Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in evaluation of rectal cancer aggressiveness
salem, A., Assy, M., Refaat, M. (2020). Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in evaluation of rectal cancer aggressiveness. EKB Journal Management System, 26(6), 1038-1047. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2019.17285.1537
ahmed fekry salem; Mostafa Mohamad Assy; Mona Mohammed Refaat. "Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in evaluation of rectal cancer aggressiveness". EKB Journal Management System, 26, 6, 2020, 1038-1047. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2019.17285.1537
salem, A., Assy, M., Refaat, M. (2020). 'Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in evaluation of rectal cancer aggressiveness', EKB Journal Management System, 26(6), pp. 1038-1047. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2019.17285.1537
salem, A., Assy, M., Refaat, M. Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in evaluation of rectal cancer aggressiveness. EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 26(6): 1038-1047. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2019.17285.1537

Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in evaluation of rectal cancer aggressiveness

Zagazig University Medical Journal
Article 18, Volume 26, Issue 6, November 2020, Page 1038-1047  XML PDF (633.66 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2019.17285.1537
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
ahmed fekry salem email orcid 1; Mostafa Mohamad Assyorcid 2; Mona Mohammed Refaat3
1Department of Radiodiagnosis, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
2Department od Radiodiagnosis, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
3radiodiagnosis,faculty of medicine,zagazig university,egypt
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the importance of diffusion-weighted MRI imaging (DWI) as a truthful marker for detection of rectal cancer tumor aggressiveness, by studying the relation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the tumors, MRI findings and pathological factors for prognosis. Methods: Between October 2017 and May 2019, the study included 80 patients have been proved to have carcinoma of the rectum by colonoscopic biopsy and histopathological assessment. All patients were assessed prior to surgery and neo-adjuvant therapy with standard MRI and diffusion weight images. Results: The mean ADC values are lower with poor prognostic factors for tumors with high CEA levels more than 5 ng/ml (P = 0.004), positive nodal disease (P = 0.0001), positive LVI invasion (P = 0.0001), with increasing T stage (P = 0.0001) and significantly lower among poorly differentiated tumors (P = 0.0341). There is also a significant positive correlation (r = 0.487; P = 0.0001) between ADC values and the distance from the tumor to the MRF. Conclusion: Our study suggests that quantitative measurement of ADC values can be used in preoperative assessment of degree of rectal cancer progression. ADC is capable of becoming a realistic imaging biomarker of tumor profile aggressiveness.
Keywords
Rectal carcinoma; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; diffusion weighted imaging; ADC value
Statistics
Article View: 351
PDF Download: 323