BIAXIAL FLEXURAL STRENGTH OF UN-SHADED AND SHADEDMONOLITHIC TRANSLUCENT ZIRCONIA | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 12, Volume 43, Issue 2, August 2018, Page 69-73 PDF (352.67 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.57627 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Maher R. Mohamed* 1; Sanaa H. Abdel Kader2; Yehia H. Aboushady2; Mona M. Abd El-latif3 | ||||
| 1Instructor of Fixed Prosthodontics, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Professor of Fixed Prosthodontics, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. | ||||
| 3Professor of Fabrication Technology Research Department, Advanced Technology and New Materials Research Institute (ATNMRI), City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, New Borg El-Arab City, Alexandria, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| INTRODUCTION: The natural white color of zirconia together with the veneer chipping problem has led to the development of tooth colored monolithic (full-anatomic) zirconia. In order to optimize esthetics shading of monolithic zirconia were done by two main approaches, either by powder mixing method or by infiltration technique. The influence of infiltration technique on mechanical properties of zirconia has been reviewed previously, while the influence of powder mixing method on the mechanical properties of shaded zirconia, specially the biaxial flexural strength has not been widely studied before. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the biaxial flexural strength and the crystal structure of shaded CAD/CAM monolithic translucent zirconia by powder mixing method with un-shaded ones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty fully sintered discs of un-shaded [T 0] and shaded [T S] monolithic translucent zirconia of diameter 12 mm and thickness 1 mm has been divided into 2 parallel groups of 10 discs each. Their biaxial flexural strength was measured using a ball-on-ring test fixture and universal testing machine at room temperature. Statistical significance was measured using One-Way ANOVA test. Then crystallographic analysis was done for both groups using X-ray diffraction. Finally the nature of failures of the tested specimens was examined using confocal laser microscopy. RESULTS: Biaxial flexural strength test showed no significant difference between un-shaded and shaded specimens. X-ray diffraction spectrum only showed crystals of tetragonal zirconia with no evidence of neither monoclinic zirconia crystals nor coloring oxides crystal phases. Confocal laser microscopy images of both groups showed the classic fracture patterns of monolithic zirconia materials. CONCLUSIONS: shading of zirconia blocks by powder mixing methods does not significantly (P≥0.05) affect either biaxial flexural strength or crystallographic structure of monolithic translucent zirconia | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| monolithic; Zirconia; Shaded; Biaxial Flexural Strength | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1. Springate SD, Winchester LJ. An evaluation of zirconium oxide brackets: a preliminary laboratory and clinical report. Br J Orthod. 1991; 18(3):203-9.
2. Nothdurft FP, Pospiech PR. Clinical evaluation of pulpless teeth restored with conventionally cemented zirconia posts: a pilot study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2006; 95(4):311-4.
3. Manicone PF, Iommetti PR, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007; 35(11):819-26.
4. Nakamura K, Kanno T, Milleding P, Örtengren U. Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010; 23(4).
5. Wenz HJ, Bartsch J, Wolfart S, Kern M. Osseointegration and clinical success of zirconia dental implants: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2008; 21(1).
6. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92(6):557-62.
7. Lüthy H, Filser F, Loeffel O, Schumacher M, Gauckler LJ, Hammerle CH. Strength and reliability of four-unit allceramic posterior bridges. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(10):930-7.
8. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(3):299-307.
9. Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, Chung KH. Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 107(3):170-7.
10. Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Gueth JF, Edelhoff D, Naumann M. In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns. Dent Mater. 2012; 28(4):449-56.
11. Johansson C, Kmet G, Rivera J, Larsson C, Vult Von Steyern P. Fracture strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns made of high translucent yttrium oxide-stabilized zirconium dioxide compared to porcelain-veneered crowns and lithium disilicate crowns. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014; 72(2):145-53.
12. Garvie RC, Hannink RH, Pascoe RT. Ceramic steel?. Nature. 1975; 258(5537):703-4.
13. Kelly PM, Ball CJ. Crystallography of Stress‐Induced Martensitic Transformations in Partially Stabilized Zirconia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1986; 69(3):259-64.
14. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999; 20(1):1-25.
15. Chevalier J, Gremillard L, Deville S. Low-temperature degradation of zirconia and implications for biomedical implants. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2007; 37:1-32.
