Qualitative dispersion for the search engines and their awareness of and benefit from | ||||
| International Journal of Library and Information Sciences | ||||
| Article 4, Volume 3, Issue 4, October 2016, Page 138-165 PDF (823.17 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ijlis.2016.70298 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| Azza Farok El GoharY* | ||||
| قسم المکتبات جامعة بنى سويف | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| From the public perspective to organize the digital information environment, we find that the search engines are the biggest tools that regulate the online environment and allows sources to beneficiaries, The volume of information available on the Internet already amazing. Thus, learn how to use specialized search tools that are designed to help get information is the vehicle that enables us to effectively deal with this huge source of information, and the specifications that characterize one of the search tools is that distinguish them from others and determine their effectiveness and efficiency of use. With the development and services online environment tools have evolved, including the search engines and evolved types and multi-v characteristics and patterns of use, perhaps unconsciously on the part of the year the beneficiary; hence embodied study the problem of exposure to the search engines, in particular, represented by this problem in the following question: What kinds of search engines ? And classified depending on the mechanism by which it operates and the content provided by the researcher? Is there awareness by the researchers and science students in particular? To achieve this, the study used the methodology of descriptive analysis, as the use of device which the questionnaire that has been presented to 200 Single of the researchers working Beni Suef University community (faculty members and their assistants) questionnaire included a list of 40 the types of search engine name to find out the extent of awareness, knowledge and use of these engines, and the results yielded was limited to ten types of qualitative research engines, as has been proved that there are levels of quality loopback between the search of one type engines according to individual assessments and additional interactive services and potential feedback. The proportion of 74% of the study sample they do not use search engines other than General search engines, as opposed to 26% using other engines. Accordingly, the study recommended that he should be in Arabic and university libraries bother them especially by providing a number of all types of search engines within their websites. It also recommended the inclusion within the curriculum of all university programs interested in digital research tools and how to invest to drive awareness of learning and scientific research system | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| search engines | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 63 PDF Download: 221 |
||||
