COMPARISON OF BITE FORCE RECOVERY FOLLOWING TREATMENT OF MANDIBULAR ANGLE FRACTURE USING ONE AND TWO MINIPLATES | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 4, Volume 42, Issue 2, December 2017, Page 147-154 PDF (899.41 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2017.57918 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Ahmed A. Abo Mustafa* 1; Moustafa M. El Dibany2; Mohamed M. Shokry3; Lydia N. Foad3 | ||||
| 1B.D.S. Faculty of Dentistry, Misr University for Science and Technology (MUST), Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| 2Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt | ||||
| 3Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| INTRODUCTION: Rigid internal fixation using compression and non-compression plating systems has gained widespread popularity. The maximal bite force is the effort exerted between the maxillary and mandibular teeth when the mandible is elevated by the masticatory muscles. OBJECTIVES: The Present study was conducted to compare the bite force recovery in patients with mandibular angle fractures treated by one monocortical miniplate and two monocortical miniplates fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bite force (in kg) was recorded in fourteen patients with mandibular angle fractures. Comparative evaluation of bite force generated was performed between seven cases treated with one monocortical miniplate and seven cases treated with two monocortical miniplates. Bite force generated by patients with mandibular angle fractures was recorded in incisor, premolar and molar regions preoperatively. The fracture fragments were fixed using the above fixation techniques. Then same recordings were undertaken weekly for 6 weeks and at 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Bite force increased gradually in both groups in the anterior region, premolar region (right and left) and molar region (right and left) during the follow up period except a drop in group I during the 5th week in the right molar region. A statistically significant difference was found between the change in bite force from the previous follow-up visit in groups 1 and 2. This was shown from week 1 to week 4 in the incisor region, at week 1 in the right premolar region, at week 3 in the left premolar region, at week 5, 6 and 12 in the right molar region and at week 6 and 12 in the left molar region. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference between the uses of either one or two miniplates osteosynthesis in fixation of angle fractures. The miniplate osteosynthesis had proven to be a suitable method for treating mandibular angle fractures. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| mandible fracture; angle; miniplates; bite force | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1- Natu SS, Pradhan H, Gupta H, Alam S, Gupta S, Pradhan R, et al. An epidemiological study on pattern and incidence of mandibular fractures. Plast Surg Int. 2012; 2012: 834-6.
2- Sojot AJ, Meisami T, Sandor GK, Clokie CM. Epidemiology of Mandibular Fractures Treated at the Toronto General Hospital: A Review of 246 Cases. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001; 67: 640-4.
3- Deogratius BK, Isaac MM, Farrid S. Epidemiology and management of maxillofacial fractures treated at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 1998–2003; Int Dent J. 2006; 56: 131-4.
4- Sirimaharaj W, Pyungtanasup K. The Epidemiology of Mandibular Fractures Treated at Chiang Mai University Hospital: A Review of 198 Cases. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008; 91: 868-74.
5- Barrera JE, Meyers AD. Mandibular Body Fractures Treatment & Management. available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/869123-treatment
6- Albert J, Fox MD, Robert M, Kellman MD. Mandibular angle fractures (two miniplate fixation and complications). Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003; 5: 464-9.
7- Levy F, Smith R, Odland R, Marentette L. Monocortical miniplate fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991; 117: 149-54.
8- Champy M, Lodde JP, Schmitt R, Jaeger JM, Muster D. Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. J Maxillofac Surg. 1978; 6: 14-21.
9- Tate GS, Ellis E III, Throckmorton G. Bite forces in patients treated for mandibular angle fractures: implications for fixation recommendations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994; 52: 734-6.
10-Kumar ST, Saraf S, Devi SP (2013) Evaluation of bite force after open reduction and internal fixation using microplates. J Dent 10(5):466–77
11-Sybil D, Gopalkrishnan K. Assessment of Masticatory Function Using Bite Force Measurements in Patients Treated for Mandibular Fractures. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2013;6(4):247-50. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1356755.
