Effect of Cyclic Loading on the Strength of Flexor Tendon Repair in Vitro Study | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Al-Azhar Medical Journal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article 27, Volume 49, Issue 1, January 2020, Page 319-328 PDF (671.73 K) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: 10.21608/amj.2020.67557 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Authors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abd Elhakim Abd Allah Massoud; Amro A. Fouaad ; Mahmoud Saad Mohammed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hand and Microsurgery Unite, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine - Al Azhar University | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Background: The initial strength of the repair depends on the material properties and knot security of the sutures as well as on the holding capacity of the suture grip of the tendon. Objective: Detecting the effect of cyclic loading on the strength of flexor tendon repair using 6 strand Tang suture experimentally. Materials and Methods: In the present ex vivo study of 50 sheep flexor tendons, six strand Tang suture technique was used: Twenty five repairs were subjected to cyclic tensile testing, and twenty five repairs were subjected to static tensile testing using 4/0 polypropylene simple suture material + epitendinous continuous running sutures using 5/0 polypropylene suture material. Results: The results of the study showed that 44 % survival at 41.7 N cyclic testing, without evidence of significant gap formation or rupture and the breaking force on continuous loading mean 55.95 N. The Tang suture method provided much more sufficient gap resistance and tensile strength able to withstand early active mobilization after primary flexor tendon repair. Conclusion: The Tang suture method provided sufficient gap resistance and tensile strength able to withstand early active mobilization after primary flexor tendon repair. There were some disadvantages regarding to time consuming during surgery and difficult to use in pediatrics and small tendons. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keywords | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flexor tendon repair; six strand Tang suture; yield force | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of Cyclic Loading on the Strength of Flexor Tendon Repair in Vitro Study Abd Elhakim Abd Allah Massoud, Amro A. Fouaad Hand and Microsurgery Unite, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine - Al Azhar University Corresponding author: Amro . A. Fouaad, Elbiady2020@gmail.com ABSTRACT Background: The initial strength of the repair depends on the material properties and knot security of the sutures as well as on the holding capacity of the suture grip of the tendon. Objective: Detecting the effect of cyclic loading on the strength of flexor tendon repair using 6 strand Tang suture experimentally. Materials and Methods: In the present ex vivo study of 50 sheep flexor tendons, six strand Tang suture technique was used: Twenty five repairs were subjected to cyclic tensile testing, and twenty five repairs were subjected to static tensile testing using 4/0 polypropylene simple suture material + epitendinous continuous running sutures using 5/0 polypropylene suture material. Results: The results of the study showed that 44 % survival at 41.7 N cyclic testing, without evidence of significant gap formation or rupture and the breaking force on continuous loading mean 55.95 N. The Tang suture method provided much more sufficient gap resistance and tensile strength able to withstand early active mobilization after primary flexor tendon repair. Conclusion: The Tang suture method provided sufficient gap resistance and tensile strength able to withstand early active mobilization after primary flexor tendon repair. There were some disadvantages regarding to time consuming during surgery and difficult to use in pediatrics and small tendons. Keywords: Flexor tendon repair, six strand Tang suture, yield force
INTRODUCTION Numbers of factors affect the functional biomechanics of flexor tendon repair, 1st factor is intact pulley system which prevent bowstring of the flexor tendon, 2nd factor is synovial fluid for nutrition to The tendon, lubrication and permitting frictionless gliding between the tendons, 3rd factor supple joints to permit motion &if stiffness occur affect tendon function, Finally tendon excursion which is important factor for tendon function biomechanics (Manske, 2005). In case of tendon injury you should assess &make good evaluation of injury to trying to regain this functional biomechanics of the tendon, so initial strength of repair depend on 2 factor, 1st material properties (suture caliber & material itself),2nd knot security of the suturing (McDowell et al., 2002). The case improved by increase numbers of strands crossing The repair site (Barrie et al., 2001). Finally the holding capacity of the repair of the tendon depend on configuration (Taras et al., 2001), size (Xie and Tang, 2005) & number of grips (Xie et al., 2005). Physiotherapy after operation is very important step with main purpose which is the protection of the tendon from adhesion by keeping it active. Depending on 3 factor, 1st power of suture should be more than the power that applied during the therapy 2nd suture power, if not respect this two factor the tendon will be break off. 3rd factor is the sliding resistance between The tendon and the pulley system it should be more than the sliding resistance (Kubota et al., 1996).
