A Comparative Study Between Telescopic and Ball and Socket Attachments Used for Maxillary Implant Supported Single Dentures
Salem, S., Abd el-Fattah, A., Kabeel, S., Ibraheem, E., El Zawahry, M. (2020). A Comparative Study Between Telescopic and Ball and Socket Attachments Used for Maxillary Implant Supported Single Dentures. EKB Journal Management System, 7(1), 67-72. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2019.7707.1093
Sherihan H. Salem; Amany A. Abd el-Fattah; Shereen M. Kabeel; Eman M. Ibraheem; Mohamed El Zawahry. "A Comparative Study Between Telescopic and Ball and Socket Attachments Used for Maxillary Implant Supported Single Dentures". EKB Journal Management System, 7, 1, 2020, 67-72. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2019.7707.1093
Salem, S., Abd el-Fattah, A., Kabeel, S., Ibraheem, E., El Zawahry, M. (2020). 'A Comparative Study Between Telescopic and Ball and Socket Attachments Used for Maxillary Implant Supported Single Dentures', EKB Journal Management System, 7(1), pp. 67-72. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2019.7707.1093
Salem, S., Abd el-Fattah, A., Kabeel, S., Ibraheem, E., El Zawahry, M. A Comparative Study Between Telescopic and Ball and Socket Attachments Used for Maxillary Implant Supported Single Dentures. EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 7(1): 67-72. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2019.7707.1093

A Comparative Study Between Telescopic and Ball and Socket Attachments Used for Maxillary Implant Supported Single Dentures

Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls
Article 9, Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2020, Page 67-72  XML PDF (649.04 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2019.7707.1093
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Sherihan H. Salem email orcid 1; Amany A. Abd el-Fattah2; Shereen M. Kabeel3; Eman M. Ibraheem4; Mohamed El Zawahry5
1Researcher Assistant of Removable Prosthodontics, Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics Department, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt
2Professor of Removable Prosthodontics and Vice Dean of Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
3Lecturer of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
4Associate Professor of Removable Prosthodontics, Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics Department, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt
5Professor of Removable Prosthodontics and Chairman of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics Department, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Purpose: This study was conducted to compare between maxillary implant-supported overdentures retained by telescopic and ball and socket regarding retention. Material and Methods: seven male patients had completely edentulous maxilla free from any systemic disease that might affect bone metabolism was selected to participate in this study. Each patient received four dental implants in the edentulous maxilla using computer guided surgical stent. Implants had enough antero-posterior spread so that load can be distributed equally. Once the implant osseointegration appears to be satisfactory, the maxillary four implants were loaded with two different attachments as follow; Group I: All patients received maxillary single denture retained with ball and socket attachments and used it for three months. Group II: After a wash up period of two weeks, all patients received another newly constructed maxillary single denture retained with telescopic attachments and used it for another three months. Retention of both groups was measured using universal testing machine. The assessment was made at time of insertion, one month and three months follow-up period. Results: Group II showed higher retention values compared to Group I. Conclusion: ball and socket attachment as well as telescopic attachment showed decrease in retention but telescopic attachment revealed a higher score than ball attachment due to frictional retention.
Keywords
Implant; telescopic; ball and socket; attachment
Statistics
Article View: 332
PDF Download: 469