TRANSCRESTAL MAXILLARY SINUS FLOOR ELEVATION USING THE BALLOON TECHNIQUE WITH SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 13, Volume 43, Issue 1, April 2018, Page 73-79 PDF (530.9 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.57601 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Ahmed M. Qassem1; Nagy P. Hassan2; Magued H. Fahmy2 | ||||
| 1Instructor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation of the maxilla using implants is frequently problematic because of the pneumatization of the maxillary sinus into the alveolar ridge. When only a few millimeters of augmentation are needed in conjunction with simultaneous implant placement, an indirect sinus lift is effective. This study describes transcrestal sinus lift using the sinus balloon technique and DASK (Dentium Advanced Sinus Kit) drills for implant placement in patients with an atrophic maxillary posterior area with synthetic bone graft, to evaluate the bone height achieved and the implant success rate. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinically and radiographically the simultaneous implant placement and grafting with synthetic bone graft after Schneiderian membrane elevation using the maxillary sinus balloon technique and DASK drills. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 13 patients with missing posterior maxillary teeth (premolars or molars) and with limited bone height below the floor of the maxillary sinus received an implant and grafting with synthetic bone graft after maxillary sinus lifting using a maxillary sinus balloon technique and DASK drills. RESULTS: Cone beam computerized tomography 6 months postoperatively showed statistically significant increase in bone height and density. The mean preoperative vertical bone height value was (5.97 ± 1.17 mm), while the mean 6 months postoperative vertical bone height value was (10.45 ± 1.56 mm). The mean preoperative implant bone density value was (349.6 ± 1265.9 HU), while the mean postoperative implant bone density was (771.1 ± 239.1 HU). CONCLUSIONS: Sinus balloon and DASK drills are an acceptable tool for indirect sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Transcrestal approach; sinus balloon technique; DASK drills; Implants | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1. Monje A, Suarez F, Garaicoa CA, Monje F, GalindoMoreno P, García-Nogales A, et al. Effect of location on primary stability and healing of dental implants. I Implant Dent. 2014;23:69-73.
2. Summers RB. Sinus floor elevation with osteotomes. J Esthet Dent. 1998;10:164-71.
3. Kfir E, Goldstein M, Rafaelov R, Yerushalmi I, Kfir V, Mazor Z, et al. Minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation in the presence of antral septa: a report of 26 procedures. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35:257-67.
4.Emmerich D, Att W, Stappert C. Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2005;76:1237-51.
5. Nkenke E, Schlegel A, Schultze-Mosgau S, Neukam FW, Wiltfang J. The endoscopically controlled osteotome sinus floor elevation: a preliminary prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17: 557-66.
6. Stelzle F, Benner KU. Evaluation of different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of 10 mm: an experimental ex vivo study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13:124-33.
7.Muronoi M, Xu H, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. Simplified procedure for augmentation of the sinus floor using a haemostatic nasal balloon. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;41:120-1.
8. Soltan M, Smiler DG. Antral membrane balloon elevation. J Oral Implantol. 2005;31(2):85-90.
9. Kfir E, Kfir V, Mijiritsky E, Rafaeloff R, Kaluski E. Minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation followed by maxillary bone augmentation and implant fixation. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32:26-33.
10.Hu X, Lin Y, Metzmacher A-R, Zhang Y. Sinus membrane lift using a water balloon followed by bone grafting and implant placement: a 28-case report. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22:243-7.
11.Orhan K, Seker BK, Aksoy S, Bayindir H, Berberoğlu A, Seker E. Cone beam CT evaluation of maxillary sinus septa prevalence, height, location and morphology in children and an adult population. Med Princ Pract. 2013;22:47-53.
12.Suneelkumar C, Datta K, Srinivasan MR, Kumar ST. Biphasic calcium phosphate in periapical surgery. J Conserv Dent. 2008;11:92-6.
13.Steflik DE, Koth DL, Robinson FG, McKinney RV, Davis BC, Morris CF, et al. Prospective investigation of the single-crystal sapphire endosteal dental implant in humans: ten-year results. J Oral Implantol. 1995;21:8-18.