The aim of this study was to know the cyclic loading effect on the strength of flexor tendon repair using 6 strand Tang suture experimentally. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our study was well Prepared at Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine - Al Azhar University. The sheep are all healthy, and they had been killed for commercial purposes at a slaughterhouse. Flexor tendons are of the same diameter as that of flexor tendons in humans. All repairs performed by the same surgeon.The properties of porcine FDP-II tendons have been shown to be comparable with human flexor tendons. The tendons were tested for tensile strength in the Textile Metrology Lab., National Institute for Standards (TML-NIS) Cairo, Egypt. A total of 50 sheep forelimbs tendons of the same caliper were cut and sutured using Tang 6 strand repair technique using 4/0 polypropylenefor core suture + epitendinous continuous running sutures using 5/0 polypropylene. A looped locking line is first anchored on the dorsolateral aspect of the distal tendon stump. The lines are then inserted into the proximal tendon and passed longitudinally back towards the proximal tendon stump. A knot is tied over the tendon surface. Another two looped lines are inserted from The contralateral dorsolateral aspect the tendon and from the ventral aspect of the tendon.
Figure (1): A looped locking line is first anchored on the dorsolateral aspect of the distal tendon stump.
The suture configurations, locations of the longitudinal strands, and number of knots in the Tang method of tendon repair. In tendon cross-sections, three suture groups are placed at points of a triangle to avoid interference to the dorsal center of the tendon where the vascular networks converge. The dorsolateral sutures may act as tension bands to resist gapping of the tendon (Fig 2).
Figure (2): Tang 6 strand repair technique (Wang et al., 2003).
Tang 6 strand repair technique done by using simple sutures the same manner as looped sutures but different in strands arrangement inside cut sections (Figures 3,4,5).
Figure (3): Tang 6 strand repair technique done by using simple sutures.
Figure (4): Cut section of Tang 6 strand repair technique using looped sutures.
Figure (5): Cut section of Tang 6 strand repair technique using simple sutures. Tang 6 strand repair technique done by using simple not looped sutures (Figure 6).
Figure (6): Six strand tang repair
The tests were performed using a tensile strength measuring machine (Zwick / 2010). The measurements were displayed on a monitor screen, they are expressed in Newton. The length of the tendon segment between the two clamps of the testing machine was 55 mmand the loading speed was 0.2 Hz. The specimen then divided to two groups each one contain 25 tendons:
Group (A) Cyclic loading: A staircase protocol was employed. All tendons were initially loaded to a maximum load of 31.7 N for 500 cycles. Loading was subsequently increased by 5 N for an additional 500 cycles for surviving repairs. This procedure was repeated until failure occurred at a gap of more than 2 mm. Group (B) / Continuous loading :Twenty five samples were exposed to direct continuous loading until failure occurred .
RESULTS In cyclic loading the tendon repairs displayed a gradually increasing gap between the tendon ends. Maximum gap formation measured for The survival tendon repairs was 1.8mm (Failure occurred at a gap of more than 2 mm). The Tang technique demonstrated 80 % survival at 31.7 N testing, 72 % survival at 36.7 N testing and 44 % survival at 41.7 N testing without evidence of significant gap formation or rupture, Table (1). Table (1): The survivals % of stair case cyclic loading protocol sing Tang technique.
