IN VITRO COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LAVA ULTIMATE CAD/CAM RESTORATIVE SYSTEM IN COMPARISON TO IPS E-MAX PRESS | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 7, Volume 41, Issue 2, August 2016, Page 156-162 PDF (758.3 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2016.59271 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Dogheim Ali Y.* ; El Kady Ahmed S.* ; Ghoneim Mona M.* ; Abdelmotie Maha A.* | ||||
| Resident at Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| INTRODUCTION: The increasing demand for esthetics stimulated research in metal-free, tooth-colored restorations. OBJECTIVES: The study compares the biaxial flexural strength, surface roughness and color stability of CAD/CAM nano ceramic optimized composite resin Lava Ultimate material (3M ESPE), pressable ceramic IPS e-max (ivoclar vivadent) and feldspathic porcelain VM7(VITA) MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety specimens were used, divided into three groups 30 specimens each: first group of Lava Ultimate discs, second group of E-max Press discs and third group of VM7 discs: each group was divided into three subgroups ten specimens each: 10 specimens were subjected to biaxial flexural strength test using universal testing machine, 10 to surface roughness test using profilometer and 10 for color stability test using spectrophotometer. RESULTS: On comparing the biaxial flexural strength test there was no significant difference between Lava ultimate group and E-max press, while there was a significant increase in strength in Lava ultimate and E-max press group than the VM7. As for the surface roughness test there was no significant difference between Lava ultimate and E-max press, while there was a significant increase in roughness in VM7 group than Lava ultimate and E-max press groups. The Color difference in the three groups showed a significant increase in ΔE in Lava ultimate than E-max press. Also, there was a significant decrease in ΔE in VM7 group than Lava ultimate and E-max press groups. CONCLUSIONS: The E-max press and the Lava Ultimate showed significantly higher biaxial flexural strength values and significantly lower surface roughness compared to VM7. Lava Ultimate has the least color stability due to its composite matrix although it could be repolished. VM7 is the most color stable so it could be used as veneers although it is the weakest ceramic in the study. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Biaxial Flexural Strength; Surface roughness; color stability | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1. Christensen GJ. In-office CAD/CAM milling of restorations. The future? J Amer Dent Assoc. 2008; 139: 83- 5.
2. Giordano R. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM-produced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137(Suppl): 14S-21S.
3. Lava ultimate restorative brochure – CEREC-3M. Available at: http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/756167O/lavaultimate-cad-cam-restorativecerec.pdf?fn=lava_ultimate_brochure_cerec-for.
4. Magne P, Kenezevic A. Simulated fracture resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restoration on endodontically treated molar. Quintessence Int. 2009; 40: 125-33.
5. Belli R, Geinzer E, Muschweck A, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations. Dent Mater. 2014; 30: 424-32.
6. Scientific Documentation IPS e.max® Press. Ivoclar Vivadent. p 6.
7. Queiroz JR, Benetti P, Ozcan M, de Oliveira LF, Della Bona A, Takahashi FE, et al. Surface characterization of feldspathic ceramic using ATR FT-IR and ellipsometry after various silanization protocols. Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 189-96.
8. Alghazzawi TF, Janowski GM. Correlation of flexural strength of coupons versus strength of crowns fabricated with different zirconia materials with and without aging. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015; 146: 904-12.e1.
9. Mohsen C. Corrosion effect on the flexural strength & micro-hardness of ips e-max ceramics. OJST. 2011; 1: 29- 35.
10. Puri S. Techniques used to fabricate all-ceramic restorations in the dental practice. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005; 26: 519-25; quiz 526-7.
11.Cattel MJ, Knowles JC, Clarke RL, Lynch E. The bi-axial flexural strength of two pressable ceramic systems. J Dent. 1999; 27: 183-96.
12.International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6872: 1995, Dental ceramic. Geneva: ISO; 1995.
13. Ebeid K, Wille S, Hamdy A, Salah T, El-Etreby A, Kern M. Effect of changes in sintering parameters on monolithic translucent zirconia. Dent Mater. 2014; 30: e419-24.
14. Arocha MA, Mayoral JR, Lefever D, Mercade M, Basilio J, Roig M. Color stability of siloranes versus methacrylateased composites after immersion in staining solutions. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17: 1481-7.
15. Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010; 38(Suppl 2): e2-16.
16. Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 101: 193-9.
17. Filho HL, Maia LH, Araújo MV, Eliast CN, Ruellas AC. Colour stability of aesthetic brackets: ceramic and plastic. Aust Orthod J. 2013; 29: 13- 20.
18. Oh SC, Dong JK, Lüthy H, Shärer P. Strength and microstructure of IPS Empress 2 glass-ceramic after different surface treatments. Int J Prosthodont. 2000; 13: 468-72.
19. Sadighpour L, Geramipanah F, Raeesi B. In vitro mechanical tests for modern dental ceramics. J Dent (Tehran). 2006; 3: 143-52.
20. Charlton DG, Roberts HW, Tiba A. Measurement of select physical and mechanical properties of 3 mechinable ceramic materials. Quintessence Int. 2008; 39: 573-9.
21. Buso L, Oliveira-Júnior OB, Hiroshi Fujiy F, Leão Lombardo GH, Ramalho Sarmento H, Campos F, et al. Biaxial flexural strength of CAD/CAM ceramics. Minerva Stomatol. 2011; 60: 311-9.
22. Kassem AS, Atta O, El-Mowafy O. Combined effects of thermocycling and load-cycling on microleakage of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture molar crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2011; 24: 376-8.
23. Albero A, Pascual A, Camps I, Grau-Benitez M. Comparative characterization of a novel cad-cam polymerinfiltrated-ceramic-network. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015; 7: e495-500.
24. Fasbinder DJ. Nano-Ceramic Restorative Block. A new material is available for chairside CAD/CAM restorations. Inside Dentistry. 2012; 8. Available at: https://www.dentalaegis.com/id/2012/02/nano-ceramicrestorative-block
25. Stachowiak GW, Batchelor AW, Stachowiak GB. Experimental methods in tribology. 44th ed. Amsterdam, Oxford: Elsevier, 2004.
26. Wennerberg A, Ohlsson R, Rosen BG, Andersson B. Characterizing three-dimensional topography of engineering and biomaterial surfaces by confocal laser scanning and stylus techniques. Med Eng Phys. 1996;18:548–56.
27. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. High‑strength CAD/CAM‑fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings – A new fabrication mode for all‑ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 121-8.
28. Kursoglu P, Karagoz Motro PF, Kazazoglu E. Correlation of surface texture with the stainability of ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 306-13.
29. Isgró G, Addison O, Fleming GJ. Transient and residual stresses in a pressable glass‑ceramic before and after resin ‑cement coating determined using profilometry. J Dent. 2011; 39: 368-75.
30. Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Roos M, Trottmann A, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH. Load‑bearing capacity and failure types of anterior zirconia crowns veneered with overpressing and layering techniques. Dent Mater. 2011; 27: 1045-53.
31. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. influence of food stimulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005; 33: 389-98.
32. Khokhar ZA, Razzoog ME, Yaman P. Colour stability of restorative resins. Quintessence Int. 1991; 22: 733-7.
33. Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res. 1989; 68: 1760-4.
34. Yannikakis SA, Zissis AJ, Polyzois GL, Caroni C. Colour stability of provisional resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80: 533-9.
35. Um CM, Ruyter IE. Staining of resin-based veneering materials with coffee and tea. Quintessence Int. 1991; 22: 377-86.
36. Yannikakis SA, Zissis AJ, Polyzois GL, Caroni C. Colour stability of provisional resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80:533-9.
37. Ghahramanloo A, Madani AS, Sohrabi K, Sabzevari S. An evaluation of color stability of reinforced composite resin compared with dental porcelain in commonly consumed beverages. J Can Dent Assoc. 2008;136:673-80.
38.Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res.1989; 68: 819-22.
39. Koksal T, Dikbas I. Color stability of different denture teeth materials against various staining agents. Dent Mater J. 2008; 27: 139-44.
40. Sulieman M. An overview of tooth discoloration; extrinsic, intrinsic and internalized stains. Dent Update. 2005; 32: 463-4, 466-8,471. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 466 PDF Download: 533 |
||||
