Comparing PRF membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recession
A Abdel Reheem, A., M Khedr, M., M Madany, U. (2018). Comparing PRF membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recession. EKB Journal Management System, 21(4), 339-345. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2018.71595
Ahmed A Abdel Reheem; Mohammed M Khedr; Usama M Madany. "Comparing PRF membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recession". EKB Journal Management System, 21, 4, 2018, 339-345. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2018.71595
A Abdel Reheem, A., M Khedr, M., M Madany, U. (2018). 'Comparing PRF membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recession', EKB Journal Management System, 21(4), pp. 339-345. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2018.71595
A Abdel Reheem, A., M Khedr, M., M Madany, U. Comparing PRF membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recession. EKB Journal Management System, 2018; 21(4): 339-345. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2018.71595

Comparing PRF membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recession

Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science
Article 5, Volume 21, Issue 4, October 2018, Page 339-345  XML PDF (1.13 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2018.71595
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ahmed A Abdel Reheem* 1; Mohammed M Khedr* 2; Usama M Madany3
1Resident at MUST university
2Professor and Head of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Radiology Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys, Cairo), Al-Azhar University
3Professor of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Radiology Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys, Cairo), Al-Azhar University
Abstract
Background: The present study was conducted to compare the clinical outcome of using SCTG combined with coronally advanced flap against using PRF membrane combined with coronally advanced flap in treatment of gingival recession. Methods: fifteen patients with 20 recession defects were included in the study, Patients were divided according to treatment modalities into two groups. Group I: Patients were treated using SCTG combined with coronally advanced flap. Group II: Patients were treated using PRF membrane combined with coronally advanced flap. Measurements of gingival index (GI), Plaque index (PI), Recession height (RH), Probing depth (PD), Clinical attachment level (CAL) and width of keratinized gingiva (WKG) were recorded for both groups at baseline, 3 and 6 months post-operatively. Results: there was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding gingival index (GI), Plaque index (PI), Recession height (RH), Probing depth (PD), Clinical attachment level (CAL) and width of keratinized gingiva (WKG) after 3 and 6 months post-operatively. Conclusion: PRF membrane can be considered a safe and effective alternative treatment modality in treatment of gingival recession.
Statistics
Article View: 177
PDF Download: 450