In continuous loading The mean breaking force of the six strand Tang repairs exposed to direct continuous loading until failure in tension using 4/0 polypropylene suture material was 55.95±2.19 N, Table (2). Table (2): Descriptive statistics for breaking force .
. DISCUSSION Many core suture techniques for flexor tendon repairs have been advocated, the most common of which is, the modified Kessler, the Bunnell, the Kessler the Savage, and the Pulvertaft (Hatanaka and Manske, 2000). Tang technique increase the strength of the repair due to more suture legs passing through the repair field in order to provide safe early active motion which prevent the post operative adhesion (the main cause of limited range of motion). However, with some disadvantages as technically demanding in clinical settings requiring multiple subsequent needle passes that increase tendon handling, longer time than other techniques. After tendon repairs in a secure way, the initial power of tendon must be 5 times much more than the power that it will compose in flexion against slight resistance (25N), because of the postoperative edema that will develop, the hardness of articulations and the sliding resistance which has developed in repair field (Linnanmaki et al., 2016). The strength of the repair was evaluated experimentally on animal tendons using a tensile strength measuring machine. Unlike other studies, the staircase technique employed assesses each repair for a range of load levels, thus minimizing concerns regarding selection of a suitable magnitude for a single applied load. Cyclic testing protocol was defined as a procedure that subjected a group of repaired flexor tendons to repetitive loading. Preload (5N) was the force before repetitive loading started. This was also the minimum force the repaired tendon was subjected to during cyclic loading. We believe that the most convincing reason for the use of pre-load is to simulate resting tension of the tendons after repair. This has been reported as 1 N for a healthy intact FDS tendon invivo (Matheson et al., 2005). Cyclic load (31.7/36.7/41.7N) was the maximum force that the repaired tendon is subjected to during cyclic loading. Normally, the Flexor tendons, apply a power of 2-4 N during passive flexion without applying resistance, a power of 10 N in flexion that is done against a slight degree resistance and a power of 17 N in flexion against middle degree resistance. During strong grasping this power increases up to70 N (Latendresse et al., 2005). Number of cycles (500/1000/1500cycle) was the number of repetitions during the protocol that the repaired tendon was dynamically loaded. Some studies chose the number of cycles based on previous findings that 90% of measured gap for core-only repairs was reached by 200 cycles, while 500 cycles were sufficient for composite repairs (Aoki et al., 1994, Piskin et al., 2007and Al-Qattan & Al-Turaiki, 2009). Frequency (0.2Hz) was the number of cycles over time. Frequency should be based on the rate of the performed exercises. Based on a rehabilitation protocol that conducts flexion and extensions of five to six times per minute, the frequency was set to a rate of 0.1 Hz (Sanders et al., 1997). Matheson use a similar protocol involving 10 flexion and extensions per minute yielding a frequency of 0.2 Hz (Al-Qattan and Al-Turaiki, 2009). Aoki et al.(1994) described the results of cyclic testing at 10 N of, Becker, and Savage techniques, the Kessler as well as a new technique incorporating a Dacron splint of varying sizes. Three of 7 Kessler-repair tendons and 1 of 6 Becker-repair tendons ruptured, in comparison with no ruptures for the other techniques. No Savage repair or splinted repair ruptured or gapped more than 2 mm after 40,000 cycles, suggesting these techniques are more resistant to cyclic loading (Aoki et al., 1994). Other study showed that the Silfverski- old-, Halsted-, and Tajima-repair tendons fail frequently in cyclic testing at loads representative of active digital motion. The Savage technique able to withstand loads of 35 N without gap formation or rupture. Cyclic loading testing is better than static linear testing in postoperative clinical loading of the tendon repair (Pruitt et al., 1994). Also, offers important advantages over static testing. Pruitt et al. have shown that cyclic testing demonstrates gap formation at lower loads than does static load-to-failure testing. Because it is more physiologic, cyclic testing may provide more relevant information regarding the failure characteristics of a tendon repair (Pruitt et al., 1994). The mean breaking force of the six strand Tang suture repair technique was 55.95±2.19N. Al-Qattan and Al-Turaiki in (2009) harvested fresh flexor profundus tendons