16. Cales B. Colored zirconia ceramics for dental applications. InBIOCERAMICS-CONFERENCE.1998; 11:591-4.
17. Shah K, Holloway JA, Denry IL. Effect of coloring with various metal oxides on the microstructure, color, and flexural strength of 3Y‐TZP. J Biomed Mater Res. 2008; 87(2):329-37.
18. Hjerppe J, Närhi T, Fröberg K, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Effect of shading the zirconia framework on biaxial strength and surface microhardness. Acta Odontol Scand. 2008; 66(5):262-7.
19. Kaya G. Production and characterization of self-colored dental zirconia blocks. CERAM INT. 2013 Jan; 39(1):511-7.
20. Kuroda S, Shinya A, Yokoyama D, Harunori GO, Shinya A. Effects of coloring agents applied during sintering on bending strength and hardness of zirconia ceramics. Dent Mater J. 2013; 32(5):793-800.
21. Pittayachawan P, McDonald A, Petrie A, Knowles JC. The biaxial flexural strength and fatigue property of Lava™ YTZP dental ceramic. Dent Mater. 2007; 23(8):1018-29.
22. Spyropoulou PE, Kamposiora P, Eliades G, Papavasiliou G, Razzoog ME, Thompson JY, Smith RL, Bayne SC. Composition, phase analysis, biaxial flexural strength, and fatigue of unshaded versus shaded Procera zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116(2):269-76.
23. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999; 27(2):89-99.
24. Bhamra G, Palin WM, Fleming GJ. The effect of surface roughness on the flexure strength of an alumina reinforced all-ceramic crown material. J Dent. 2002; 30(4):153-60.
25. Timoshenko SP, Woinowsky-Krieger S. Theory of plates and shells. McGraw-hill; 1959.
26. Anusavice KJ, Dehoff PH, Fairhurst CW. Materials Science: Comparative Evaluation of Ceramic-metal Bond Tests Using Finite Element Stress Analysis. J Dent Res. 1980; 59(3):608-13.
27. Schatz C, Strickstrock M, Roos M, Edelhoff D, Eichberger M, Zylla IM, Stawarczyk B. Influence of specimen preparation and test methods on the flexural strength results of monolithic zirconia materials. Materials. 2016; 9(3):180.
28. Ebeid K, Wille S, Hamdy A, Salah T, El-Etreby A, Kern M. Effect of changes in sintering parameters on monolithic translucent zirconia. Dent Mater. 2014 Dec 31;30(12):e419-24.
29. Church TD, Jessup JP, Guillory VL, Vandewalle KS. Translucency and strength of high-translucency monolithic zirconium oxide materials. Gen Dent. 2017; 65(1):48-52.
30. Karakoca S, Yılmaz H. Influence of surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of Y‐TZP ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res. 2009; 91(2):930-37.
31. Kosmač T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater. 1999; 15(6):426-33.
32. Curtis AR, Wright AJ, Fleming GJ. The influence of surface modification techniques on the performance of a Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent. 2006; 34(3):195-206.
33. Luthardt RG, Holzhüter M, Sandkuhl O, Herold V, Schnapp JD, Kuhlisch E, Walter M. Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP-zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res. 2002; 81(7):487-91.
34. Nascente PA, de Souza DP. XPS characterisation of ceria-stabilised zirconia doped with iron oxide. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1999; 144:228-32.
35. Wen N, Yi YF, Zhang WW, Deng B, Shao LQ, Dong LM, Tian JM. The color of Fe2O3 and Bi2O3 pigmented dental zirconia ceramic. InKey Engineering Materials. Trans Tech Publications .2010; 434:582-5.
36. Quinn GD. Fractography of ceramics and glasses. Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2007.
37. Lameira DP, De Souza GM. Fracture strength of aged monolithic and bilayer zirconia-based crowns. BioMed Res. Int. 2015.
38. Nakamura K, Mouhat M, Nergård JM, Lægreid SJ, Kanno T, Milleding P, Örtengren U. Effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016; 2(1):12-9.
39. Øilo M, Kvam K, Gjerdet NR. Load at fracture of monolithic and bilayered zirconia crowns with and without a cervical zirconia collar. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115(5):630-6. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 151 PDF Download: 620 |
||||
