Clinical Efficacy of Sonic Fill Composite versus Conventional Composites in Class II Cavities in Primary Molars
W, K., S, B., I, B. (2018). Clinical Efficacy of Sonic Fill Composite versus Conventional Composites in Class II Cavities in Primary Molars. EKB Journal Management System, 21(4), 375-381. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2018.71616
Kaddor W; Baiomy S; Barakat I. "Clinical Efficacy of Sonic Fill Composite versus Conventional Composites in Class II Cavities in Primary Molars". EKB Journal Management System, 21, 4, 2018, 375-381. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2018.71616
W, K., S, B., I, B. (2018). 'Clinical Efficacy of Sonic Fill Composite versus Conventional Composites in Class II Cavities in Primary Molars', EKB Journal Management System, 21(4), pp. 375-381. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2018.71616
W, K., S, B., I, B. Clinical Efficacy of Sonic Fill Composite versus Conventional Composites in Class II Cavities in Primary Molars. EKB Journal Management System, 2018; 21(4): 375-381. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2018.71616

Clinical Efficacy of Sonic Fill Composite versus Conventional Composites in Class II Cavities in Primary Molars

Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science
Article 9, Volume 21, Issue 4, October 2018, Page 375-381  XML PDF (845.94 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2018.71616
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Kaddor W* 1; Baiomy S* 2; Barakat I3
1BDS, Pedodontics and Oral Health Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo. Al-Azhar University
2Professor, Pedodontics and Oral Health Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo. Al-Azhar University
3Lecturer, Pedodontics and Oral Health Department. Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo. Al-Azhar University
Abstract
Conventional caries lesions management is usually based on operative procedures to re-establish the surface integrity and enable efficient dental plaque removal. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of sonic fill composite versus conventional composites in restoration class II cavities in primary molars. Twenty four patients having primary teeth indicated for restoration. Group I: Control group (12 patients) those were received conventional composite restorations for class II cavity. Group II: (12 patients) were received composite restoration (sonic fill) for class II cavity. The patients were evaluated according to FDI clinical criteria. The result revealed that the current study show better surface gloss and lower marginal staining found in sonic fill composite than conventional composite with subsequent advent of bulk fill composites, would seem to be a significant turning point in posterior direct restorative dentistry.
Statistics
Article View: 127
PDF Download: 211