from the hind feet of adult sheep and examined their tensile strength in three types of repair the modified Kessler technique (a two-strand repair), two ‘figure of eight’ sutures (a four-strand repair) and three ‘figure of eight’ sutures (a six-strand repair) using polypropylene suture material. The mean breaking forces for the double strand technique was 48.0 N, and for the six strand repair was 93.3 N. Piskin et al. (2007) compared different suture techniques in a biomechanical study of lamb's tendons using polyester suture material for the core suture and polypropylene suture material for the peripheral suture. The mean strengths of the tendons repaired with the modified Kessler technique for rupture was 37.0±4.0 N. The corresponding force was 51.3±6.1 N with the six-strand Savage technique. Mobilized tendons healed more quickly and stronger than immobilized tendons and that early active mobilization enhances tendon healing (Gelberman and Manske, 1985). Early motion in the postoperative period took place. The desire for maximal mobilization is obviously restricted by increased risk of rupture. This nessicates the presence of a strong repair that permits early motion (Pruitt et al., 1991). CONCLUSION The Tang suture method provides sufficient gap resistance and tensile strength able to withstand early active mobilization after primary flexor tendon repair. But the Tang method has some disadvantages because it takes longer time and long learning curve and difficult to use in small tendons.
REFERENCES Al-Qattan MM and Al-Turaiki TM (2009): Flexor Tendon Repair In Zone 2 Using A Six-Strand ‘Figure Of Eight’ Suture. The Journal of Hand Surgery European, 34(3) 322–328. Aoki M, Manske PR, Pruitt DL and Larson BJ. (1994): Tendon repair using flexor tendon splints: an experimental study. J Hand Surg. , 19A: 984-991. Barrie KA, Tomak SL, Cholewicki J, Merrell GA and Wolfe SW (2001):: Effect of suture locking and suture caliber on fatigue strength of flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg. , 26A:340–346. Gelberman RH and Manske PR. (1985): Factors influencing flexor tendon adhesions. Hand Clin. ; 1:35-42. Hatanaka H and Manske PR (2000): Effect of suture size on locking and grasping flexor tendon repair techniques. Clin Orthop. , 375:267–274. Kubota H, Aoki M, Pruitt DL and Manske PR (1996): Mechanical properties of various circumferential tendon suture techniques. J Hand Surg. , 21B:474–480. Latendresse K, Dona E, Scougall PJ, Schreuder FB, Puchert E and Walsh WR (2005): Cyclic testing of pullout sutures and micro-mitek suture anchors in flexor digitorum profundus tendon distal fixation. J. Hand. Surg. [Am.]. , 30 (3): 471–478. Linnanmaki L, Goransson H, Havulinna J, Sippola P, Karjalainen T and Leppanen OV (2016): Validity of parameters in static linear testing of flexor tendon repair. J. Biomech. , 49 (13): 2785–2790. Manske PR (2005): History of Flexor Tendon Repair. Hand Clin. , 21:123–127. Matheson G, Nicklin S, Gianoutsous MP and Walsh WR (2005): Comparison of zone II flexor tendon repairs using an in vitro linear cyclic testing protocol. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). , 20 (7): 718–722. McDowell CL, Marqueen TJ, Yager D, Owen JR and Wayne JS (2002): Characterization of the tensile properties and histologic/biochemical changes in normal chicken tendon at the site of suture insertion. J Hand Surg. , 27A:605–614 Piskin A, Yuceturk A, Tomak Y, Ozer M, Gulman B, Ataman A, Kangal M, Sahin Y, Desteli E and Alic T (2007): Tendon repair with the strengthened modified Kessler, modified Kessler, and Savage suture techniques: a biomechanical comparison. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. , 41(3):238-243. Pruitt DL, Manske PR and Fink B. (1994): Cyclic stress analysis of lfexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg. , 19A:701-707. Pruitt DL, Manske PR and Fink B (1991): Cyclic stress analysis of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. , 16(4):701-707. Sanders DW, Milne AD, Dobravec A, MacDermid J, Johnson JA and King GJ. (1997): Cyclic testing of flexor tendon repairs: an in vitro biomechanical study. The Journal of Hand Surgery. , 22(6):1004-10. Taras JS, Raphael JS, Marczyk SC and Bauerle WB (2001): Evaluation of suture caliber in flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg. , 26A:1100–1104. Wang B, Xie RG and Tang JB. (2003): Biomechanical analysis of a modification of Tang method of tendon repair. Journal of Hand Surg. , 28(4): 347-50. Xie RG and Tang JB (2005): Investigation of locking configurations for tendon repair. J Hand Surg. , 30A:461– 465. Xie Rg, Xue HG and Gu JH (2005): Effects of locking area on strength of 2- and 4-strand locking tendon repairs. J Hand Surg. , 30A:455–460.
