EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT MATERIALS FOR PRE-ENDODONTIC RESTORATION OF BADLY DESTRUCTED TEETH | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 10, Volume 40, Issue 1, July 2015, Page 58-64 PDF (217.02 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58737 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| S Hamed1; A Zaazou2; N Leheta3 | ||||
| 1Bachelor of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt | ||||
| 2Assistant Professor of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt | ||||
| 3Lecturer of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Introduction: Pulpal and periradicular diseases develop when microorganisms and/or their by-products contaminate these tissues. Therefore, the major goal of endodontic restoration is to prevent the penetration of microorganisms into the coronal pulpal space and root canal system. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the sealing ability of two intermediate temporary filling materials in badly destructed teeth reinforced with stainless steel bands and to evaluate the adaptation of these materials upon application of clamps and rubber dam material. Materials and methods: 65 mature maxillary premolar teeth were used in this study. This study was divided in two parts. Part I: evaluation of coronal leakage by glucose penetration model and spectrophotometer. Teeth were randomly divided into two experimental groups (n=10) and a control group (n=15). Access cavities and stimulation of loss of tooth structure were done. Instrumentation till apical size # 35 and reinforcement with stainless steel bands were done. Group I: teeth were filled with Cavit-G (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany); Group II: teeth were filled with CLIP (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany); Group III: used as positive and negative control group. Measurement of coronal leakage was performed at the 3rd, 7th and 15th day. Part II: evaluation of adaptation of coronal restoration by using 2.5x magnifying loupes and USPHS criteria, grouping was done as before but ten teeth were used as positive controls. Results: Part I; CLIP (group II) showed the least glucose leakage with median change of leakage (1052.45) mg/dl followed by Cavit-G (Group I) with median change of (2828.55) mg/dl. The difference was statistically significant (P= 0.001). In part II; results were statistically significant (p=0.001), where the CLIP group showed better adaptation than Cavit-G group. Conclusions: CLIP seals against marginal leakage better than Cavit-G. CLIP provides better adaptation than Cavit-G on application of clamps and rubber dam. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| endodontics; temporary filling materials; coronal leakage; Cavit-G; CLIP | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1. Madison S, Swanson K, Chiles SA. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part II. Sealer types. J Endod 1987; 13:109-12.
2. Cruz EV, Shigetani Y, Ishikawa K, Kota K, Iwaku M, Goodis HE. A laboratory study of coronal microleakage using four temporary restorative materials. Int Endod J. 2002; 35: 315-20.
3. Deveaux E, Hildebert P, Neut C, Boniface B, Romond C. Bacterial microleakage of Cavit, IRM, Term. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1992; 74: 634-43.
4. Jesen AL, Abbott PV, CastroSalgado J. Interim and temporary restorations of teeth during endodontic treatment. Aust Dent J 2007; 52: S83-99.
5. Vail MM, steffel CL. Preference of temporary restorations and spacers: a survey of diplomats of the American Board of Endodontists. J Endod 2006; 32: 513-5
6. http://www.voco.com/en/products/_products/clip/.
7. Mente J, Ferk S, Dreyhaupt J, Deckert A, Legner M, Staehle HJ. Assessment of different dyes used in leakage studies. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14: 331-8.
8. Qiong Xu, Cheung SP, Deng WJ, Ling JQ, Li WL. Sucrose as a stable tracer for quantifying endodontic leakage. J DENT SCI 2012; 7: 267-71.
9. Xu Q, Fan MW, Fan B, Cheung GSP, Hu HL. A new quantitative method using glucose for analysis of endodontic leakage. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 107-11.
10. Rossomando KJ, Wendt SL Jr. Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 47-51.
11. Xu Q, Ling J, Cheung GSP, Hu Y. A quantitative evaluation of sealing ability of 4 obturation techniques by using a glucose leakage test. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pahtol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 109-13.
12. Xu Q, Fan MW, Fan B, Cheung GSP, Hu HL. A new quantitative method using glucose for analysis of endodontic leakage. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 107-11.
13. Kim SY, Ahn JS, Yi YA, Lee Y, Hwang JY, Seo DG. Quantitative microleakage analysis of endodontic temporary filling materials using a glucose penetration model. Acta Odontol Scand 2015; 73:137-43.
