BOND STRENGTH AND INTERFACIAL MORPHOLOGY OF A MULTIMODE ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENT TO ENAMEL AND DENTIN | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 1, Volume 40, Issue 2, December 2015, Page 133-139 PDF (4.27 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.59122 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| A Holiel* ; W Abdel-Fattah* ; B El Mallakh* | ||||
| Instructor at the Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Introduction: Resin cements are used for cementation of indirect restorations. A high-quality adhesion to tooth structure is primordial for the success of indirect cemented restorations. Objectives: Were to assess the shear bond strength of RelyX ultimate adhesive resin cement to both enamel and dentin when used in different application modes (self-etch and total-etch) and to study resin-tooth interfaces using SEM. Materials and methods: 40 enamel specimens and 40 dentin specimens were used in this study. Each substrate specimens were randomly divided into four groups of 10 specimens each according to resin cement applied: Enamel groups: Group A1: RelyX ultimate as total-etch; Group < br />A2: RelyX ultimate as self-etch; Group A3: Variolink II; Group A4: Multilink automix. Dentin groups: Group B1: RelyX ultimate as total-etch; Group B2: RelyX ultimate as self-etch; Group B3: Variolink II; Group B4: Multilink automix. Resin cements were built over the surfaces following manufacturer's instructions in a plastic tube. All specimens were thermocycled (500 cycles, 5°/55°C, 15 sec dwell time) then shear bond strength was measured in MPa and data were analyzed using F-test (ANOVA) and Post Hoc test. Three specimens from each group were further sectioned, gold sputtered and evaluated under SEM. Results: All enamel groups showed a statistically significant difference for shear bond strength with P value of 35.60 MPa. While for dentin, there was no statistically significant differences among groups with P=0.053. Interfacial morphology of RelyX ultimate in total-etch mode showed better interface morphology and improved tag length compared to respective self-etch counterpart Conclusions: An etching step prior to multi-mode adhesive resin cement increased its bond strength values and improved its penetration pattern to both enamel and dentin, also length of resin tags formed by total-etch adhesives seems not to play an important role in determining bond strength | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Resin cements; Adhesives; Multi-mode; dental substrates; bonding; interface | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1. Manhart J, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Chen HY, Hickel R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Invest 2000; 4:192–8.
2. Piwowarczyk A, Bender R, Ottl P, Lauer HC. Longterm bond between dual-polymerizing cementing agents and human hard dental tissue. Dent Mater 2007; 23:211-7.
3. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007; 23:71-80.
4. Fukuda R, Yoshida Y, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Inoue S, Sano H, et al. Bonding efficacy of polyalkenoic acids to hydroxyapatite of enamel and dentin. Biomaterials 2003; 24:1861-7.
5. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, VanHerle G, et al. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. Am J Dent 2003; 16:329-34.
6. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28:215-35.
7. Toledano M, Osório R, de Leonardi G, Rosales-Leal JI, CeballoL, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA. Influence of selfetching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 205-10.
8. Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8:327-35.
9. Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, Munck J De, Peumans M, Lambrechts, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acidetching. J Dent 2006; 34:77-85.
10. Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Falconi M, Petschelt A, et al. Influence of preliminary etching on the stability of bonds created by one-step self-etch bonding systems. Euro J Oral Sci 2012; 120:239-48.
11. Erhardt MC, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Proenca JP, Osorio R, Toledano M. Influence of dentin acid-etching and NaOCl treatment on bond strengths of self-etch adhesives. Am J Dent 2008; 21: 44-8.
12. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multimode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012; 40:475-84.
13. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014; 42: 800-7.
14. Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013; 41:404- 11.
15. http://Www.3m.com/RelyX ultimate/technical data sheet 2013.
16. Özcan M, Mese A. Adhesion of conventional and simplified resin-based luting cements to superficial and deep dentin. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16:1081-8.
17. Aguiar TR, Andre CB, Arrais CA, Bedran-Russo AK, Giannini M. Micromorphology of resin–dentin interfaces using self-adhesive and conventional resin cements: A confocal laser and scanning electron microscope analysis. Int. J. Adhes. 2012; 38:69-74.
18. Torii Y, Itou K, Hikasa R, Iwata S, Nishitani Y. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resinenamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehab 2002; 29:528-33.
19. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Yoshida E, Hori M, Sano H, Kaga M, et al. Resin-enamel bonds made with selfetching primers on ground enamel. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111: 447-53.
20. Pivetta MR, Moura SK, Barroso LP, Lascala AC, Reis A, Loguercio AD, et al. Bond strength and etching pattern of adhesive systems to enamel: effects of conditioning time and enamel preparation. J Esthet Rest Dent 2008; 20: 322-35.
21. Pashley D, Tay F. Agressiveness of contemporary selfetching adhesives. Part 2: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001; 17:430-44.
22. Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Kimmes NS. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to pre-etched enamel. Dent Mater 2009; 25:1187-94.
23. Li N, Nikaido T, Alireza S, Takagaki T, Chen J-H, Tagami J. Phosphoric acid-etching promotes bond strength and formation of acid-base resistant zone on enamel. Oper Dent 2012; 38:82-90.
24. Watanabe T, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T. Effect of prior acid etching on bonding durability of single-step adhesives. Oper Dent 2008;33:426-33.
25. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Irie M, Ogawa T, et al. Nano- layering of phosphoric acid ester monomer on enamel and dentin. Acta Biomater 2011;7:3187-95.
26. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, et al. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012; 91:376-81.
27. Van Landuyt KL, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Okazaki M, et al. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res 2008; 87:757-61.
28. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007; 28:3757-85.
29. Chiba Y, Rikuta A, Yasuda G, Yamamoto A, Takamizawa H. Influence of moisture conditions on dentin bond strength of single-step self-etch adhesive systems. J Oral Sci 2006; 48: 131-7.
30. Yin M, Luo XP, Yao H, Liu X. Comparison of shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic and dentin. Chin J of Stomatol 2009; 44:113-6.
31. Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Osorio R, Casucci A, Toledano M, Ferrari M. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on self-adhesive cements bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 2008; 24:1156-63.
32. Gwinnett AJ. Altered tissue contribution to interfacial bond strength with acid conditioned dentin. Am J Dent 1994; 7:243-6.
33. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho R, Sano H, Horner J, Brewer PD, Pashley D. Interfacial morphology and strength of bonds made to superficial versus deep dentin. Am J Dent 1995; 8:297-302.
34. Tao L, Pashley DH. Shear bond strengths to dentin: effects of surface treatments, depth and position. Dent Mater 1988; 4:371-8.
35. Sabatini C. Effect of phosphoric acid etching on the shear bond strength of two self-etch adhesives. J Appl Oral Sci 2013; 21:56-62.
36. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Endo K, Kaga M, Sano H, Oguchi H. The effect of hybrid layer thickness on bond strength: demineralized dentin zone of the hybrid layer. Dent Mater 2000; 16:406-11.
37. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Albaladejo A, Aguilera FS, Ferrari M, Tay FR, et al. Effects of adhesive systems and luting agents on bonding of fiber posts to root dentin. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2006;77: 195-200.
38. Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, Beloica M, Papacchini F, Ferrari M. In vitro evaluation of bonding effectiveness to dentin of all-in-one adhesives. J Dent 2010; 38: 106-12.
39. Kenshima S, Reis A, Uceda-Gomez N, Tancredo L, Filho LE, Nogueira FN, et al. Effect of smear layer thickness and pH of self-etching adhesive systems on the bond strength and gap formation to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7:117-26.
40. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Mine A, et al. Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater 2010;6: 3573-82. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 162 PDF Download: 941 |
||||