دراسه تجریبیة لبیان مدی تأثیر التحمیل الدوری علی قوة إصلاح قطع الأوتار القابضة للید عبدالحکیم عبدالله مسعود - عمرو أحمد فؤاد - محمود سعد محمد قسم جراحة العظام - کلیة الطب - جامعة الأزهر خلفیة البحث: إن الحرکة النشطة المبکرة للأصابع المصابة بعد إجراء جراحة إصلاح الوتر تسرع الإلتام وتقلل الإلتصاقات ولکن ذلک مقید بزیادة إحتمالیة إعادة قطع الوتر الذى تم اصلاحه مما یستلزم عمل طریقة إصلاح قویة تسمح بهذه الحرکة النشطة المبکرة. الهدف من البحث: معرفة تأثیر التحمیل الدوری على قوة إصلاح وتر الإنقباض بإستخدام خیاطة تانج ذات الست خیوط بشکل تجریبی. مواد وطرق البحث: إحتوت هذه الدراسة التجریبیه على خمسین عینه من الأوتار تم تشریحها من أرجل الماعز تم قطعهم ثم اصلاحهم بطریقة تانج باستخدام خیط البولى برولین 4/0 و خیط 5/0 بولی برولین للغرزة الطرفیة. مقسمه إلی مجموعتین احتوت کل واحده على خمسه و عشرین عینة من الأوتار. وتمت اختبار المجموعتین باستخدام جهاز قیاس قوة الشدZwick / Z010)) المجموعة (أ) تم استخدام بروتوکول تحمیل دوری الدرج. تم تحمیل جمیع الأوتار مبدئیًا بحمولة أقصاها 31.7 نیوتن لمدة 500 دورة. تم زیادة التحمیل بعد ذلک بمقدار 5 نیوتن لمدة 500 دورة إضافیة للإصلاحات المتبقیة. تم تکرار هذا الإجراء حتى حدث الفشل (فشل أکثر من 2 مم). المجموعة (ب) و تم إختبارها بواسطه التحمیل المستمر نتائج البحث: المجموعة (أ) أظهرت تقنیة تانغ بقاء 80 ٪ من العینات فی اختبار 31.7 نیوتن و 72 ٪ فی اختبار 36.7 نیوتن و 44 ٪ فی اختبار 41.7نیوتن دون دلیل على وجود فجوة کبیرة أو تمزق. المجموعة (ب) کان متوسط قوة قطع الوتر 55.95 نیوتن طریقة تانج طریقة قویة وآمنة مما تسمح بحرکة نشطة ومبکرة مابعد الاصلاح مع مود حرکى افضل وقدر افضل على تنى الاصابع ضد مقاومة. الخلاصة: توفر طریقة خیاطة تانغ مقاومة کافیة للفجوة وقوة الشد قادرة على تحمل التعبئة النشطة المبکرة بعد إصلاح وتر العضلة المرنة. ولکن مع بعض العیوب المتعلقة باستهلاک الوقت أثناء الجراحة وصعوبة استخدامها فی طب الأطفال والأوتار الصغیرة.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
References | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
REFERENCES Al-Qattan MM and Al-Turaiki TM (2009): Flexor Tendon Repair In Zone 2 Using A Six-Strand ‘Figure Of Eight’ Suture. The Journal of Hand Surgery European, 34(3) 322–328.
