Pedicled Versus Microvascular Free Flaps Used for Reconstruction of Oral Cavity Defects Following Cancer Ablative Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study
Rayan, Y., Khairallah, S., Mousa, A., Alsharkawy, K., Kabbash, M. (2020). Pedicled Versus Microvascular Free Flaps Used for Reconstruction of Oral Cavity Defects Following Cancer Ablative Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study. EKB Journal Management System, 78(1), 101-109. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2020.68357
Yasser Mohammed Seddeik Abd El Raheim Rayan; Sherif Mohamed Khairallah; Ahmed K Mousa; Kamal abdel Aal Mohamed Hassanein Alsharkawy; Mansour M Kabbash. "Pedicled Versus Microvascular Free Flaps Used for Reconstruction of Oral Cavity Defects Following Cancer Ablative Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study". EKB Journal Management System, 78, 1, 2020, 101-109. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2020.68357
Rayan, Y., Khairallah, S., Mousa, A., Alsharkawy, K., Kabbash, M. (2020). 'Pedicled Versus Microvascular Free Flaps Used for Reconstruction of Oral Cavity Defects Following Cancer Ablative Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study', EKB Journal Management System, 78(1), pp. 101-109. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2020.68357
Rayan, Y., Khairallah, S., Mousa, A., Alsharkawy, K., Kabbash, M. Pedicled Versus Microvascular Free Flaps Used for Reconstruction of Oral Cavity Defects Following Cancer Ablative Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study. EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 78(1): 101-109. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2020.68357

Pedicled Versus Microvascular Free Flaps Used for Reconstruction of Oral Cavity Defects Following Cancer Ablative Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
Article 14, Volume 78, Issue 1, January 2020, Page 101-109  XML PDF (568.15 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2020.68357
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Yasser Mohammed Seddeik Abd El Raheim Rayan email 1; Sherif Mohamed Khairallah2; Ahmed K Mousa3; Kamal abdel Aal Mohamed Hassanein Alsharkawy4; Mansour M Kabbash5
1Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University
2Department of Oncosurgery, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University
3Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University.
4Department of Maxillofacial, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University
5Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University.
Abstract
Background: Oral cancer is currently a major global health issue. In developing countries, oral cavity cancer is estimated to be the third most common malignancy after cancer of the cervix and stomach. Surgical excision plays a major role in the treatment of oral cavity cancer patients. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare between pedicled and free flaps used for oral cavity reconstruction after ablation of squamous cell carcinoma. Patients and methods: This is a prospective comparative study that included 41 patients at National Cancer Institute (NCI) of Cairo University and Aswan University Hospital in the period from 2015 to 2018. Patients were selected from those who were attending the Outpatient Clinic of Head and Neck Surgery Unit at NCI, Cairo University and Aswan University Hospital. Results: Detection of short-term functional outcome regarding the swallowing, speech and oral competence, Contralateral Submental Island Flap (CSMIF) followed by Radial Forearm Free Flap (RFFF) showed better functional results than other flaps. The cosmetic outcome was better in 50% of CSMIF & RFFF cases. The Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap (TDAPF) cases showed a slightly higher care costs than other cases although in other specialized centers the care costs were found to be higher in RFFF cases than others. Conclusion: Oncologic outcomes were better with CSMIF and cosmetic outcomes were better in CSMIF and RFFF cases. Relatively, TDAP flap cases were higher than others in the overall care costs.
Keywords
Pedicled flaps; Free flaps; Oral cavity reconstruction; Squamous cell carcinoma
Statistics
Article View: 225
PDF Download: 425