CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF THE OSSEOINTEGRATION, BONE LEVEL, BONE DENSITY AROUND SHORT DENTAL IMPLANTS IN POSTERIOR ATROPHIC MAXILLA | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 13, Volume 41, Issue 1, April 2016, Page 78-85 PDF (965.51 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2016.59178 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Harby Gamalat A* ; Ghamrawy Sherif H El* ; Aly Tarek M* | ||||
| Dentist, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| INTRODUCTION: Edentulous ridge in the posterior maxilla is often compromised by reduced bone volume. This anatomical condition limits the implant placement without sinus augmentation. The use of short implant minimizes the need of more extensive sinus floor elevation, thus reducing the duration and morbidity of the treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the osseointegration, bone level and bone density around short dental implants in posterior atrophic maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty short implants (Euroteknika-74700 sallanches-FRANCE) were inserted in posterior atrophic maxilla in ten adult patients. The bone density of implants recipient sites was determined by gray scale using CBCT. The implants’ stability was measured by resonance frequency analysis using Osstell ISQ. The bone level around the implant was measured by image J program. The values were determined immediately post-operatively and on intervals of 1, 3 & 6 months. RESULTS: The mean bone density value was (1522.0±137.14) at the site of implant placement preoperatively and (1649.50± 102.93), (1832.95±92.41), (1934.25± 82.72) at 1st, 3rd and 6th months postoperative respectively, there was a statistical significant increase. The mean implant stability value was (60.30+6.09) immediately post-operatively, then increased to (70.06±4.61) on the 6th month, there was a statistical significant increase. The marginal bone level immediately postoperatively was (0.54 ± 0.10 mm), on the 3rd month it was (0.62 ± 0.12 mm), on the 6th month it was (0.69 ± 0.15 mm) and on the 9th month it was (0.79 ± 0.21 mm). There was a statistically significant increase. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that short implants might be a preferable choice to place in atrophic posterior maxilla since the treatment is faster, cheaper and associated with less morbidity, however their long-term prognosis is unknown. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| atrophic maxilla; Short implant; bone density; Marginal bone level; implant stability | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1- Das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants-an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 86-93.
2- Renourd F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 35-51.
3- Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implants treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Revi 2009; 7: CD003607.
4- Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Kwan S, Worthington HW, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Chichester U: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2008.
5- Fontana F, Santoro F, Maiorana C, Lezzi G, Piattelli A, Simion M. Clinical and histologic evaluation of allogenic bone matrix versus autogenous bone chips associated with titanium-rein-forced e-PTFE membrane for vertical ridge augmentation: a prospective pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 1003-12.
6- Felice P, Marchetti C, Piattelli A, Pellegrino G, Checchi V, Worthington H, et al. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpostitional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone. Results up to delivery of the final prostheses from a split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2008; 1: 183-7.
7- Hallman M, Senneby L, lundgren S. A clinical and histological evaluation of implants integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20: 80 mixture. Int J of Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 635-43.
8- Felice P, Cannizzaro G, Checchi V, Pellegrino G, Censi P, Esposito M. Vertical bone augmentation versus 7 mm long dental implants in posterior atrophic mandibles. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009; 2: 7-20.
9- Cannizzaro G, Felice P, Leone M, Viola P, Esposito M. Early loading of hydroxyapatite coated implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: lateral sinus lift with autogenous bone and Bio-Oss versus cretal mini-sinus lift and 8 mm implants. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009; 25-38.
10-Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branmark OI. A 15- year study of osseointegarted implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10: 387-416.
11-Sennerby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 408-20.
12-O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2: 85-92.
13-Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implant Res 2001; 12: 423-32.
14-Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindestrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981; 52: 155-70.
15-Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 261-7.
16-Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Posthumus JB, Stewart RE. Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rehabil Res 2008; 31: 165-9.
17-Muhlemnn HR. Psychological and chemical mediators of gingival health. J preventive Dent 1977; 4: 6-15.
18-Glavind L, Loe H. Errors in the clinical assessment of periodontal destruction. J Periodont Res 1976; 2: 180-4.
19-Kirkpatrick LA, Feeney BC. A simple guide to IBM SPSS statistics for version 20.0. Student ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2013.
20-Rosen MD, Sarnat BG. Change of volume of the maxillary sinus of the dog after extraction of adjacent teeth. Oral Sur Oral Med Oral Pathol 1955; 8: 420-9.
21-Bornstein MM, Cionca N, Mombelli A. Systemic conditions and treatments as risks for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 12-27.
22-Leonhardt A, Dahlen G, Renvert S. Five- year clinical, microbiological and radiological outcome following treatment of peri- implantitis in man. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 1415-22.
23-Inbarajan A, Veeravalli PT, Vaidyanathan AK, Grover M. Short-term evaluation of dental implants in a diabetic population: an in vivo study. J Adv Prosthodont 2012; 4: 134-8.
24-Nociti F, Cesar N, Carvalho M, Sallum E. Bone denisty around titanium implants may be influenced by intermittent cigarette smoke inhalation: A histometric study in rats. Int J Oral maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 347-52.
25-Visch L, Van Waas M, Schmitz P, Levendag P. A clinical evaluation of implants in irradiated oral cancer patients. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 856-9.
26-Manfredini D, Poggio CE, Lobbezoo F. Is Bruxism a risk factor for dental implants? A Systemic Review of the Litrature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 16: 460-9.
27-Rios HF, Avila G, Galindo P, Bratu E, Wang HL. The influence of remaining alveolar bone upon lateral window sinus augmentation implant survival. Implant Dent 2009; 18:402-12.
28-Nedir R, Bischof M, Vazquez L, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP. Osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting material: a 1-year prospective pilot study with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 679-86.
29-Kim SJ, Kim MR, Rim JS, Chung SM, Shin SW. Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatmen ts in dog bone. J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18: 415-20.
30-Sogo M, Ikebe K, Yang TC, Wada M, Maeda Y. Assessment of bone density in the posterior maxilla based on Hounsfield units to enhance the initial stability of implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14: e183-7.
31-Yunus B. Assessment of the increased calcification of the jaw bone with CT-Scan after dental implantplacement. Imaging Sci Dent 2011; 41: 59-62.
32-Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8:226-33.
33-Gotfredsen K, Nimb L, Hjorting-Hansen E, Jensen JS, Holmen A. Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 3: 77-84.
34-Yoon HG, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Lee SY. Effect of bone quality and implant surgical technique on implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. J Adv Prosthodont 2011; 3:10-5.
35-Turkyilmaz I, Aksoy U, McGlumphy EA. Two alternative surgical techniques for enhancing primary implant stability in the posteriormaxilla: a clinical study including bone density, insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis data. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008; 10: 231-7.
36-Glauser R, Zembic A, Ruhstaller P, Windisch S. Fiveyear results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97:S59-68.
37-Kim SJ, Kim MR, Rim JS, Chung SM, Shin SW. Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone. J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18: 415-20.
38-Farré-Pagés N, Augé-Castro ML, Alaejos-Algarra F, Mareque-Bueno J, Ferrés-Padró E, Hernández-Alfaro F. Relation between bone density and primary implant stability. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 16: e62-7. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 175 PDF Download: 1,310 |
||||
