EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE POLYMERS TO ITS RESIN VENEERING AND TO DENTIN (IN VITRO STUDY) | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 11, Volume 43, Issue 2, August 2018, Page 62-68 PDF (516.01 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.57626 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Mahinour A. Yousry* 1; Sanaa A. Hussein2; Fayza H. Al Abbassy3 | ||||
| 1B.D.S 2009 | ||||
| 2Professor of fixed prosthdontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University | ||||
| 3Assistant Professor of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| INTRODUCTION: : Looking through the wide range of prosthetic options High-performance polymers properties. Needs over layering resin veneer, bonded by a special adhesive, this adds an additional challenge to achieve adequate bond strength, also its bonding to tooth structure remains difficult. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate shear bond strength of CAD/CAM High-performance polymers (BioHPP) with its CAD/CAM veneering composite using two different adhesives, as well as to dentin using two types of cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in vitro study, for Group I, twenty BioHPP discs with their CAD/CAM veneering composite, were milled and divided randomly into two subgroups (n =10) according to the adhesive system used. Subgroup IA: using DTK adhesive (dualhardening adhesive). Subgroup IB: using Combo.lign (dual-hardening adhesive). For Group II, twenty CAD/CAM High-performance polymers (BioHPP) discs were milled and divided into two subgroups according to the different cements used to lute to dentin surface. Subgroup IIA: using: RelyX Unicem resin cement, subgroup IIB: using Fuji Plus GI cement. After water storage, thermocycling (1200 cycles, 5°C/55°C) corresponding to one year of clinical service, all the specimens were subjected to shear force until failure and the results in the various groups were compared and statistically analyzed. Modes of failure were assessed. RESULTS: Mean SBS were as follows: subgroup IA (DTK adhesive 6.238), subgroup IB (combo.lign2.42), subgroup IIA (RelyX Unicem 2.07) and subgroup IIB (Fuji Plus 3.77). Mann-Whitney test demonstrated significant differences between the two subgroups in groups I and II (U= 2.0, P=.001) (U=17, P=.013) respectively. Stereomicroscope revealed that mixed and adhesive failure were the most dominant mode of failure. CONCLUSIONS MDP-Containing Self-adhesive Resin (DTK adhesive) is recommended as efficient adhesive to increase the shear bond strength of the veneering composite to BioHPP. Also Fuji Plus showed better bond strength than RelyX Unicem with BioHPP and dentin. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Polyetheretherketone; PEEK; Shear Strength; Composite resins | ||||
| References | ||||
|
REFERENCES 1. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4845-69.
2. Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hämmerle CH, Fischer J et al. Effect of different surface pretreatment and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater. 2010; 26:553-9.
3. Jurgen V, Marc S, Frank S. BioHPP - a metal-free material for prosthetic restorations. Zahntech MAG. 2013;17:138-43. 4. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, et al. Polyetheretherketone- a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses. J Biomed Mater. 2013;101:1209-16.
5. Rosentritt M, Behra M, Zel J, Feilzer A. Approach for evaluating the influence of laboratory simulation. Dent Mater. 2009;25:348-52.
6. International Organization for Standardization. Dental materials -Testing of adhesion, ISO 11405, 2003.
7. Patcharawan S, Pisaisit Ch, Kittipong T, Banjong Ch, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to PEEK. Dent Mater J. 2016;35:668-74.
8. Regina F, Villefort R, Lilian C, Tiago M, Bastos C, Renata M, et al. Bonding of the Polymer Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to human dentin: effect of surface treatments. Braz Dent J. 2016;27:693-9.
9. Ourahmoune R, Salvia M, Mathia TG, Mesrati N. Surface morphology and wettability of sandblasted PEEK and its composites. Scanning. 2014;36:64-75.
10.Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B, et al. Effect of sulfuric acid etching of polyetheretherketone on the shear bond strength to resin cements. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16:465- 72.
11.Stawarczyk B , Bahr N , Beuer F, Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Schmidlin P, et al. Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Invest. 2014;18:163-70.
12.Hossein P, Maryam R, Dastjerdi S, Vahid S, Alaleh S, Atefeh R, et al. Effect of Different Surface Treatment on Shear Bond Strength of Veneering Composite to Polyetherketone Core Material. Inter J of Adv Biotec & Research. 2016;7:1116-21.
13.Kern M, Lehmann F. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to Polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Dent Mater. 2012;28:1280-3.
