THE USE OF ULTRA-SHORT DENTAL IMPLANTS IN ATROPHIC POSTERIOR RIDGES | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 11, Volume 43, Issue 1, April 2018, Page 62-67 PDF (379.99 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.57599 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Ahmed O. Gonna1; Ragab S. Hassan2; Magued H. Fahmy2 | ||||
| 1Masters student of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt, Dentist at Ministry of Health, Alexandria Egypt. | ||||
| 2Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria University. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| INTRODUCTION: Reduced alveolar bone in posterior arches is often a complication for regular dental implant placement, which leads to a longer, more complicated and unpredictable bone grafting procedures or nerve repositioning surgeries. OBJECTIVES: : In this clinical case series, placing 4-mm long Global D implants supporting a fixed dental prosthesis in atrophic resorbed posterior, arches were evaluated for 6 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In nineteen dental arches, 43 dental implants were placed and a screw retained Fixed dental prostheses were attached to two or three dental implants. All implants were placed in adequate amount of bone. No bone grafting procedures were implemented. A minimum torque of 25 Ncm was used to place the dental implants. RESULTS Forty-three dental implants were inserted. Three dental implants failed before loading. 17 Fixed dental prostheses were delivered. One patient didn’t show up for follow up and dropped out of the study. Forty-one implants were eligible for examination and follow up. At 6 month-post–insertion, the survival rate reached 92.7%. No patients suffered from any complications or side effects after implant surgeries. The mean change in the marginal bone loss around implant was found to be 0.22 mm with SD of 0.43 mm p < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that 4 mm trans-mucosal dental implants with roughed sand blasted large grit acid etched surfaces can be safely used to support fixed partial prosthesis in atrophic posterior ridges. Further and longer follow up is needed for these types of implants | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Bone loss; crown-implant ratio; jaw bone atrophy; Short implants | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1. Merheb J, Graham J, Coucke W, Roberts M, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, et al. Prediction of implant loss and marginal bone loss by analysis of dental panoramic radiographs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30:372-7.
2. Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(l):237-59.
3. Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Simion M. Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 l):203-15.
4. Omran MT, Miley DD, McLeod DE, Garcia MN. Retrospective assessment of survival rate for short endosseous dental implants. Implant Dent. 2015;24:185-91.
5. Annibali S, Cristalli MP, Dell'Aquila D, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Pilloni A. Short dental implants: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91:25-32.
6. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:667-76.
7. Lee SA, Lee CT, Fu MM, Elmisalati W, Chuang SK. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of limited vertical height in the posterior region: short implants (5 to 8 mm) vs longer implants (> 8 mm) in vertically augmented sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:1085-97.
8. Srinivasan M, Vazquez L, Rieder P, Moraguez O, Bernard JP, Belser UC. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:539-45.
9. Mezzomo LA, Miller R, Triches D, Alonso F, Shinkai RS. Meta-analysis of single crowns supported by short (<10 mm) implants in the posterior region. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41:191-213.
10.Anitua E, Orive G. Short implants in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective study with 1 to 8 years of follow-up. J Periodontol. 2010;81:819-26.
11.Demiralp KO, Akbulut N, Kursun S, Argun D, Bagis N, Orhan K. Survival rate of short, locking taper implants with a plateau design: a 5-year retrospective study. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:197451.
12.Penarrocha-Oltra D, Aloy-Prosper A, Cervera-Ballester J, Penarrocha-Diago M, Canullo L, Penarrocha-Diago M. Implant treatment in atrophic posterior mandibles: vertical regeneration with block bone grafts versus implants with 5.5-mm intrabony length. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:659-66.
13.Sun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, Shi B. Failure rates of short (</= 10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing
their failure: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:816-25.
14.Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:856-63. 15.Slotte C, Gronningsaeter A, Halmoy AM, Ohrnell LO, Mordenfeld A, Isaksson S, et al. Four-Millimeter-Long Posterior-Mandible Implants: 5-Year Outcomes of a Prospective Multicenter Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(2):e385-95.
16.Pistilli R, Barausse C, Checchi L, Felice P. Rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior mandible with short (4-mm) implants: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34:713-8.
17.Kotz S BN, Read CB, Vidakovic B. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. 2nd ed. Hoboken, N.J.: WileyInterscience; 2006.
18.Kirkpatrick LA FB. A simple guide to IBM SPSS statistics for version 20.0. Student ed. Belmont, Calif.:Wadsworth, Cengage Learning; 2013.
19.Slotte C, Gronningsaeter A, Halmoy AM, Ohrnell LO, Stroh G, Isaksson S, et al. Four-millimeter implants supporting fixed partial dental prostheses in the severely resorbed posterior mandible: two-year results. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;(14 Suppl 1):e46-58.
20.Esposito M, Barausse C, Pistilli R, Checchi V, Diazzi M, Gatto MR, et al. Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: Four-month post-loading data from arandomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol.2015;8:221-30.
21.Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res.2006;17(2):35-51.
22.Misch CE. Short dental implants: a literature review and rationale for use. Dentistry today. 2005;24:64-6, 8.
23.Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Early tissue response to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical bone. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1993;4:240-50.
24.Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:422-31.
25.Anitua E, Pinas L, Orive G. Retrospective study of short and extra-short implants placed in posterior regions: influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone loss. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:102-10.
26.Monje A, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Garcia-Nogales A, Fu JH, Wang HL. A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (<10 mm) for implant-supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:1119-24.
27.Draenert FG, Sagheb K, Baumgardt K, Kammerer PW. Retrospective analysis of survival rates and marginal bone loss on short implants in the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:1063-9.
28.Blanes RJ. To what extent does the crown-implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implantsupported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(Suppl 4):67-72.
29.Blanes RJ. To what extent does the crown-implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implantsupported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(4):67-72.Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:707- 14.
30.Rokni S, Todescan R, Watson P, Pharoah M, Adegbembo AO, Deporter D. An assessment of crownto-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:69-76.
31.Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int. 1985;37:411-7.
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 260 PDF Download: 466 |
||||
