Guirado JL. Peri-implant evaluation in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a 3-year study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:1031-5.
  12. Dowell S, Oates TW, Robinson M. Implant success in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus with varying glycemic control: a pilot study. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:355-61.
  13. Barngkgei I, Al Haffar I, Khattab R. Osteoporosis prediction from the mandible using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44:263-71.
  14. Kenawy S, ElBeshlawy D, Dahaba M. Quantitative and qualitative maxillary jaw bone assessment using cone beam computed tomography of a diabetic versus a nondiabetic sample of egyptian population. IJAR. 2017;5:2113-26.
  15. Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2008;8:32.
  16. Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, Stelt P, Wismeijer D. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:e1-7.
  17. Gerlach NL, Meijer GJ, Borstlap WA, Bronkhorst EM, Bergé SJ, Maal TJJ. Accuracy of bone surface size and cortical layer thickness measurements using cone beam computerized tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:793-7.
  18. Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, Schulz E, Riggs M, Dus I, et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:416- 24.
  19. Adil C, Aydin T, Taspinar O, Kiziltan H, Eris AH, Hocaoglu IT, et al. Bone mineral density evaluation of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:179-82.
  20. Karimifar M, Pasha MAP, Salari A, Zamani A, Salesi M, Motaghi P. Evaluation of bone loss in diabetic postmenopausal women. J Res Med Sci. 2012;17:1033-8.
  21. de L, II, van der Klift M, de Laet CE, van Daele PL, Hofman A, Pols HA. Bone mineral density and fracture risk in type-2 diabetes mellitus: the Rotterdam Study. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:1713-20.
  22. Leidig-Bruckner G, Grobholz S, Bruckner T, ScheidtNave C, Nawroth P, Schneider JG. Prevalence and determinants of osteoporosis in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Endocr Disord. 2014;14:33.
  23. Bayani MA, Karkhah A, Hoseini SR, Qarouei R, Nourodini HQ, Bijani A, et al. The Relationship Between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Osteoporosis in Elderly People: a Cross-sectional Study. IBBJ. 2016;2:39-46.
  24. Majima T, Komatsu Y, Yamada T, Koike Y, Shigemoto M, Takagi C, et al. Decreased bone mineral density at the distal radius, but not at the lumbar spine or the femoral neck, in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:907-13.
  25. Ivaska KK, Heliövaara MK, Ebeling P, Bucci M, Huovinen V, Väänänen HK, et al. The effects of acute hyperinsulinemia on bone metabolism. Endocr Connect. 2015;4:155-62.
  26. Thomas D, Hards D, Rogers S, Ng K, Best J. Insulin receptor expression in bone. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:1312-20.
  27. Jiao H, Xiao E, Graves DT. Diabetes and its effect on bone and fracture healing. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2015;13:327- 35.
  28. Stolk R, Van Daele P, Pols H, Burger H, Hofman A, Birkenhäger J, et al. Hyperinsulinemia and bone mineral density in an elderly population: The Rotterdam Study. Bone. 1996;18:545-9.
  29. Jolly SJ, Hegde C, Shetty NS. Assessment of Maxillary and Mandibular Bone Density in Controlled Type II Diabetes: A Computed Tomography Study. J Oral Implantol. 2015;41:400-5
  30. Javed F, Romanos GE. Impact of diabetes mellitus and glycemic control on the osseointegration of dental implants: a systematic literature review. J Periodontol. 2009;80:1719-30.
  31. Mellado-Valero A, Ferrer Garcia JC, Herrera Ballester A, Labaig Rueda C. Effects of diabetes on the osseointegration of dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12:E38-43.
  32. Adil M, Khan RA, Kalam A, Venkata SK, Kandhare AD, Ghosh P, et al. Effect of anti-diabetic drugs on bone metabolism: evidence from preclinical and clinical studies. Pharmacological Reports. 2017.
  33. Onoyama K, Kawamata R, Kozai Y, Sakurai T, Kashima I. Comparison of mandibular trabecular structures between normal and diabetic rats: evaluation of spontaneous type 2 diabetes in a rat model. Oral radiology. 2011;27:35.
  34. Ay S, Gursoy UK, Erselcan T, Marakoglu I. Assessment of mandibular bone mineral density in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34:327- 31.
  35. Güngör E, Yildirim D, Çevik R. Evaluation of osteoporosis in jaw bones using cone beam CT and dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry. J Oral Sci. 2016;58:185-94.
  36. Guerra ENS, Almeida FT, Bezerra FV, Figueiredo PTdS, Silva MAG, Canto GDL, et al. Capability of CBCT to identify patients with low bone mineral density: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;3:20160475.
  37. Hua Y, Nackaerts O, Duyck J, Maes F, Jacobs R. Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:767-71.
  38. Ibrahim N, Parsa A, Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Aartman IH, Nambiar P. Influence of object location in different FOVs on trabecular bone microstructure measurements of human mandible: a cone beam CT study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43:20130329.
Statistics
Article View: 313
PDF Download: 802