14.Stawarczyk B, Eichberger M, Uhrenbacher J, Wimmer T, Edelhoff D, Schmidlin PR, et al. Three-unit reinforced polyetheretherketone composite FDPs: influence of fabrication method on load-bearing capacity and failure types. Dent Mater J. 2015;34:7-12.
15.Stawarczyk B, Bahr N, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Schmidlin PR, et al. Influence of plasma on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:163- 70.
16.Hallmann L, Mehl A, Sereno N, Hämmerle C. The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through different pretreatments. Applied Surface Science 2012;258:7213-8.
17.Heimer S, Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B. Discoloration of PMMA, composite, and PEEK. Clin.Oral Investig. 2016;21:1191-200.
18.Uhrenbacher J, Schmidlin PR, Keul C, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W, et al. The effect of surface modification on the retention strength of polyetheretherketone crowns adhesively bonded to dentin abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:1489-97.
19.Stawarczyk B, Bahr N, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Gernet W, et al. Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:163- 70.
20.Kern M, Lehmann F. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to Polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Dent Mater. 2012;28:1280-3.
21.Liebermann A, Wimmer T, Schmidlin PR, Scherer H, Loffler P, Stawarczyk B, et al. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. J. Prosthet Dent. 2016;115: 321-8.
22.Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Beuer F, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Tensile bond strength of veneering resins to PEEK: impact of different adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2013;32:441-8.
23.Hallmann L, Mehl A, Sereno N, Hammerle C. The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through different pretreatments. Appl Surf Sci. 2012;258:7213- 8.
24.Goyal RK, Tiwari AN, Negi YS. High performance polymer composites on poly ether ether ketone reinforced with Al2O3. J Appl Polym Sci.2006;100:4623–31.
25. Keul C, Liebermann A, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Sener B, Stawarczyk B, et al. Influence of PEEK surface modification on the retention of two veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent. 2013;32:441-8.
26. International organization for standardization. ISO standard 10477: dentistry-polymer-based crown and bridge materials Amendment;1996.
27. Mirza R, Baig A, Gunaseelan R, Norsiah Y. Zygomatic implant-retained fixed complete denture for an elderly patient. Gerodontology J. 2012;29:1140–5.
28. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Beuer F, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Tensile bond strength of veneering resins to PEEK: Impact of different adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2013; 32:441-8.
29. Jin-Soo A, Young A, Yoon L, Deog-G. Shear bond strength of MDP-containing self-adhesive resin cement and Y-TZP ceramics: effect of phosphate monomercontaining primers. BioMed Research Int. 2015;389234:6-12.
30. Peter T, Pontsa A. Attachment bonding technique using DTK adhesive. The Dent-Liner Summer. 2010;14:250- 5. 31. Patrick R, Schmidlin PR, Bogna St, Marco W, Thomas A, Christoph HF, et al. Effect of different surface pretreatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent mater. 2010;26:553-9.
32. Martin R, Verena P, Michael B, Nuno S, Carola K. Shear bond strength between veneering composite and PEEK after different surface modifications. Clin Oral Invest. 2015;19:739-44.
33. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Thaller C, Rudolph H, Feilzer A. Fracture performance of computer-aided manufactured zirconia and alloy crowns. Quintessence Int. 2009; 40:655-62.
34. Albert FE, El-Mowafy OM. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera All Ceram crowns with four cements. Int J Prosthet. 2004;17:529-35.
35. Camila S, Manthan P, Eric S. In vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates. Operat Dent. 2013;38:186-96.
36. Capa N, Ozkurt Z, Canpolat C, Kazazoglu E. Shear bond strength of luting agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative core materials. Aust D J. 2009; 54:334-40.
37. International Organization for Standardization. Dental materials - Testing of adhesion to tooth structure, ISO/TS11405; 2003.
38. Uhrenbacher J, Schmidlin PR, Keul C, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W, et al. The effect of surface modification on the retention strength of polyetheretherketone crowns adhesively bonded to dentin abutments. J Prosthet Dent .2014; 6:1489-97.
39. Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E, Wrbas KT. Curing efficiency of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater. 2009;25:1104-8.
40. Patrick R, Schmidlin PR, Christine K, Malgorzata R, Beatrice S, Bogna ST, et al. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16:383-92. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 398 PDF Download: 1,353 |
||||
