Stem cells in orthodontics : A Review | ||||
Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science | ||||
Article 4, Volume 21, Issue 5, December 2018, Page 433-441 PDF (254.8 K) | ||||
Document Type: Review Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2018.71682 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Yasser Mohammad El-Sayed Hassouna* 1; Ashraf Atia Ali El-Bedwehi* 2; Aldany Atwa Mohamed* 3; Wael Abo-Elkhair Mostafa* 4; Mohamed Abdel-Akher Mohamad Omar5 | ||||
1Orthodontist Maadi Military Hospital Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
2Professor of Orthodontics Vice president for girls branch Al-Azhar University Egypt. | ||||
3Professor of Orthodontics, Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
4Professor of Microbiology and Immunology, Military Medical Academy Egypt. | ||||
5Professor of oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dean of Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys),Al-Azhar University, Cairo Egypt. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Objective: To evaluate the stability of Immediate placed dental maxillary implant in fresh extracted socket versus delayed placed implant in healed site. Methods: This study consisted of 10 patients having twenty implant divided into two groups. (Ten each) First group, immediate implant placed in fresh extracted socket. Second group, delayed implant at the healed bone site. Both groups were placed at the anterior region of maxilla. Implant stability quotient (ISq) was measured by Osstell mentor device and was recorded at the time of implant placement (T1) and 20 weeks after placement, at the time of implant loading (T2). All implants were not functionally loaded during the follow up period. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) were taken to detect the alveolar bone height, width and bone density Results: No implant failures were reported in the 6-month follow up period. The study showed that no differences in the stability at the time of loading (T2) between immediate placed implant in fresh extracted socket and delayed placed implant in healed sites compared with (T1) during the time of installation. Conclusion: Immediate implant is better than delayed placed implant in indicated cases due to it is advantages. | ||||
Statistics Article View: 262 PDF Download: 1,053 |
||||