EFFECT OF TIME ELAPSED BETWEEN MIXING AND PHOTOACTIVATION ON DEGREE OF CONVERSION, WATER SORPTION AND WATER SOLUBILITY OF SELF-ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 19, Volume 41, Issue 3, December 2016, Page 344-349 PDF (1010.31 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2016.58051 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Doaa M. Aboul- Azm1; Ibrahim L. Elgayar2; Fayza H. Al-Abbassy3 | ||||
| 1Bachelor in dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt | ||||
| 2- Professor of operative dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt. | ||||
| 3- Professor of dental biomaterials, Head of Dental Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| INTRODUCTION: Self-adhesive resin cements are designed to adhere to tooth structures without separate adhesive or etchant. The major benefit of these materials would appear to be simplicity of applications with the goal of optimizing adhesive cementation procedures, selfadhesive resin cements were developed to simplify the technique and reduce the possibility of failure on the part of the operator. Low degree of conversion (DC), water sorption and solubility can compromise the mechanical properties and longevity of restorations (1-6). OBJECTIVES: Is to determine the influence of the photoactivation protocol on the degree of conversion, sorption and solubility in water of two different types of self-adhesive resin cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two different types of self-adhesive, dual cure resin cements were tested: TEGDMA (Tri-ethylene glycol di-methacrylate) based resin cement [RelyXU200 (RU), 3M ESPE] and UDMA (Urethane di- methacrylate) based resin cement [SmartCem™2 (SC2), Dentsply Caulk]. A total of one hundred and twenty cured disc shaped resin cement specimens were prepared for this study using a split teflon mold to be tested for degree of conversion, water sorption and solubility. The specimens were divided into two groups (n=60) according to the type of the cement used, group A was prepared from RU and group B was prepared from SC2. Each group was divided according to the time elapsed between handling of the resin cement and photo-activation into three subgroups (1, 2 and 3) where n=20. Half of each subgroup specimens (n=10) were used for degree of conversion test while the other half was used for water sorption and solubility test [subgroups A1 & B1 were immediately photo-activated, subgroups A2 & B2 were photo-activated 1 minute after handling the cement and subgroups A3 & B3 were photo-activated 2 minutes after handling the cement]. Ceramic disc (1.5 mm thickness and 10 mm diameter) was fabricated using copper split mold to simulate clinical condition. The specimens were irradiated for 40 seconds using LED light applied perpendicular to the specimens at zero distance between the tip of the light cure unit and the ceramic disc. Fourier transformer infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to determine the degree of conversion. For the water sorption and solubility tests specimens were stored in water bath containing distilled water at 37◦C for 90 days. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0 RESULTS: UDMA based cements showed statistically lower degree of conversion for all subgroups compared to TEGDMA based cements which showed significantly higher water sorption than the UDMA based that photo activated after 2 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The time interval between mixing and photo activation can significantly influence the properties of the cements and modify their behavior | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Self-adhesive resin; Degree of conversion; water sorption; water solubility | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1. Sigemori RM, Reis AF, Giannini M, Paulillo LA. Curing depth of a resin modified glass ionomer and two resin-based luting agents. Oper Dent.2005; 30: 185–9. 2. Arrais CA, Rueggeberg FA, Waller JL, de Goes MF, Giannini M. Effect of curing mode on the polymerization characteristics of dual-cured resin cement systems. J Dent.2005; 36: 418–26. 3. ArraisCA,GianniniM,RueggebergFA.Effectofsodium sulfinate salts on the polymerization characteristics of dual- cured resin cement systems exposed to attenuated light- activation. J Dent.2009; 37: 219–27. 4. Arrais CA, Giannini M, Rueggeberg FA. Kinetic analysis of monomer conversion in auto- and dual- polymerizing modes of commercial resin luting cements. J Prosthet Dent.2009; 101:128–36. 5. LüthyH,FilserF,LoeffelO,SchumacherM,GaucklerLJ, Hặmmerle CH. Strength and reliability of four unit all- ceramic posterior bridges. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 930-7. 6. Seghi RR, Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF. Relative fracture toughness and hardness of new dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent1995;74: 145-50. 7. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF and Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry1998; 80: 280-301. 8. Lang LA, Caputo AA. Flexural strength of a layered zirconia and porcelain dental all-ceramic system. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 125-31. 9. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of zirconia type on its bond strength with different veneer ceramics. J Prosthod 2008; 17: 401-8. 10. Al-Wahadni A. The roots of dental porcelain: A brief historical perspective. Dental News1999; 2: 43-4. 11. Drummond JL, Eliades G. Ceramic behavior under different environmental and loading conditions. Dental materials in vivo: Aging and related phenomena. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 2003; 28: 35-45. 12.Evens AG. Slow crack growth in brittle materials under dynamic loading conditions. Int J Fracture 1974;10: 251-9. 13. ISO – Dentistry. Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. Geneva: ISO 4049. (15.07.2000): 18-21. 14. Vrochari AD ,Eliades G, Hellwig E, Wrbas KT. Water sorption and solubility of four self-etching, self- adhesive resin luting agents.J Adhes Dent. 2010; 12: 39-43.