14. Cvar JF, Ryge G: criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. San Franscisco, Government printing office, 1971.
15. Lee YC, Yang SF, Hwang YF, Chueh LH, Chung KH Microleakage of endodontic temporary restorative materials. J Endod 1993; 19: 516-20.
16. Galvan RR Jr, West LA, Liewehr FR, Pashley DH. Coronal microleakage of five materials used to create an intracoronal seal in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2002; 28:59-61.
17. Fathi B, Bahcall J, Maki JS. An in vitro comparison of bacterial leakage of three common restorative materials used as an intracoronal barrier. J Endod 2007; 33:872-4.
18. Koagel SO, Mines P, Apicella M, Sweet M. In Vitro Study to Compare the Coronal Microleakage of Tempit UltraF, Tempit, IRM, and Cavit by Using the Fluid Transport Model. J Endod 2008; 34: 442– 4.
19. Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1976. 88.
20. Anderson RW, Powell BJ, Pashley DH. Microleakage of temporary restorations in complex endodontic access preparations. J Endod 1989; 15: 526-9.
21. Ciftci A, Vardarli DA, Sonmez IS. Coronal microleakage of four endodontic temporary restorative materials: An in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: e67-70.
22. Erdemir A, Eldeniz AU, Belli S. Effect of temporary filling materials on repair bond strengths of composite resins. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 86B:303-9.
23. James J, John O. Burgess, James B. Summitt. Fracture resistance of amalgam coronal-radicular restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 607-13.
24. Webber RT, del Rio CE, Brady JM, Segall RO. Sealing quality of a temporary filling material. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978; 46: 123-30.
25. Heffer R. Orthodontic band reinforced interim endodontic restorations: structural integrity and microbial penetration (MDSc thesis). Nedlands, Australia: University of Western Australia; 2007.
26. Pane ES, Palamara J. E. A, Messer HH. Stainless steel bands in endodontics: effects on cuspal flexure and fracture resistance. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 467–71.
27. Noguera AP, McDonald NJ. A Comparative in Vitro Coronal Microleakage Study of New Endodontic Restorative Materials. J Endod 1990; 16: 523-7.
28. Pommel L, Camps J. In vitro apical leakage of system B compared with other filling techniques. J Endod 2001; 27:449-51.
29. Todd MJ, Harrison JW. An evaluation of the immediate and early sealing properties of Cavit. J Endod 1979; 5: 362-7.
30. Beach CW, Calhoun JC, Bramwell JD, Hutter JW, Miller GA. clinical evaluation of bacterial leakage of endodontic temporary filling materials. J Endod 1996; 22: 459-62.
31. Ludlow M, Hermsen K. An in-vitro investigation comparing the marginal leakage of Cavit, Cavit-G, and TERM. Gen Dent 1989; 37:214-7.
32. Gilles JA, Huget EF, Stone RC. Dimensional stability of temporary restoratives. Oral Surg 1975; 40:796-800.
33. Oppenheimer S, Rosenberg PA. Effect of temperature change on the sealing properties of Cavit and Cavit G. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 1979;48, 250-3.
34. Uranga A, Blum JY, Esber S, Parahy E, Prado C. A comparative study of four coronal obturation materials in endodontic treatment. J Endod 1999; 25: 178-80.
35. Odabas ME, Tulunoglu O, Ozalp SO, Bodur H. Microleakage of different temporary filling materials in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2009; 34:157-60.
36. Tulunoglu O, Uçtasli MB, Ozdemir S. Coronal microleakage of temporary restorations in previously restored teeth with amalgam and composite. Oper Dent 2005; 30:331-7.
37. Lim KC. Microleakage of intermediate restorative materials. J Endod 1990; 16: 116-8.
38. Qvist V. The effect of mastication on marginal adaptation of composite restorations in vivo. J Dent Res 1983; 62:904-6.
39. Widerman FH, Eames WB, Serene TP. The physical and biologic properties of Cavit. JADA 1971; 82, 378– 82.
40. Rutledge RE, Montgomery S. Effect of intracanal medicaments on the sealing ability of TERM. J Endod 1990; 6, 260–4. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 301 PDF Download: 423 |
||||