Aoki M, Manske PR, Pruitt DL and Larson BJ. (1994): Tendon repair using flexor tendon splints: an experimental study. J Hand Surg. , 19A: 984-991.
Barrie KA, Tomak SL, Cholewicki J, Merrell GA and Wolfe SW (2001):: Effect of suture locking and suture caliber on fatigue strength of flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg. , 26A:340–346.
Gelberman RH and Manske PR. (1985): Factors influencing flexor tendon adhesions. Hand Clin. ; 1:35-42.
Hatanaka H and Manske PR (2000): Effect of suture size on locking and grasping flexor tendon repair techniques. Clin Orthop. , 375:267–274.
Kubota H, Aoki M, Pruitt DL and Manske PR (1996): Mechanical properties of various circumferential tendon suture techniques. J Hand Surg. , 21B:474–480.
Latendresse K, Dona E, Scougall PJ, Schreuder FB, Puchert E and Walsh WR (2005): Cyclic testing of pullout sutures and micro-mitek suture anchors in flexor digitorum profundus tendon distal fixation. J. Hand. Surg. [Am.]. , 30 (3): 471–478.
Linnanmaki L, Goransson H, Havulinna J, Sippola P, Karjalainen T and Leppanen OV (2016): Validity of parameters in static linear testing of flexor tendon repair. J. Biomech. , 49 (13): 2785–2790.
Manske PR (2005): History of Flexor Tendon Repair. Hand Clin. , 21:123–127.
Matheson G, Nicklin S, Gianoutsous MP and Walsh WR (2005): Comparison of zone II flexor tendon repairs using an in vitro linear cyclic testing protocol. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). , 20 (7): 718–722.
McDowell CL, Marqueen TJ, Yager D, Owen JR and Wayne JS (2002): Characterization of the tensile properties and histologic/biochemical changes in normal chicken tendon at the site of suture insertion. J Hand Surg. , 27A:605–614
Piskin A, Yuceturk A, Tomak Y, Ozer M, Gulman B, Ataman A, Kangal M, Sahin Y, Desteli E and Alic T (2007): Tendon repair with the strengthened modified Kessler, modified Kessler, and Savage suture techniques: a biomechanical comparison. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. , 41(3):238-243.
Pruitt DL, Manske PR and Fink B. (1994): Cyclic stress analysis of lfexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg. , 19A:701-707.
Pruitt DL, Manske PR and Fink B (1991): Cyclic stress analysis of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. , 16(4):701-707.
Sanders DW, Milne AD, Dobravec A, MacDermid J, Johnson JA and King GJ. (1997): Cyclic testing of flexor tendon repairs: an in vitro biomechanical study. The Journal of Hand Surgery. , 22(6):1004-10.
Taras JS, Raphael JS, Marczyk SC and Bauerle WB (2001): Evaluation of suture caliber in flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg. , 26A:1100–1104.
Wang B, Xie RG and Tang JB. (2003): Biomechanical analysis of a modification of Tang method of tendon repair. Journal of Hand Surg. , 28(4): 347-50.
Xie RG and Tang JB (2005): Investigation of locking configurations for tendon repair. J Hand Surg. , 30A:461– 465.
Xie Rg, Xue HG and Gu JH (2005): Effects of locking area on strength of 2- and 4-strand locking tendon repairs. J Hand Surg. , 30A:455–460.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistics Article View: 243 PDF Download: 264 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||