15. Cunha L, Alonso R, SobrinoL, Ferracane J. The effect of modulated photoactivation method on contraction stress, degree of conversion and bond strength of composite restorative. J Dent 2007; 35: 318-24 16.Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R, et al. Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater.2001; 17: 253-59. 17. Uctazli S, Tezvergil A, Lasella LV, Vallittu PK. Degree of conversion of fiber reinforced composite using different light curing sources. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 469-75. 18. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of two step curing on degree of conversion and softening of adental polymer.Dent Mater 2003; 19: 466-70.
19. Bowen RL. Dental filling material comprising vinyl silane treated fused silica and a binder consisting of the reaction product of bisphenol and glycidyl acrylate. USP.1962; 3: 066, 112. 20. Arrais CA, Giannini M, Rueggeberg FA. Kinetic analysis of monomer conversion in auto- and dual-polymerizing modes of commercial resin luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 101: 128-36. 21. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Peter MCRB. Curing light performance and polymerization of composite restorative materials. J Dent. 1992; 20: 183-8. 22.Marina Di Francescantonio M, Aguiar TR, Arrais CA, Cavalcanti ANMarina Di Francescantonio M, Aguiar TR, Arrais CA, Cavalcanti AN, Davanzo CU, Giannini M. Influence of viscosity and curing mode on degree of conversion of dual-cured resin cements. Eur J Dent. 2013; 7: 81–5. 23. Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, et al. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 267-82. 24. Wiggins KM, Hartung M, Althoff O, Wastian C, Mitra SB. Curing performance of a new generation light emitting diode dental curing unit. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135: 1471- 9. 25.Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, et al. Evaluation of physical properties and surface degradation of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 906-14 26. Bala O, Olmez A, Kalyci S. Effect of LED and halogen light curing on polymerization of resin based composites. J Oral Rehabi.2005; 32: 134-40 27.Santos C, Clarke RL, Braden M, Guitian F, Davy KW. Water absorption characteristics of dental composites incorporating hydroxyapatite filler. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 1897-1904. 28. Luci Regina panka Archegas, Rodrigo Nunes Rached, Segrio Aparecdo Ignacid, Elianecarvalho de Vasconcelos, Debora Toledo Ramos. Identification and Qualification of monomer released from dental composite using HPLC. Braz. Arch. Biol. technol. 2009; 52: 855. 29. Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 211-22 30. International Organization for Standardization. ISO4049: 2000- Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. Geneva: ISO; 2000; 28 31. Ilie N, Hickel R. Correlation between ceramics translucency and polymerization efficiency through ceramics. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 908-14. 32.Andrea Soares Quirino da Silva Fonseca, Jamil Mizrahi, Livia Rodrigues Menezes, Lisia Lorea Valente, Rafael Ratto de Moraeset al. The effect of time between handling and photoactivation on self-adhesive resin cement properties. J. Prosthodontics. 2014; 23: 302-7.
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 137 PDF Download: 465 |
||||