14.Yokobe J, Kitahara M, Matsushima M, Uezono S. Preference for different anchor descriptors on visual analogue scales among Japanese patients with chronic pain. PLoS One. 2014;9:e99891.
15.Kotz S, Read CB, Vidakovic B. Balakrishnan N. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. 2nd ed. N.J.: WileyInterscience; 2006.
16.Younes R, Nader N, Khoury G. Sinus Grafting Techniques: A Step-by-Step Guide: Springer; 2015.
17.Clementini M, Rossetti P, Penarrocha D, Micarelli C, Bonachela W, Canullo L. Systemic risk factors for periimplant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:323-34.
18.Manfredini D, Poggio CE, Lobbezoo F. Is bruxism a risk factor for dental implants? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:460-9.
19.Torretta S, Mantovani M, Testori T, Cappadona M, Pignataro L. Importance of ENT assessment in stratifying candidates for sinus floor elevation: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:57-62.
20.Cassetta M, Sofan AA, Altieri F, Barbato E. Evaluation of alveolar cortical bone thickness and density for orthodontic mini-implant placement. J Clin Exp Dent 2013;5:e245.
21.Bornstein MM, Scarfe WC, Vaughn VM, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 (l):55-77.
22. Pedroso LAdM, Garcia RR, Leles JLR, Leles CR, Silva MAGS. Impact of cone-beam computed tomography on implant planning and on prediction of implant size. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28:46-53.
23.Chasioti E, Sayed M, Drew H. Novel techniques with the aid of a staged CBCT guided surgical protocol. Case Rep Dent. 2015;2015:439706.
24.Cho S-W, Kim S-J, Lee D-K, Kim C-S. The comparative evaluation using Hatch Reamer technique and osteotome technique in sinus floor elevation. Maxillofacial Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;32:154-61.
25. Pozzi A, Moy PK. Minimally Invasive Transcrestal Guided Sinus Lift (TGSL): A Clinical Prospective Proof-of-Concept Cohort Study up to 52 Months. C Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:582-93.
26. Wallace SS, Tarnow DP, Froum SJ, Cho S-C, Zadeh HH, Stoupel J, et al. Maxillary sinus elevation by lateral window approach: evolution of technology and technique. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12:161-71.
27. Zijderveld SA, van den Bergh JP, Schulten EA, Christiaan M. Anatomical and surgical findings and complications in 100 consecutive maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:1426-38.
28. Gabbert O, Koob A, Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P. Implants placed in combination with an internal sinus lift without graft material: an analysis of short term failure. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:177-83.
29.Brånemark P, Adell R, Albrektsson T, Lekholm U, Lindström J, Rockler B. An experimental and clinical study of osseointegrated implants penetrating the nasal cavity and maxillary sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984;42:497-505.
30.Cavicchia F, Bravi F, Petrelli G. Localized augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor through a coronal approach for the placement of implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001;21:475-85.
31.Jung J-H, Choi B-H, Zhu S-J, Lee S-H, Huh J-Y, You TM, et al. The effects of exposing dental implants to the maxillary sinus cavity on sinus complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102:602-5.
32.Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Oliver AJ. Varying treatment strategies for reconstruction of maxillary atrophy with implants: results in 98 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52:210-6.
33.Raghoebar G, Batenburg R, Timmenga N, Vissink A, Reintsema H. Morbidity and complications of bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus for the placement of endosseous implants. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1999;3:S65-9.
34. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol. 2004;75:511-6.
35. Kfir E, Goldstein M, Yerushalmi I, Rafaelov R, Mazor Z, Kfir V, et al. Minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation - results of a multicenter registry. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11(1):e83-91.
36. Lee JH, Jung UW, Kim CS, Choi SH, Cho KS. Histologic and clinical evaluation for maxillary sinus augmentation using macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate in human. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:767-71.
37. Kim Y-K, Kim S-G, Park J-Y, Yi Y-J, Bae J-H. Comparison of clinical outcomes of sinus bone graft with simultaneous implant placement: 4-month and 6-month final prosthetic loading. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111:164-9. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 308 PDF Download: 530 |
||||