12-Michelet FX, Deymes J, Dessus B. Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates in maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Surg. 1973; 1: 79- 84.
13-Kuriakose MA, Fardy M, Sirikumara M, Patton DW, Sugar AW. A comparative review of 266 mandibular fractures with internal fixation using rigid (AO/ASIF) plates or miniplates. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 34: 315-21.
14-Siddiqui A, Markose G, Moos KF, McMahon J, Ayoub AF. One miniplate versus two in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective randomised study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 45: 223-5.
15-Adeyemo WL, Iwegbu IO, Bello SA, Okoturo E, Olaitan AA, Ladeinde AL, et al. Management of mandibular fractures in a developing country: a review of 314 cases from two urban centers in Nigeria. World J Surg. 2008; 32: 2631-5.
16-Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Dellavia C, Tartaglia GM. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31: 18-22.
17-Ellis E ΙΙΙ, Throckmorton GS. Bite forces after open or closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 59: 389-95.
18-Shinogaya T, Bakke M, Thomsen CE, Vilmann A, Matsumoto M. Bite force and occlusal load in healthy young subjects--a methodological study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2000; 8: 11-5
19-Van Der Bilt A, Tekamp FA, Van Der Glas HW, Abbink JH. Bite force and electromyograpy during maximum unilateral and bilateral clenching. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008; 116: 217-22.
20-Bonjardim LR, Gavião MB, Pereira LJ, Castelo PM. Bite force determination in adolescents with and without temporomandibular dysfunction J Oral Rehabil. 2005; 32: 577-83.
21-Smartt JM Jr, Low DW, Bartlett SP. The pediatric mandible: II. Management of traumatic injury or fracture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 116: 28e-41e.
22-Bell RB, Wilson DM. Is the use of arch bars or interdental wire fixation necessary for successful outcomes in the open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66: 2116-22.
23-El-Anwar MW, Sayed El-Ahl MA, Amer HS. Open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fracture without rigid maxillomandibular fixation. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 4: 314-8.
24-Alkan A, Metin M, Muglali M, Ozden B, Celebi N. Biomechanical comparison of plating techniques for fractures of the mandibular condyle. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 45:145-9.
25-Gear AJ, Apasova E, Schmitz JP, Schubert W. Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 655-63.
26-Shinogaya T, Bakke M, Thomsen CE, Vilmann A, Sodeyama A, Matsumoto M. Effects of ethnicity, gender and age on clenching force and load distribution. Clin Oral Investig. 2001; 5: 63-8.
27-Fedok FG, Van Kooten DW, DeJoseph LM, McGinn JD, Sobota B, Levin RJ, et al. Plating techniques and plate orientation in repair of mandibular angle fractures: an in vitro study. Laryngoscope. 1998; 108: 1218-24.
28-Ellis E 3rd, Walker LR. Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using one noncompression miniplate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 54: 864-71.
29-Throckmorton GS, Bushang PH, Ellis E. Improvement of maximum occlusal forces after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 54: 1080-6.
30-Haug R, Fattahi T, Goltz MA. Biomechanical evaluation of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 59: 1199-210.
31-Gerlach KL, Schwarz A. Bite forces in patients after treatment of mandibular angle fractures with miniplate osteosynthesis according to Champy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 31: 345-8.
32-Raadsheer MC, van Eijden TM, van Ginkel FC, PrahlAndersen B. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude. J Dent Res. 1999; 78: 31-42.
33-Bhatnagar A, Bansal V, Kumar S, Mowar A. Comparative analysis of osteosynthesis of mandibular anterior fractures following open reduction using stainless steel lag screws and mini plates. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2013; 12: 133-9.
34-Claes L, Eckert-Hübner K, Augat P. The fracture gap size influences the local vascularization and tissue differentiation in callus healing. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003; 388: 316-22
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 285 PDF Download: 607 |
||||
