CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF COLLAGENATED CORTICO-CANCELLOUS BONE GRAFT AFTER MANDIBULAR CYST ENUCLEATION | ||||
Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
Article 8, Volume 42, Issue 2, December 2017, Page 177-181 PDF (485.71 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2017.57923 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Abdelrahman S. El-ghamrawy* 1; Nevine S. Mohammed2; Lydia N. Melek3 | ||||
1Dentist at El-Raaya Hospital Ministry of Health, Alexandria, Egypt | ||||
2Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||||
3Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
INTRODUCTION: Dental cysts constitute a considerable share in the jaw bones disorders. The cystic lesions are the major factor causing jaw destruction. Bone grafts are used to reduce risk of jaw weakness and to shorten the period of healing after cyst enucleation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of collagenated heterologous cortico-cancellous bone mix radiologically and clinically after enculeation of mandibular cysts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of twenty-four patients suffering from cysts affecting the lower jaw bones and seeking for surgical treatment. Patients were assigned into 2 parallel groups with allocation ratio 1:1. Group A: Consisted of twelve patients, into whom Collagenated heterologous cortico-cancellous bone mix (Osteobiol® Gel 40 E, Italy) was applied as grafting material after enculeation of mandibular cyst. Group B: consisted of twelve patients with enculeated cyst without applying any grafting material acting as control. A cone beam computed tomography was performed for each patient to evaluate bone density immediately and after 6 months. RESULTS: Radiographic analysis using cone beam computerized tomography revealed that there was gradual increase in bone densities in the grafted defects. The mean value of bone density pre-operatively was 734.8 ± 105.1 HU which increased to 1634.4 ± 222.2 HU at the end of the follow up period. CONCLUSIONS: The use of collagenated cortico-cancellous bone graft greatly enhances bone deposition in bony defects | ||||
Keywords | ||||
mandibular cysts; collagenated heterologous cortico-cancellous bone mix and surgical bone defect | ||||
References | ||||
1. Klinge N, Hultin M. Berglundh T. Periimplantitis. Dent Clin N Am. 2005;661-76.
2. Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KWO, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Tooth Extraction a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014;950-8.
3. Regezi JA, Sciubba J. Clinical pathology correlation. 2nd ed. Pennsylvania: W.B. Saunders; 1993. p108-15.
4. Manor E, Kachko L, Puterman MB, Szabo G, Bodner L. Cystic Lesions of the Jaws - A Clinicopathological Study of 322 Cases and Review of the Literature. Int J Med Sci. 2012;20-6.
5. Kadam NS, De Ataide IDN, Raghava P, Fernandes F, Hede R. Management of Large Radicular Cyst by Conservative Surgical Approach: A Case Report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 239-41.
6. Kethineni B, Peddi R, Puppala R, Banavath S, Chowdary UK, Raj D. Right Attitude, Right Decision and Timely Planning in Surgical Pedodontics – Scoop Out or Expose It. J Int Oral Health. 2013;44-8.
7. Soames J V, South am J C. Hyperplastic, neoplastic, and related disorders of oral mucosa. Oral Pathology. 4th ed, Oxford University Press: New Delhi; 2005.p101-15.
8. Soliman M M, Hassan H A, Elgazaerly H, Sweedan T O. Marsupialization as a Treatment Modality of Large Jaw Cysts. WASJ. 2013;1752-9.
9. Nishijima K, Morita T, Kanehira Y, Higuchi M. Marsupialization of mandibular cystic lesions, clinical observations of 23 cases: Acta Med Okayama. 1970;373-85.
10. Howe G L. Minor Oral Surgery 3rd ed. London: Butterworth and Co; 1985. P 29-33
11.Regezi JA, Scubba JJ, Jordan RCK. Oral Pathology Clinical Pathologic Correlations. 4th ed. Saunders. St: Louis Missouri; 2003. p 241-4.
12. Nishide N, Hitomi G, Miyoshi N. Irrigation therapy of a dentigerous cyst in a geriatric patient: a case report. Spec Care Dentist. 2003;70-2.
13. Parel SM, Drane JB, Williams EO. Mandibular replacements: A review of literature. JADA.1977;120-9.
14. Tolman DE. Reconstructive procedures with endosseous implants in grafted bone: a revire of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants.1995;275-94.
15.Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RHK, Vissink A, Reintsema H. Augmentation of localized defects of the anterior maxillary ridge with autogenous bone before insertion of implants. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg.1996;1180-6.
16. Parikh S. Bone graft substitutes: past, present, future. J Postgrad Med.2002;142-8.
17. Griffith LG, Naughton G. Tissue engineering--current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science.2002;1009- 14.
18. Reddi AH. Morphogenesis and tissue engineering of bone and cartilage: inductive signals, stem cells, and biomimetic biomaterials. Tissue Eng. 2000;351-9.
19. Nakashima N, Reddi AH. The application of bone morphogenetic proteins to dental tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol.2003;1025-32
20. Covani U, Cornelini R, Barone A. Buccal bone augmentation around immediate implants with and without flap elevation: a modified approach the international journal of oral and maxillofacial implants. 2008;841-6.
21. Barone A, Cornelini R, Ciaglia R, Covani U. Implant placement in fresh extraction sockets and simultaneous osteotome sinus floor elevation: a case series international Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;841-6
22. Kotz S, Balakrishnan N, Read CB, Vidakovic B. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. 2nd ed. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Interscience; 2006.
23. Kirkpatrick LA, Feeney BC. A simple guide to IBM SPSS statistics for version 20.0. Student ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning; 2013.
24. Milthrope BK. Xenografts for tendon and ligament repair. Biomaterials.1994;745-52.
25. Sogal A, Tofe AJ. Risk assessment of bovine spongiform encephalopathy transmission through bone graft material derived from bovine bone used for dental applications. J Periodontol.1990;1053-63.
26. Traini T, Valentini P, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. A histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of anorganic bovine bone retrieved 9 years after a sinus augmentation procedure. J Periodontol 2007;955-61.
27. Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 2: Histochemical observations at 9 months. J Periodontol 2001;152-9.
28. Maiorana C, Sigurta D, Mirandola A, Garlini G, Santoro F. Sinus elevation with alloplats or xenogenic materials and implants: an up-to-4 year clinical and radiographic followup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.2006;426-32.
29. Wenz B, Oesch B, Horst M. Analysis of the risk of transmitting bovine spongiform encephalopathy through bone grafts derived from bovine bone. Biomaterials.2001; 1599-606.
30.Cawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.1988;232-6.
31. Di Stefano DA, Andreasi Bassi M, Cinci L, Pieri L, Ammirabile G. Treatment of a bone defect consequent to the removal of a periapical cyst with equine bone and equine membranes: clinical and histological outcome. Minerva Stomatol.2012;477-90.
32. Artese L, Di Stefano DA, Iezzi G, Piccirilli M, Pagnutti S, Gregorio G, et al. Treatment of mandibular atrophy by an equine bone substitute: an immunohistochemical study. Italian Oral Surgery 2012;81-9.
33.Cardaropoli D, Cardaropoli G. Healing of gingival recessions using a collagen membrane with a demineralized xenograft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009;59-67.
34. Nannmark U, Azarmehr I. Short communication: collagenated cortico-cancellous porcine bone grafts. A study in rabbit maxillary defects. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;161-3.
| ||||
Statistics Article View: 216 PDF Download: 540 |
||||